A Move-marker List: A Study of Rhetorical Move-lexis Linguistic Realizations of Research Article Abstracts in Social and Behavioural Sciences

Abstract

While a wealth of research is available on the frequent multi-word units in academic genres, studies that exclusively link lexical sequences to the rhetorical moves in research articles (RAs) are fairly limited. This study involved compiling a corpus of 8,500 RA abstracts sampled from five disciplines of economics, law, political sciences, psychology, and sociology in social and behavioural sciences. Three to nine-word ngrams were generated using AntConc 3.4.4, which is a freeware corpus analysis toolkit. All the ngrams were studied in their contexts through concordance analysis and classified based on the rhetorical moves in which they occurred using the move structure taxonomy suggested by Hatzitheodorou (2014). Eventually, ngrams were processed at multiple levels and synthesized into 84 move-marker structures. This study offers insights into the linguistic realizations of moves in RA abstracts and introduces the concept of move-marker structures. In so doing, the potentials of positionally variable move-marker structures in improving English for Academic Purposes (EAP)/English for Specific Purposes (ESP) learners’ phraseological competence are suggested.

Keywords

Lexical sequences rhetorical moves academic writing move-markers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agathopoulou

(2009) Characteristics of high-rated and low-rated conference abstracts: a genre-based analysis. In: K Katsaboxaki-Hodgets (ed) Proceedings of the International Conference Options and Practices of LSP. University of Crete. Crete: Crete University Press, 150–70.

Aitchison

Lee

(2006) Research writing: problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education 11(3): 265–78.

Biber

Connor

Upton

(2007) Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure (Vol. 28). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamin’s Publishing Co.

Cavalieri

(2014) Variation across disciplines: the case of applied linguistics and medicine. In: Bondi

Lorés-Sanz

(eds) Abstracts in Academic Discourse: Variation and Change. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang, International Academic Publishers, 161–74.

Chang

Schleppegrell

(2011) Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10(3): 140–51.

Chen

Baker

(2010) Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology 14(2): 30–49.

Cortes

(2013) The purpose of this study is to: connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(1): 33–43.

Cunningham

(2017) A phraseological exploration of recent mathematics research articles through key phrase frames. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 25(A1-A2): 71–83.

Cutting

(2012) Vague language in conference abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11(4): 283–93.

10.

Dos Santos

(1996) The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 16(4): 481–500.

11.

Durrant

(2009) Investigating the viability of a collocation list for students of English for academic purposes. English for Specific Purposes 28(3): 157–69.

12.

Ebrahimi

Chan

(2015) Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and economics: functional analysis of the grammatical subject. Australian Journal of Linguistics 35(4): 381–97.

13.

Gea-Valor

Rey-Rocha

Moreno

(2014) Publishing research in the international context: an analysis of Spanish scholars’ academic writing needs in the social sciences. English for Specific Purposes 36: 47–59.

14.

Friginal

Mustafa

(2017) A comparison of US-based and Iraqi English research article abstracts using corpora. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 25: 45–57.

15.

Gillaerts

(2014) Shifting metadiscourse: looking for diachrony in the abstract genre. In: Bondi

Lorés Sanz

(eds) Abstracts in Academic Discourse: Variation and Change. Berlin: Peter Lang, 271–86.

16.

Gillaerts

Van de Velde

(2010) Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(2): 128–39.

17.

Hatzitheodorou

(2012) A genre-oriented analysis of research article abstracts in law and business journals. Abstracts in Academic Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang, 175–98.

18.

Hyland

(2000) Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing: Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

19.

Hyland

(2004) Disciplinary Discourses, Michigan Classics Ed: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Michigan publishing.

20.

Hyland

(2006) Disciplinary differences: language variation in academic discourses. In: Hyland

Bondi

(eds) Academic Discourse across Disciplines. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 17–45.

21.

Hyland

(2016) Academic Publishing: Issues and Challenges in the Construction of Knowledge-Oxford Applied Linguistics. England: Oxford University Press.

22.

Jiang

Hyland

(2017) Metadiscursive nouns: interaction and cohesion in abstract moves. English for Specific Purposes 46: 1–14.

23.

Kanoksilapatham

(2003) A Corpus-based investigation of scientific research articles: linking move analysis with multidimensional analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.

24.

Liddy

(1991) The discourse-level structure of empirical abstracts: an exploratory study. Information Processing & Management 27(1): 55–81.

25.

Martın

(2003) A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes 22(1): 25–43.

26.

Omidian

Shahriari

Siyanova-Chanturia

(2018) A cross-disciplinary investigation of multi-word expressions in the moves of research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36: 1–14.

27.

Pho

(2008) Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: a study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies 10(2): 231–50.

28.

Salager-Meyer

(1990) Discoursal flaws in medical English abstracts: a genre analysis per research-and text-type. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 10(4): 365–84.

29.

Samraj

(2005) An exploration of a genre set: research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 24(2): 141–56.

30.

Samraj

(2014) Disciplinary variation in abstracts: the case of wildlife behavior and conservation biology. In: Academic Discourse. London: Routledge, 50–66.

31.

Sanz

(2006) ‘I will argue that’: first person pronouns as metadiscoursal devices in research article abstracts in English and Spanish. ESP across Cultures 3: 23–40.

32.

Swales

(1981) Aspects of Article Introductions (No.1). Birmingham: The University of Aston, Language Studies Unit.

33.

Swales

(1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

34.

Swales

(2004) Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

35.

Swales

Feak

(2010) From text to task: putting research on abstracts to work. Utrecht Studies in Language and Communication 22: 167–80.

36.

Tankó

(2017) Literary research article abstracts: an analysis of rhetorical moves and their linguistic realizations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 27: 42–55.

37.

Tseng

(2011) Analyses of move structure and verb tense of research article abstracts in applied linguistics. International Journal of English Linguistics 1(2): 27–39.

38.

Van Bonn

Swales

(2007) English and French journal abstracts in the language sciences: three exploratory studies. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(2): 93–108.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB