Writing,Knowledge Construction and Idea Framing

Abstract

This paper is based on a small scale investigation into the way knowledge is constructed and the way ideas are framed (developed and linked with each other) in writing by overseas students on a British undergraduate programme. This paper applies the taxonomy of idea framing, which has been developed from the analysis of group interaction patterns (speaking) of the same students in academic settings, to the analysis of written data, comparing the differences and similarities between writing and speaking in terms of idea framing and knowledge construction. Two major types of idea framing are discussed: reactive framing and additive framing. This paper aims to examine the different patterns of framing of ideas employed by students in writing (the multi-dimensionality of knowledge construction and idea framing in writing) and also discusses the pedagogical implications of the study.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, J.R. 1980. Cognitive psychology and its implications. (second edition). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company .

Bakhtin, M.M. 1986. Speech genres and other late essays. ( C. Emerson and M. Holquist (Eds.)). Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bernstein, Basil. 1971. On the classification and framing of educational knowledge . In Michael F. D. Young (Ed.). Knowledge and control (New directions for the sociology of education). London: Collin Macmillan . 47-69.

Clark, Romy and Ivanic, Roz. 1997. The politics of writing. London and New York: Routledge.

Cortazzi, M. 1993. Narrative analysis. UK: Falmer Press.

Freedman, Aviva ; Pringle, Ian and Yalden, Janice. (Eds.). 1983. Learning to write: First languagelsecond language . London and New York: Longman .

Harris, Karen R. and Graham, Steve. 1992. Self-regulated strategy development: A part of the writing process. In Michael Pressley , Karen R. Harris and John T. Guthrie. (Eds.). Promoting academic competence and literacy in school. New York: Academic Press, Inc. 277-309.

Hofmann, Th. R. 1993. Realms of meaning (An introduction to semantics) London: Longman.

Kinneavy, James L. 1983. A pluralistic synthesis of four contemporary models for teaching composition. In Aviva Freedman , Ian Pringle and Janice Yalden. (Eds.). Learning to write: First language/second language . London and New York: Longman. pp. 121-138.

10.

Labov, W. and Waletzky, J. 1967. Narrative analysis. In J. Helm. (Ed.). Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press . 12-44.

11.

Lotman, Yu. M. 1988. Text within a text. Soviet psychology 26/3: 32-51.

12.

Odell, Lee. 1983. Redefining maturity in writing. In Aviva Freedman , Ian Pringle and Janice Yalden. (Eds.). Learning to write: First language/second language. London and New York: Longman . 98-113.

13.

Swales, John and Hazem, Najjar. 1987. The writing of research article introductions. Written Communication 4: 175-92.

14.

Swales, John. 1981. Aspects of article introductions. Birmingham, UK: The University of Aston, Language Studies Unit.

15.

Tin, Tan Bee and Randall, Mick. 'A study of group interaction patterns in academic settings'(accepted for publication in CLE Working Papers, University of Southampton )

16.

West Sussex Institute of Higher Education. 1992. Proposal for a B.Ed. (Hons.) TESOL (secondary) to be taught in a linked mode between West Sussex Institute of Higher Education and Maktab Perguruan Ilmu Khas (Specialist Teachers' Training Institute), Malaysia. Volume 1. Definitive document. December 1992.

17.

Young, Michael F. D. 1971. An approach to the study of curricula as socially organized knowledge. In Michael F. D. Young (Ed.). Knowledge and control (New directions for the sociology of education) . London: Collin Macmillan . 19-46.