Essay Assist—Developing Software for Writing Skills Improvement in Partnership with Students

Abstract

School- and university-based writing tasks make demands on cognitive processing and socio-cultural knowledge that vary with the discipline in which the writing is situated. The variation in socio-cognitive demands makes the use of self-accessed, computer-mediated writing instruction more promising than conventional, teacher-fronted instruction. To be effective, self-accessed writing instruction should be constructed in partnership with student writers whose composing problems would form the basis of the content and organization of the instructional package. This paper demonstrates how a socio-cognitive model of writing informs the development of Essay Assist, a computer programme for guiding students towards appropriate decisions in the essay writing process. Results of a preliminary trial are reported and their implications discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bereiter, C. , and M. Scardamalia 1987 The Psychology of Written Composition ( Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum ).

Berkenkotter, C. , and T.N. Huckin 1995 Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power ( Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum ).

Originally printed in Pre/Text 3.3 (1982): 75-104 .

Brown, S.J. , A. Collins and P. Duguid 1989 ‘Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning’ , Educational Researcher 18.1: 32-42 .

Chandrasegaran, A. 1999 Language Instructional Issues in Asian Classrooms (ed. Y.M. Cheah and S.M. Ng ; Newark, DE: International Development in Asia Committee, International Reading Association ).

Cooper, M. , and M. Holzman 1989 Writing as Social Action ( Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers ).

1981 ‘A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing’ , College Composition and Communication 32.4: 365-387 .

1997 ‘Situating “Genre” and Situated Genres. Understanding Student Writing from a Genre Perspective’, in W. Bishop and H. Ostrom (eds.) Genre and Writing ( Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook ): 179-189.

Hirose, K. , and M. Sasaki 1994 ‘Explanatory Variables for Japanese Students’ Expository Writing in English: An Exploratory Study’ , Journal of Second Language Writing 3: 203-229 .

10.

Johns, A. 1991 ‘Faculty Assessment of ESL Student Literacy Skills: Implications for Writing Assessment’, in L. Hamp-Lyons (ed.), Assessing Second Language Writing in Academic Contexts ( Norwood, NJ: Ablex ): 167-179.

11.

Lave, J. 1991 ‘Situating Learning in Communities of Practice’, in L.B. Resnick , J.M. Levine and S.D. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition ( Washington, DC: American Psychological Association ): 63-82.

12.

Originally printed in Quarterly Journal of Speech 70 (1984): 151-167 .

13.

St Julien, J. 1997 ‘Explaining Learning: The Research Trajectory of Situated Cognition and the Implications of Connectionism’, in D. Kirshner and D.J. Whitson (eds.), Situated Cognition. Social, Semiotic, and Psychological Perspectives ( Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum ): 261-279.

14.

Wong, T.C.F. 2000 ‘Electronic Text vs Conventional Print’ (Unpublished MA thesis, National University of Singapore, Singapore).