This paper re-visits, in the light of a recent survey in Hong Kong, issues in
relation to how people are represented in educational materials for
language-learners. Consideration is given to stereotyping in the way men and women
are depicted and broader questions concerning the ‘visibility’
of women, the divorced and other groups, and the possible effects of such
representation on school-age learners.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Littlejohn, A.
, and
S. Windeatt1989‘Beyond Language Learning: Perspectives on Materials
Design’, in
R.K. Johnson
(ed.), The Second Language Curriculum (
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
): 155-175.
2.
McGrath, I.2002Materials Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching (
Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
).
3.
Porreca, K.1984‘Sexism in Current ESL Textbooks’
, TESOL Quarterly18.4:
705-724
.
4.
Tickoo, M.1995‘Materials for a State-Level System: A Retrospective
Record’, in
A. Hidalgo
,
D. Hall
and
G. Jacobs
(eds.), Getting Started: Materials Writers on Materials Writing (
Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre
): 31-44.
5.
Women in EFL Materials1991On Balance: Guidelines for the Representation of Women and Men in English
Language Teaching Materials. (
Obtainable from Women in EFL Materials, c/o Place Farm House, Chilton,
Didcot, Oxfordshire, X11 OSF, UK
).
6.
2002 www.eoc.org.hk (from the EOC’s homepage, choose
English, then Resources Centre, then News Releases 2002, and finally click on the
item for 15/04/2002: EOC Research findings on stereotyping: a call for diversity).
