This study investigated the impact of GenAI on students’ English oral proficiency, foreign language speaking anxiety (FLSA), and linguistic risk-taking (LRT). Seventy-one Chinese university students learning English as a foreign language (EFL) participated in an 8-week programme for oral practice supported by GenAI. The students were divided into two groups: the high proficiency group (HG, n = 37) and the low proficiency group (LG, n = 34). Besides an assessment of English-speaking ability, they also completed surveys measuring their perceptions of their oral proficiency, anxiety and risk-taking before and after the programme. Results showed both groups experienced improvements in their English oral proficiency and LRT, accompanied by a noteworthy reduction in FLSA. The HG learners exhibited substantial enhancement in vocabulary among all speaking skills, whereas the LG learners experienced a notable progress in fluency. These findings provide insights into the effectiveness of GenAI in enhancing students’ English-speaking learning outcomes and emotional dynamics.
BashoriMVan HoutRStrikH, et al. (2021) Effects of ASR-based websites on EFL learners’ vocabulary, speaking anxiety, and language enjoyment. System99: 102496.
2.
Bin-HadyWRAAl-KadiAHazaeaA, et al. (2023) Exploring the dimensions of ChatGPT in English language learning: a global perspective. Library Hi Tech. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-05-2023-0200
3.
BraunVClarkeV (2012) Thematic analysis. In: CooperHCamicPMLongDL, et al. (eds) APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol. 2. Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
4.
BrownSL (2005) Relationships between risk-taking behaviour and subsequent risk perceptions. British Journal of Psychology96(2): 155–164.
5.
ChenS (2006) A study of communication strategies in interlanguage production by Chinese EFL learners. Language Learning40(2): 155–187.
6.
ConiamD (2014) The linguistic accuracy of chatbots: usability from an ESL perspective. Text and Talk34(5): 545–567.
7.
DalalahDDalalahOM (2023) The false positives and false negatives of generative AI detection tools in education and academic research: the case of ChatGPT. The International Journal of Management Education21(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100822
8.
Dal PianMCDal PianLFDal PianM (2024) Learning through conversation in the era of generative artificial intelligence. In: EDULEARN24 Proceedings. IATED, pp. 6684–6693. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2024.1586
9.
DehbozorgiE (2012) Effects of attitude towards language learning and risk-taking on EFL student's proficiency. International Journal of English Linguistics2(2): 41–48.
10.
DizonG (2017) Using intelligent personal assistants for second language learning: a case study of Alexa. Tesol Journal8(4): 811–830.
11.
DörnyeiZ (1998) Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching31(3): 117–135.
12.
DuJDanielBK (2024) Transforming language education: a systematic review of AI-powered chatbots for English as a foreign language speaking practice. Computers and Education. Artificial Intelligence6: 100230.
13.
DwivediYKKshetriNHughesL, et al. (2023) So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management71(2): 155–187.
14.
EbadiSAzizimajdH (2024) Exploring the impact of role-playing in clubhouse on the oral fluency and willingness to communicate of EFL learners. Education and Information Technologies29(7): 7927–7968.
15.
El ShazlyR (2021) Effects of artificial intelligence on English speaking anxiety and speaking performance: a case study. Expert Systems38(3): e12667.
16.
FathiJRahimiMDerakhshanA (2024) Improving EFL learners’ speaking skills and willingness to communicate via artificial intelligence-mediated interactions. System121: 103254.
17.
Fernández-GarcíaAFonseca-MoraMC (2022) EFL Learners’ speaking proficiency and its connection to emotional understanding, willingness to communicate and musical experience. Language Teaching Research26(1): 124–140.
18.
HanZ (2024) Chatgpt in and for second language acquisition: a call for systematic research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition46(2): 301–306.
19.
HorwitEKHorwitzMBCopeJ (1986) Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal70(2): 125–132.
20.
HuangFZouB (2024) English Speaking with artificial intelligence (AI): the roles of enjoyment, willingness to communicate with AI, and innovativeness. Computers in Human Behavior159: 108355.
