Relationships between Chinese College Test Takers’ Strategy Use and EFL Reading Test Performance: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach

Abstract

This article investigates the relationships between test takers’ strategy use and test performance on an EFL reading test. For this study 209 Chinese college students were invited to participate in a reading comprehension test and answer a 30-item strategy use questionnaire. Results showed that two factors underlay test takers’ reading test performance: lexico-grammatical reading ability (LEX-GR) and text comprehension reading ability (TxtCOM). In addition, metacognitive strategy use had a significant and direct effect on cognitive strategy use, implying that the former performed an executive function over the latter. Monitoring strategies were found to have a significant effect on LEX-GR and evaluating strategies significantly affected TxtCOM, suggesting that metacognitive strategy use played an important role on the reading test. Pedagogical implications are also discussed.

Keywords

Metacognitive strategy use cognitive strategy use EFL reading test performance Chinese college students structural equation modeling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afflerbach

Pearson

Paris

(2008) Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. Reading Teacher 61: 364-73.

Alderson

(1979) The cloze procedure and proficiency in English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly 13: 219-27.

Anderson

(1989) Reading comprehension tests versus academic reading: what are second language readers doing? Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.

Anderson

(1991) Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. Modern Language Journal 75: 460-72.

Arbuckle

(2011) IBM SPSS Amos 20.0 [Computer Program]. New York: IBM.

Bachman

(2004) Statistical Analyses for Language Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bachman

Palmer

(1996) Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bachman

Palmer

(2010) Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baker

Brown

(1984) Metacognitive skills and reading. In: Pearson

Barr

Kamil

Mosenthal

(eds) Handbook of Research in Reading, 353-94. White Plains, NY: Longman.

10.

Bandalos

Finney

(2001) Item Parceling Issues in Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

11.

Block

(1986) The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly 20: 463-93.

12.

Block

(1992) See how they read: comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly 26: 319-43.

13.

Brown

(1978) Knowing when, where, and how to remember: a problem of metacognition. In: Glaser

(ed.) Advances in Instructional Psychology, Vol.1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 77-165.

14.

Brown

(1980) Metacognitive development and reading. In: Spiro

Bruce

Brewer

(eds) Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension: Perspectives from Psychology, Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence and Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 453-82.

15.

Brown

Bransford

Ferrara

and Campione

(1983) Learning, remembering and understanding. In: Flavell

Markman

(eds) Handbook of Child Psychology Vol. 3, Cognitive Development (4th ed)). New York: Wiley, 515-29.

16.

Browne

Cudeck

(1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen

Long

(eds) Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 136-62.

17.

Byrne

(2001) Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

18.

Carrell

(1989) Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. Modern Language Journal 73: 121-31.

19.

Celce-Murcia

Larsen-Freeman

(1999) The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.

20.

Cohen

(1984) On taking language tests: what the students report. Language Testing 1: 70-81.

21.

Cohen

(1998) Strategies and processes in test taking and SLA. In Bachman

Cohen

(eds) Interface between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 90-111.

22.

Cohen

Macaro

(eds) (2007) Language Learner Strategies: Thirty Years of Research and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

23.

Ellis

(2008) The Study of Second Language Acquisition (2nd ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

24.

Færch

Kasper

(1983) Strategies in Interlanguage Communication. London: Longman.

25.

Fan

Thompson

Wang

(1999) Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation. Structural Equation Modeling 6: 56-83.

26.

Flavell

(1978) Metacognitive development. In: Scadura

Brainerd

(eds) Structural Process Theories of Complex Human Behavior. Alphen a. d. Rijn, The Netherlands: Sijthoff and Noordhoff.

27.

Flavell

(1979) Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 34: 906-11.

28.

Flavell

Miller

(2002) Cognitive Development (4th ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

29.

Gagnè

Yekovich

and Yekovich

(1993) The Cognitive Psychology of School Learning. New York: Harper Collins.

30.

Gan

Humphreys

and Hamp-Lyons

(2004) Understanding successful and unsuccessful EFL students in Chinese universities. Modern Language Journal 88: 229-44.

31.

Gough

Tunmer

(1986) Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education 7: 6-10.

32.

Grabe

(2009) Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

33.

Hatch

Lazaraton

(1991) The Research Manual: Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.

34.

Hinofotis

(1980) Cloze as an alternative method of ESL placement and proficiency testing. In: Oller

Perkins

(eds) Research in Language Testing. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 121-28.

35.

Hsiao

Oxford

(2002) Comparing theories of language learning strategies: a confirmatory factor analysis. Modern Language Journal 86: 368-83.

36.

Bentler

(1999) Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternative. Structural Equation Modeling 6: 1-55.

37.

Huang

X-H

Van Naerssen

(1985) Learning strategies for oral communication. Applied Linguistics 6: 287-307.

38.

IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 20.0) [Computer Program]. New York: IBM.

39.

In’nami

Koizumi

(2011) Structural equation modeling in language testing and learning research: a review. Language Assessment Quarterly 8: 250-76.

40.

Jacobs

Paris

(1987) Children’s metacognition about reading: issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist 22: 255-78.

41.

Jin

(2008) Powerful tests, powerfulness test designers? Changes facing the College English Test. CELEA Journal 31: 3-11.

