The study discusses the dynamics English language instruction in the Philippine basic
education curriculum. Although English enjoyed immense popularity as early as 1900s
during the American entry to the country, its role in Philippine education has
transformed gradually as the country undergoes political, social and economic
reconstruction in the past decades. This paper analyzes the English instruction in
secondary education in the framework of systems thinking. It discusses in detail how
English instruction in the Philippines can be understood in the context of its role
in education.
Asian Development Bank1999Project Performance Audit Report on the Secondary Education Development Sector
Project in the Philippines.
2.
Bago, A.2001Curriculum Development: The Philippine Experience (
Manila: De La Salle University Press
).
3.
Bernardo, A.2004‘McKinley’s Questionable Bequest: Over 100 Years of
English in Philippine Education’
, World Englishes23.1:
17-31
.
4.
Berry, G.2002‘Towards Quality Systems Development in NSW Public Schools’
, School Effectiveness and School Improvement13.2:
201-223
.
5.
Betts, F.1992‘How Systems Thinking Applies to Education’
, Educational Leadership50(3):
38-41
.
6.
Bierama, L.2003‘Systems Thinking: A New Lens for Old Problems’
, The Journal of Continuing Education in Health Professions23.1:
S27-S33
.
7.
1972General Policies on Education (1967-1972) (
Manila, Philippines: Board of National Education
).
8.
Corson, A.1978The Story of Philippine Education (
Quezon City, Philippines: New Day Publishers
).
9.
Cotter, M.1998‘Using Systems Thinking to Improve Education’
, About Campus2.6:
9-14
.
10.
Educational Survey Commission 1925 Educational Survey of the Philippines.
11.
2003Language Planning in multilingual countries: The case of the Philippines.
Retrieved from www.sil.org/asia/ldc/plenary_papers/andrew_gonzales.pdf.
on 21 October, 2005 (URL1).
12.
Hughes, C.
, and
M. Tight1995‘The Myth of the Learning Society’
, British Journal of Educational Studies43.3:
290-304
.
13.
Isaacson, N.
, and
J. Bamburg1992‘Can Schools Become Learning Organizations?’
, Educational Leadership50.3:
42-44
.
14.
Kim, D.1994The Toolbox Reprint Series (
USA: Pegasus Communications)
.
15.
Lynn Jenks, C.2004‘Missing Links in the Public School Curriculum: Four Dimensions
for Change’
, World Futures60.1:
195-216
.
16.
Prator, C.1956Language Teaching in the Philippines (
Manila: US Educational Foundation)
.
17.
Senge, P.1994The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (
USA: Currency Doubleday)
.
18.
Smolicz, J.
,
I. Nical
and
M. Secombe
2002
‘Assimilation or Pluralism? Changing Policies for Minority
Languages Education in Australia and the Philippines’
, paper presented on Language Policies in Barcelona, Spain.
19.
The Congressional Commission on Education1993The Educational Ladder Book Two: Making Education work (
Quezon City, Philippines: Congressional
Oversight Committee on Education)
.
20.
Thornton, B.
,
G. Peltier
and
G. Perreault2004‘Systems Thinking: A Skill to Improve Student Achievement’
, Clearing House77.5:
222-227
.
