This article describes the gathered experience in using corpora in an IELTS preparation course. The practice demonstrates an attempt to reduce negative washback effects occurring when preparation courses just concentrate on the test format neglecting the importance of development of learners’ language skills and general study skills. Some corpus-based activities, which were used in a group of Russian university students for teaching vocabulary and writing, are provided. The author’s experience in using corpora proves such positive effects of corpus teaching as an increase in the learners’ understanding of usage patterns, drop in the number of collocation errors they make, enhancement of the students’ autonomy and self-correction skills.
ConradS (2000) Will corpus linguistic revolutionize grammar teaching in the 21st century?TESOL Quarterly: TESOL in the 21st Century34(3): 548–60.
7.
Frankerberg-GarciaA (2014) The use of corpus examples for language comprehension and production. ReCALL26(2): 128–46.
8.
GabrielatosC (2005) Corpora and language teaching: just a fling or wedding bells?Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language8(4). Available at: http://www.tesl-ej.org/ej32/a1.html
9.
GavioliL (1997) Exploring texts through the concordancer: guiding the learner. In WichmannAFligelstoneSMcEneryTKnowlesG (eds) Teaching and Language Corpora. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, 83–99.
10.
GriesST (2008) Corpus-based methods in analysis of second-language acquisition data. In: RobinsonPEllisN (eds) Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge, 406–31.
11.
HughesA (1993) Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
JohnsT (1991) Should you be persuaded: two examples of data driven learning. In: JohnsTKingP (eds) Classroom Concordancing. ELR Journal4:1–16.
13.
JohnsT (1994) From printout to handout: grammar and vocabulary teaching in the context of data-driven learning. In: Johns T, Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar. New York: Cambridge University Press, 293–313.
14.
JohnsT (1997) Contexts: the background, development and trialling of a concordance-based CALL program. In: WichmannAFligelstoneSMcEneryTKnowlesG (eds) Teaching and Language Corpora. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, 100–15.
15.
LightbownP (1985) Can language acquisition be altered by instruction? In HyltenstamKPienemannM (eds) Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 101–12.
16.
LiuDJiangP (2009) Using a corpus-based lexicogrammatical approach to grammar instruction in EFL and ESL. The Modern Language Journal93(1): 61–78.
17.
LüdelingAKytöM (2008) Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
18.
McCarthyM (1990) Vocabulary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
McEneryTWilsonA (2001) Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
20.
QianD (2007) Assessing university students: searching for an English language exit test. RELC Journal38(1): 18–37.
21.
RutherfordWE (1987) Second Language Grammar: Learning and Teaching. New York: Longman.
22.
SchmidtRW (1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics11(2): 129–58.
23.
Sharwood SmithM (1981) Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics2(2): 159–69.
24.
SinclairJ (1986) Basic computer processing of long texts. In: LeechGCandlinCN (eds) Computers in English Language Teaching and Research. New York: Longman Group Limited, 185–203.
25.
ThomasJ (2015) Stealing a march on collocation. In: Leńko-SzymańskaABoultonA (eds) Multiple Affordances of Language Corpora for Data-driven Learning. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co., 85–108.
26.
TomlinsonB (2005) Testing to learn: a personal view of language testing. ELT Journal59(1): 39–46.
27.
ZhengdongG (2009) IELTS preparation course and students IELTS performance: a case study in Hong Kong. RELC Journal40(1): 23–41.
