This article distinguishes homonymy, homophony, homography amd polysemy, and provides a list of the most frequent homonyms using corpus-derived data. For most of the homonyms, the most common meaning accounts for 90% or more of the total uses of the form. The pedagogical and research implications of these findings are discussed.
BoersF (2000) Enhancing metaphoric awareness in specialised reading. English for Specific Purposes19(2): 137-47.
2.
BoersF (2000a) Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics21(4): 553-71.
3.
CoxheadA (2000) A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly34(2): 213-38.
4.
GardnerD (2007) Validating the construct of ‘word’ in applied corpus-based research: a critical survey. Applied Linguistics28(2): 241-65.
5.
HoeyM (2005) Lexical Priming. London: Routledge.
6.
LauferB (1989) A factor of difficulty in vocabulary learning: deceptive transparency. AILA Review6: 10-20.
7.
LauferB (1997) The lexical plight in second language reading: words you don’t know, words you think you know and words you can’t guess. In: CoadyJHuckinT (eds) Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
PanmanO (1982) Homonymy and polysemy. Lingua58: 105-36.
9.
RuhlC (1989) On Monosemy: A Study in Linguistic Semantics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
10.
ThorndikeEL (1932) Teacher’s Word Book of 20,000 Words. New York: Teachers College Columbia.