42.

Kern

(1989) Second language reading strategy instruction: its effects on comprehension and word inference ability. Modern Language Journal 73: 135-46.

43.

Kintsch

(1998) Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

44.

Kline

(2010) Principles and Practices of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

45.

Kunnan

(1995) Test Taker Characteristics and Test Performance: A Structural Modeling Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

46.

Kunnan

(1998) An introduction to structural equation modelling for language assessment research. Language Testing 15: 295-332.

47.

Little

Cunningham

Shahar

Widaman

(2002) To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling 9: 151-73.

48.

LaBerge

Samuel

(1974) Toward a theory of automatic information processing. Cognitive Psychology 6: 293-323.

49.

Macaro

Erler

(2008) Raising the achievement of young-beginner readers of French through strategy instruction. Applied Linguistics 29: 90-119.

50.

Markham

(1985) The rational deletion cloze and global comprehension in German. Language Testing, 35: 423-30.

51.

Mokhatari

Sheorey

(2002) Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Development Education 25: 2-10.

52.

National College English Testing Committee (2006) CET-4 Test Syllabus and Sample Test Paper (2006 Revised Version). Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

53.

O’Malley

Chamot

(1990) Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

54.

Oller

(1979) Language Tests at School: A Pragmatic Approach. London: Longman.

55.

Oxford

(1990) Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.

56.

Oxford

(2011) Teaching and Research Language Learning Strategies. New York: Longman.

57.

Paris

(2002) When is metacognition helpful, debilitating, or benign? In: Chambres

Izaute

Marescaux

(eds) Metacognition: Process, Function, and Use. Norwell, MA: Kluwer, 105-20.

58.

Paris

Hamilton

(2009) The development of children’s reading comprehension. In: Israel

Duffy

(eds) Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension. New York: Routledge, 32-53.

59.

Paris

Lipson

and Wixson

(1983) Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology 8: 293–316.

60.

Pearson

(2009) The roots of reading comprehension instruction. In: Israel

Duffy

(eds), Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension. New York: Routledge, 3-31.

61.

Phakiti

(2003) A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing 20: 26-56.

62.

Phakiti

(2008) Construct validation of Bachman and Palmer’s (1996) strategic competence model over time in EFL reading tests. Language Testing 25: 237-72.

63.

Politzer

McGoarty

(1985) An exploratory study of learning behaviors and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly 19: 103-24.

64.

Purpura

(1997) An analysis of the relationships between test takers’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language test performance. Language Learning 47: 289-94.

65.

Purpura

(1999) Learner Strategy Use and Performance on Language Tests: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

66.

Purpura

(2004) Assessing Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

67.

Rubin

(1981) The study of cognitive processes in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 2: 117-31.

68.

Saito

(2003) Investigating the construct validity of the cloze section in the Examination for the Certificate of Proficiency in English. Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment 1: 39-82.

69.

Shanahan

Kamil

Tobin

(1982) Cloze as a measure of intersentential comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly 17: 229-55.

70.

Schumacker

Lomax

(2004) A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

71.

Sheoery

Mokhtari

(2001) Coping with academic materials: differences in the reading strategies of native and non-native readers. System 29: 431-49.

72.

Sheorey

Mokhtari

(2008) Differing perceptions of reading strategy use between native and non-native college students. In: Mokhtari

Sheorey

(eds) Reading Strategies of First – and Second Language Learners. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon, 24-42.

73.

Song

(2005) Language learner strategy use and English proficiency on the Michigan English Language Assessment Battery. Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment 3: 1-23.

74.

Song

Cheng

(2006) Language learner strategy use and test performance of Chinese learners of English. Language Assessment Quarterly 3: 243-66.

75.

Vann

Abraham

(1990) Strategies of Unsuccessful Language Learners. TESOL Quarterly 24: 177-98.

76.

Wen

Johnson

(1997) L2 learner variables and English achievement: a study of tertiary-level English majors in China. Applied Linguistics 18: 27-48.

77.

Wenden

(1998) Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics 19(4): 515-37.

78.

Wenden

Rubin

(1987) Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

79.

Zhang

(2001) Awareness in reading: EFL students’ metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness 10: 268-88.

80.

Zhang

(2002) Exploring EFL reading as a metacognitive experience: reader awareness and reading performance. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching 12: 65-90.

81.

Zhang

(2003) Research into Chinese EFL learner strategies: methods, findings and instructional issues. RELC Journal 34: 284-322.

82.

Zhang

(2008) Constructivist pedagogy in strategic reading instruction: exploring pathways to learner development in the English as a second language (ESL) classroom. Instructional Science 36: 89-116.

83.

Zhang

(2010) A dynamic metacognitive systems account of Chinese university students’ knowledge about EFL reading. TESOL Quarterly 44: 320-53.

84.

Zhang

Anual

(2008) The role of vocabulary in reading Comprehension: the case of secondary school students learning English in Singapore. RELC Journal 39: 52-77.

85.

Zhang

and Hu

(2008) A cognitive perspective on Singaporean bilingual children’s use of reading strategies in learning to read in English. British Journal of Educational Psychology 78: 245-71.