The usefulness of the software program, Systemics 1.0 (O'Halloran and Judd 2002) for research and teaching Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) is examined in this paper. Systemics 1.0 is software which contains a pre-programmed SFL grammar at the rank of word, word group, clause, clause complex and discourse stratum. The software is designed to overcome the physical constraints of text analysis through features such as pull-down menus containing the grammatical systems, and search and print facilities. As the 'standard' grammar in Systemics 1.0 can be modified, discourse analyses undertaken with the software can incorporate other theoretical per spectives. Following a discussion of the functionality of the software, the ways in which the design features and interfaces in Systemics 1.0 shape the users' perceptions of systemic functional theory and practice are considered. This includes a discussion of the limitations of the program, together with recommendations for possible future developments in SFL software.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baldry, A. (ed.) 2000Multimodality and Multimediality in the Distance Learning Age (Campobasso , Italy: Palladino Editore).
2.
Baldry, A. in progress Multimodal Corpus Authoring (MCA) System (Pavia: University of Pavia).
3.
Bauersfeld, P.1994Software by Design: Creating People Friendly Software for the Macintosh (New York: MIS Press).
4.
Bloor T., and M. Bloor1995The Functional Analysis of English: A Hallidayan Approach ( New York: Arnold).
5.
Chaib, M. (ed.) 2002Perspectives on Human-Computer Interactions: A Multidisciplinary Approach (Lund: Studentlitteratur).
6.
Christie, F., and J.R. Martin (eds.) 1997Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School (London: Continuum).
7.
Coffin, C.1997'Constructing and Giving Value to the Past: An Investigation into Second School History', in Christie and Martin 1997: 196-230.
8.
Davis, A.M.1995201 Principles of Software Development ( New York: McGraw-Hill).
9.
Descartes, R.1952Descartes' Philosophical Writings (ed. and trans. Norman Kemp Smith; London: Macmillan).
10.
Downton, A. (ed.) 1992Engineering the Human-Computer Interface (London: McGraw-Hill).
11.
Droga, L., and S. Humphrey2002Getting Started with Functional Grammar ( Berry, NSW: Target Texts).
12.
Eggins, S.1994An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics (London: Pinter).
13.
Eggins, S., and D. Slade1997Analysing Casual Conversation (London : Continuum).
14.
Foley, J. forthcoming Language in Discourse (RELC Portfolio Series; Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre).
15.
Halliday, M.A.K.1978Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning (London: Arnold).
16.
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar ( London: Arnold [1981]).
17.
Kress, G.2000'Multimodality', in B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures (London: Routledge): 182-202.
18.
2003Literacy in the New Media Age (London: Routledge).
19.
Kress, G., et al. 2001Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom (London: Continuum).
20.
Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen2001Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication Discourse (London: Arnold).
21.
Lemke, J.L.2000 'Multimedia Demands of the Scientific Curriculum', Linguistics and Education10.3 (Special Edition: Language and Other Semiotic Systems in Education): 247-71.
22.
2003'Mathematics in the Middle: Measure, Picture, Gesture, Sign, and Word', in M. Anderson et al. (eds.), Educational Perspectives on Mathematics as Semiosis: From Thinking to Interpreting to Knowing (Ottawa: Legas): 215-34.
23.
Martin, J.R.1992English Text: System and Structure ( Amsterdam: John Benjamins).
24.
1997'Analysing Genre: Functional Parameters', in Christie and Martin 1997: 3-39.
25.
2000'Beyond Exchange: APPRAISAL Systems in English', in S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in Text ( Oxford: Oxford University Press): 142-75.
26.
Martin, J.R., M.I.M. Matthiessen and C. Painter1997Working with Functional Grammar (London : Arnold).
27.
Martin, J.R., and D. Rose2003Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause (London: Continuum).
28.
Matthiessen, C.M.I.M.1988'Representational Issues in Systemic Functional Grammar' , in J.D. Benson and W.S. Greaves (eds.), Systemic Functional Approaches to Discourse (Norwood, NJ: Ablex ): 136-75.
29.
O'Halloran, K.L.1996 'The Discourses of Secondary School Mathematics' (PhD Thesis, Murdoch University, Western Australia).
O'Halloran, K.L., and K. Judd2002Systemics 1.0 (Singapore: Singapore University Press).
32.
Persson, R.S.2002'Pandora's Box Revisited: On Information Technology, Technostress, Virtual Addition and the Effects of Information Overload', in Chaib 2002: 17-49.
33.
Pike, K.L.1982Linguistic Concepts: An Introduction to Tagmemics (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press).
34.
Preece, J. (ed.), written by D. Benyon, G. Davies, L. Keller, J. Preece and Y. Rogers 1993A Guide to Usability: Human Factors in Computing (Wokingham: Addison-Wesley).
35.
Rampton, B., et al. 2002 'Methodology in the Analysis of Classroom Discourse', Applied Linguistics, 23.3: 373-92.
36.
Thomas, P.J. (ed.) 1995The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human—Computer Interfaces ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Ventola, E., C. Charles and M. Kaltenbacher (eds.) forthcoming Perspectives on Multimodality (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).
39.
White, P.R.R.1997'Death, Disruption and the Moral Order: The Narrative Impulse in Mass-Media "hard news" Reporting', in Christie and Martin 1997: 101-133.