21.
HuangWHewKFFryerLK (2021) Chatbots for language learning-are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning38(1): 237–257.
22.
JiHHanIKoY (2023) A systematic review of conversational AI in language education: focusing on the collaboration with human teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education55(1): 48–63.
23.
KimASuY (2024) How implementing an AI chatbot impacts Korean as a foreign language learners’ willingness to communicate in Korean. System122: 103256.
24.
KohnKHoffstaedterP (2017) Learner agency and non-native speaker identity in pedagogical lingua franca conversations: insights from intercultural telecollaboration in foreign language education. Computer Assisted Language Learning30(5): 351–367.
25.
LeeJSHsiehJC (2019) Affective variables and willingness to communicate of EFL learners in in-class, out-of-class, and digital contexts. System82: 63–73.
26.
LinYLinY (2020) The enlightenment of affective filter hypothesis and risk-taking on English learning. Studies in Literature and Language20(2): 51–57.
27.
LuriaE (2024) Exploring the use of Alexa as a motivational tool in English language learning among EFL students in Israel. In: PapadakisS (eds) Iot, AI, and ICT for Educational Applications: Technologies to Enable Education for All. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50139-5_4
28.
MacIntyrePD (2017) An overview of language anxiety research and trends in its development. New Insights into Language Anxiety: Theory, Research and Educational Implications. 11–30. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783097722-003
29.
MohamedAM (2024) Exploring the potential of an AI-based Chatbot (ChatGPT) in enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teaching: perceptions of EFL Faculty Members. Education and Information Technologies29(3): 3195–3217.
30.
PengJE (2019) The roles of multimodal pedagogic effects and classroom environment in willingness to communicate in English. System82: 161–173.
31.
PyunDOKimJSChoHY, et al. (2014) Impact of affective variables on Korean as a foreign language learners’ oral achievement. System47: 53–63.
32.
RichardsJC (2015) The changing face of language learning: learning beyond the classroom. Relc Journal46(1): 5–22.
33.
SadoughiMHejaziSY (2024) Growth language mindset and willingness to communicate: contributions of linguistic risk taking and learning experience. Acta Psychologica248: 104367.
34.
SlavkovN (2023) Linguistic risk-taking: a new pedagogical approach and a research program. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics26(2): 32–59.
35.
SuzukiYHanzawaK (2022) Massed task repetition is a double-edged sword for fluency development: an EFL classroom study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition44(2): 536–561.
36.
TaiTYChenHHJ (2023) The impact of google assistant on adolescent EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Interactive Learning Environments31(3): 1485–1502.
37.
TaiTYChenHHJ (2024) Improving elementary EFL speaking skills with generative AI chatbots: exploring individual and paired interactions. Computers and Education220: 105112.
38.
TengYWangX (2024) Full caption, English proficiency and their relationships with behavioral, cognitive and emotional student engagement in Chinese EFL college content-based instruction video learning. Education and Information Technologies29(1): 861–880.
39.
TurnerMLinAM (2024) Translanguaging: process and power in education. Linguistics and Education83: 101340.
YildizM (2023) Exploring the potential of chatbots and ChatGPT in enhancing vocabulary knowledge. In: KartalG (eds) Transforming the Language Teaching Experience in the Age of AI. IGI Global, pp. 160–188.
42.
YinQSatarM (2020) English as a foreign language learner interactions with chatbots: negotiation for meaning. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching7(2): 390–410. http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/707
43.
ZhangCMengYMaX (2024) Artificial intelligence in EFL speaking: Impact on enjoyment, anxiety, and willingness to communicate. System121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system 2024.103259
44.
ZhouJKePQiuX, et al. (2023) ChatGPT: potential, prospects, and limitations. Frontiers of Information Technology and Electronic Engineering1–6. https://doi.org/10.1631/FITEE.2300089
45.
ZouBGuanXShaoY, et al. (2023) Supporting speaking practice by social network-based interaction in artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted language learning. Sustainability15(4): 2872.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
