The relationship between language learners’ L1 and L2 writing productions has attracted the attention of researchers since Kaplan (1966). Along this research line, the present study aimed to explore the reverse transfer of rhetorical patterns from English (L2) to Persian (L1) in the argumentative essays of EFL students in Iran. Sixty MA university students (30 English-majors and 30 non-English-majors) participated in the study. Adopting the scheme developed by Kubota (1998a, 1998b), the study focused on the organization of the essays. The main findings of the study are (a) the non-significant difference between L1 and L2 essays of the same student in both English and non-English majors (b) the positive and significant correlation between the qualities of L1 and L2 essays in both English and non-English majors, (c) and the probable transfer of English-specific organization patterns from L2 to L1 especially among English majors.
AnsaryHBabaiiE (2009) A cross-cultural analysis of English newspaper editorials. RELC Journal40(2) 211–49.
2.
ConnorU (1996) Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-cultural Aspects of Second-language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
ConnorU (1999) Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-cultural Aspects of Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
ConnorU (2002) New directions in contrastive rhetoric. TESOL Quarterly36(4): 493–510.
5.
ConnorU (2004) Intercultural rhetorical research: beyond texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes3(4): 291–304.
6.
ConnorUNagelhoutERozyckiW (eds) (2008) Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to Intercultural Rhetoric. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
7.
CookV (2003) Introduction: the changing L1 in the L2 user’s mind. In CookV (ed.) Effects of the Second Language on the First. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1–6. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511806766.003
8.
CummingA (1998) Theoretical perspectives on writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics18(1): 61–78.
9.
HashemianM (2011) The effects of L2 writing ability on L1 writing ability. Journal of Language Teaching and Research2(6): 1306–11.
10.
HiroseK (2003) Comparing L1 and L2 organizational patterns in the argumentative writing of Japanese EFL students. Journal of Second Language Writing12(2): 181–209.
11.
HiroseKSasakiM (1994) Explanatory variables for Japanese students’ expository writing in English: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing3(3): 203–229.
12.
KaplanRB (1966) Cultural thought patterns in inter-cultural education. In: SilvaTMatsudaPK (eds) Landmark Essays on ESL Writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 11–25.
13.
KecskesIPappT (2000) Foreign Language and Mother Tongue. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
14.
KecskesIPappT (2003) How to demonstrate the conceptual effect of L2 on L1? Methods and techniques. In CookVJ (ed.) Effects of the Second Language on the First. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 247–65.
15.
KobayashiHRinnetC (2005) Transferability of argumentative writing competence from L2 to L1: effects of overseas experience. In: ConrickMHowardM (eds) From Applied Linguistics to Linguistics Applied: Issues, Practices, Trends. British Studies in Applied Linguistics 22.
16.
KobayashHRinnertC (2008) Task response and text construction across L1 and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing17(1): 7–29.
17.
KobayashiHRinnertC (2010) Understanding L2 writing development from the perspective of multicompetent literacy development. In: Manchon(Chair), Focusing on L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives. Invited colloquia at Association of American Applied Linguistics (AAAL) 2010 Conference, Atlanta, GA.
18.
KubotaR (1992) Contrastive rhetoric of Japanese and English:A critical approach. A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of PhD in the University of Toronto.
19.
KubotaR (1998a) An investigation of Japanese and English L1 essay organization: differences and similarities. The Canadian Modern Language Review54(4). DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.54.4.475
20.
KubotaR (1998b) An investigation of L1–L2transfer in writing among Japanese university students: implications for contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Second Language Writing7(1): 69–100.
21.
KubotaRLehnerA (2004) Toward critical contrastive rhetoric [Electronic version]. Journal of Second Language Writing13(1): 7–27. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.003
22.
LekiI (1991) Twenty-five years of contrastive rhetoric: Text analysis and writing pedagogies. TESOL Quarterly25(1): 123–143. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3587031
23.
LekiI (1995) Coping strategies of ESL students in writing across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly29(2): 235–60.
MeyerBJF (1975) Identification of the structure of prose and its implications for the study of reading and memory. Journal of Reading Behavior2(1): 7–47. DOI:10.1.1.948.5141&rep=rep1
26.
MohanBALoWA (1985) Academic writing and Chinese students: transfer and developmental factors. TESOL Quarterly19(3): 515–34.
27.
PavlenkoA (2000) L2 influence on L1 in late bilingualism. Issues in Applied Linguistics11(2): 175–205.
28.
RashidiNDastkhezrZA (2009) A comparison of English and Persian organizational patterns in the argumentative writing of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language International English2(1): 131–52.
29.
RiaziAAssarF (2000) A text analysis of Persian newspaper editorials at macro and micro levels. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities15(1): 30–31.
30.
SasakiMHiroseK (1996) Explanatory variables for EFL students’ expository writing. A Journal of Research in Language Studies64(1): 137–168.
31.
SuI (2001) Transfer of sentence processing strategies: A comparison of L2 learners of Chinese and English. Applied Psycholinguistics22(1): 83–112.
32.
UysalH H (2008) Tracing the culture behind writing: rhetorical patterns and bidirectional transfer in L1 and L2essays of Turkish writers in relation to educational background. Journal of Second Language Writing17(3): 183–207.
33.
WeinreichU (1953) Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York.
34.
YoonC (2010) Bi-directional rhetorical transfer in the writing of Korean learners of English: a case study of three groups. Second Language Studies28(2): 49–95.
