Ganschow and Sparks (1991), reckoning on the correctness of their Linguistic Coding Deficit/Difference Hypothesis (LCDH) to attribute the main source of foreign language learning difficulties to language- based problems, rather than to affective variables, attempted to extend its validity by devising a Foreign Language Screening Instrument for Colleges (FLSI-C) in the USA. The author of this study here proposes to test whether the hypothesis holds for language learning difficulties among Chinese-speaking college students learning English as a foreign language (FL) in Taiwan, and presents evidence for the following two propositions: (1) that a modified Chinese language version of the FLSI-C is a valid and reliable instrument, and (2) that the high-risk and no-risk students identified by the modified instrument differ on the Chinese Language Aptitude Test (CLAT) and, according to self-reports, on the Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS) developed by Horwitz et al. These propositions are accordingly vindicated and lead the author to affirm the validity of the LCDH for interpreting difficulties encountered by Chinese college learners of English.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brown, D.H.1991. Breaking the language barrier: creating your own pathway to success. Yarmouth Intercultural Press, Inc.
2.
Brown, D.H.1994. Principles of language learning and teaching. Third editionEnglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Regents.
3.
Chen H. C., and Tzeng, O. J. L. (Eds). 1992. Language processing in Chinese . Amsterdam: Elsevieer Science Publishers B. V.
4.
Chen, T.Y.1997a. Identifying language learning factors among junior college students through diary studies. Paper from Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on English Teaching in the Republic of China . 81-93. Taipei, Taiwan: The Crane.
5.
Chen, T.Y.1997b. Foreign language learning frustration: Insight from diary studies. Paper from Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on English Teaching. 59-79. Taipei , Taiwan: The Crane.
6.
Diller, K. C. (Ed.). 1981. Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude. Rowley, MA: Neubury House.
7.
Ehrman, M.E.1996. Understanding second language learning difficulties . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Ellis, R.1985. Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
9.
Ganschow, L., and Sparks, R.1986. Learning disabilities and foreign language difficulties: deficit in listening skills? Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International2: 305-319.
10.
Ganschow, L., and Sparks, R.1991. A screening instrument for the identification of foreign language learning problems. Foreign Language Annals24: 383-398.
11.
Ganschow, L., and Sparks, R.1993. Foreign language learning disabilities: Issues, research, and teaching implications. Success for College Students with Learning Disabilities . Edited by S. Vogel and P. Adelman.283-320. New York: Springer-Verlag.
12.
Ganschow, L., and Sparks, R.1996. Anxiety about foreign language learning among high school women. The Modern Language Journal80: 199-212.
13.
Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., and Schneider. E.1995. Learning a foreign language: challenges for students with language learning disabilities. Dyslexia1: 75-95.
14.
Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., and Javorsky. J.1998. Foreign language learning difference: an historical perspective . Journal of Learning Disabilities31: 248-258.
15.
Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., Javorsky. J., Pohlman, J., and Bishop-Marbury, A.1991. Identifying native language difficulties among foreign language learners in college: a "foreign" language learning disability? Journal of Learning Disabilities24: 530-541.
16.
Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., Anderson, R., Javorsky, J., Skinner, S., and Patton. J., 1994. Differences in anxiety and language performance among high and low anxious college foreign language learners. The Modern Language Journal78: 41-55.
17.
Gardner, R.C.1990. Attitudes, motivation, and personality as predictors of success in foreign language learning. Language Aptitude Reconsidered . Edited by T. S. Parry, and C. W. Stansfield. 179-214. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
Gass, S.M., and Selinker, L.1994. Second language acquisition: an introductory course . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19.
Horwitz, E., and Young, D.1991. Language anxiety: from theory and research to classroom implications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.
20.
Larsen-Freeman, D., and Long, M.H.1991. An introduction to second language acquisition research . NY: Longman.
21.
Lu, C.Y., Lu, C.M., and Ou T.H.1997. Multiple Factors Aptitude Test. Chinese Behavior Science Corporation. Taipei, Taiwan.
22.
Oxford, R.1990. Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House .
23.
Oxford, R. (Ed.). 1996. Language learning motivation: pathways to the new century. Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
24.
Skehan, P.1989. Individual differences in second language learning . London: Edward Arnold.
25.
Sparks, R.1995. Examining the linguistic coding difference hypothesis to explain individual differences in foreign language learning. Annals of Dyslexia45: 187-214.
26.
Sparks, R., Artzer, M., Ganschow, L., Jovorsky, J., Miller, K., and Hordubay, D.1998. Students classified as learning disabled and non-learning disabled: two comparison studies of native language skill, foreign language aptitude, and foreign language proficiency. Foreign Language Annals31: 535-551.
27.
Sparks, R., and Ganschow, L.1991. Foreign language learning differences: affective or native language aptitude differences? The Modern Language Journal75: 3-16.
28.
Sparks, R., and Ganschow, L.1993a. The impact of native language learning problems on foreign language learning: case study illustrations of the linguistic coding deficit hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal77: 58-74.
29.
Sparks, R., and Ganschow, L.1993b. Searching for the cognitive locus of foreign language learning difficulties: linking first and second language learning. The Modern Language Journal77: 289-302.
30.
Sparks, R., and Ganschow, L.1995. A strong inference approach to causal factors in foreign language learning: a response to Maclntyre. The Modern Language Journal79: 253-248.
31.
Sparks, R., and Ganschow, L.1996. Teachers' perceptions of students' foreign language academic skills and affective characteristics. The Journal of Educational Research89: 172-185.
32.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., and Pohlman, J.1989. Linguistic coding deficits in foreign language learners . Annals of Dyslexia39: 179-195.
33.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., and Javorsky. J.1993. Perceptions of low and high risk students and students with learning disabilities about high school foreign language courses. Foreign Language Annals26: 491-510.
34.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Javorsky, J.Pohlman, J., and Patton, J.1992a. Test comparison among students identified as high-risk, low-risk, and learning disabled in high school foreign language courses. The Modern Language Jouenal76: 142-159.
35.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Javorsky, J., Pohlman, J., and Patton, J.1992b. Identifying native language deficits in high-and low risk foreign language learners in high school. Foreign Language Annals25: 403-418.
36.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Patton, J., Artzer, M., Siebenhar, D., and Plageman. M.1997. Prediction of foreign language proficiency. Journal of Educational Psychology89: 549-561.
