Texts are a form of technology: they do things. They construct meanings to achieve social purposes. In this paper I shall argue that the power-tool of the technology of text is grammatical metaphor. It is grammatical metaphor which is the key to constructing the meanings of those genres valued by the institutions of education, the professions and bureaucracy. Success in these institutions is linked to the mastery of grammatical metaphor as a tool for making meanings in reading and writing. It is therefore important for teachers, including ESL teachers, to become conscious of this tool, how it works, how to use it and how to exploit it for pedagogical purposes, so that all our students can master it, and the kinds of texts it enables them to construct.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asmah Haji Omar.1982. The Malaysian National Language in Academic Discourse . In Language and Society in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
2.
Bernstein, B.1987. Elaborated and restricted codes: an overview 1958 - 85 . In Ulrich Ammon, N. Dittmar and Klaus J. Matthier (eds.), Sociolinguistics/Soziolinguistik: an international handbook Vol. 1. Berlin: W de Gruyter.
3.
Butt, D., R. Fahey, S. Spinks & C. Yallop.1993. Using Functional Grammar: An Explorer's Guide. Sydney: Macquarie University , NCELTR (National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Sydney).
4.
Chew, M. and Tan, C.W.1991. Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah: English Form 5. Selangor Darul Ehsan: System
5.
Christie, F.1992. Literacy in Australia. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 142-155.
6.
Cook-Gumperz, J. (ed.). 1986. The social construction of literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Cope, B. and M. Kalantzis (eds.). 1993. The Powers of Literacy: A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing. London: The Falmer Press.
8.
Cullip, P.1996. Constructing Knowledge across Cultures: how the discourse of history 'works' in the Malaysian context. MEd Thesis. Darwin: Faculty of Education, Northern Territory University .
9.
Derewianka, B.1990. How Texts Work. Rozelle, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association.
10.
Eggins, S.1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Frances Pinter.
11.
Eggins, S., P. Wignell and J.R. Martin.1987. The discourse of history: distancing the recoverable past. In Suzanne Eggins, James R. Martin and Peter Wignell (eds), Writing Project Report 1987. Sydney: University of Sydney Linguistics Department (Working Papers in Linguistics, 5).
12.
Fries, P.H.1997. Theme and New in Written English. In T. Miller (ed.), Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. Washington: United States Information Agency (English Language Programs).
13.
Gerot, L. and P. Wignell.1994. Making Sense of Functional Grammar: The introductory workbook for every teacher. (Making Sense of Language Series, 1). Cammeray, NSW: AEE.
14.
Halliday, M.A.K.1973. Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.
15.
Halliday, M.A.K.1975. Learning How to Mean: explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold .
16.
Halliday, M.A.K.1978. Language as a Social Semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
17.
Halliday, M.A.K.1985. Spoken and Written Language. Geelong , Victoria: Deakin University Press (Language and Learning Series).
18.
Halliday, M.A.K.1993. The Analysis of Scientific Texts in English and Chinese . In M.A.K. Halliday & J. R. Martin, 1993: Writing Science: literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer (Critical perspectives on literacy and education) and Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press (Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy and Culture).
19.
Halliday, M.A.K.1994. Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Edward Arnold .
20.
Halliday, M.A.K.1996. Literacy and linguistics: a functional perspective. In R. Hasan and G. Williams (eds.), Literacy in Society. London: Longman.
21.
Halliday, M.A.K. and R. Hasan.1985. Language, Context and Text: a social semiotic perspective. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press (Language and Learning Series).
22.
Halliday, M.A.K. and J.R. Martin.1993. Writing Science: literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer (Critical perspectives on literacy and education) and Pittsburgh : University of Pittsburgh Press (Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy and Culture).
23.
Hammond, J., A. Burns, H. Joyce, D. Brosnan and L. Gerot.1992. English for social purposes: A handbook for teachers of adult English. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
24.
Heath, S.B.1983. Ways with words: language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Ivanic, R. and J. Simpson.1992. Putting the People Back into Academic Writing. Literacy for the Twenty-first Century (proceedings of conference)Oxford: Oxford University Press .
26.
Jones, J.1990. Grammatical Metaphor and Technicality in Academic Writing - an exploration of ESL (English as a Second Language) and NS (Native Speaker) student texts. In Frances Christie (ed.), Literacy in Social Processes: Papers from the Inaugural Australian Systemic Functional Linguisics Conference, January 1990.
27.
Jones, J., S. Gollin, H. Drury, D. Economou.1989. Systemic-functional linguistics and its application to the TESOL curriculum. In R. Hasan and J.R. Martin (eds.) Language Development: Learning Language, Learning Culture, 1st ed. New Jersey: Able.
28.
Kopple, W.J.1997. Using the Concepts of Given Information and New Information in Classes on the English Language. In T. Miller (ed.), Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. Washington: United States Information Agency (English Language Programs).
29.
Luke, A.1996. Genres of Power? Literacy education and the production of capital. In R. Hasan and G. Williams (eds.), Literacy in Society. London: Longman.
30.
Martin, J.R.1984. Language, Register and Genre. In Children Writing: Reader. Geelong, Victoria : Deakin University Press.
31.
Martin, J.R.1985. Factual writing: exploring and challenging social reality . Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
32.
Martin, J.R.1989. Technicality and Abstraction: Language for the creation of specialised texts. In Writing in Schools, Reader. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
33.
Martin, J.R.1991. Nominalisation in Science and Humanities: distilling knowledge and scaffolding text. In E. Ventola (ed.), Recent Systemic and other Functional Views on Language. Berlin: de Gruyter.
34.
Martin, J.R.1992. English Text: system and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
35.
Martin, J.R.1993. Genre and Literacy - modeling context in educational linguistics . Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 141-172: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Martin, J.R.1997. Waves of Abstraction: organising exposition.. In T. Miller (ed.), Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications. Washington: United States Information Agency (English Language Programs).
37.
Martin, J.R., P. Wignell, S. Eggins and J. Rothery.1988. Secret English: Discourse technology in a junior secondary school. In L. Gerot , J. Oldenburg and T. Van Leeuwen (eds), Language and Socialisation: Home and School. Proceedings from the Working Conference on Language in Education , Macquarie University, Sydney.
38.
Murray, D.E.1995. Knowledge Machines: language and information in a technological society. New York: Longman.
39.
Noor Azlina Yunus and A. Fernandez .1989. Kurikulum Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah: English Form 3. Shah Alam: Fajar Bakti.
40.
Ravelli, L.J.1985. Metaphor, Mode and Complexity: an exploration of co-varying patterns. Fourth Year Honours Thesis, Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney.
41.
Ravelli, L.J.1988. Grammatical metaphor: an initial analysis. In Steiner and Veltman (eds.) Pragmatics, Discourse and Text: some systemically inspired approaches . London: Pinter.
42.
Solomon, N.1995. Plain English: from a perspective of language in society . In R. Hasan and G. Williams (eds.), Literacy in Society. London: Longman.
43.
Street, B.1995. Social Literacies: critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. New York: Longman.
44.
Thomson, G.1996. Introducing Functional Grammar. London & New York: Arnold.
45.
Wignell, P.1991. 'Doing' and 'Making' Social Science: The Role of 'Main Ideas' in the Social Literacy Social Science Materials. In Genre Approaches to Literacy: Theories and Practices, Papers from the 1991 LERN Conference, University of Technology, Sydney.
46.
Wignell, P., S. Eggins and J. Martin.1987. The discourse of geography: ordering and explaining the experiential world. In Working Papers in Linguistics, 5. Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, pp. 25 - 65.
