CasalC. S.LeiA.YoungS. L.TuthillE. L. (2017). A critical review of instruments measuring breastfeeding attitudes, knowledge, and social support. Journal of Human Lactation, 33(1), 21–47.
4.
ColquhounH. L.LevacD.O’BrienK. K.StrausS.TriccoA. C.PerrierL.. . . MoherD. (2014). Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(12), 1291–1294. doi:10.1016/jclinepi.2014.03.013
5.
EdenJ.LevitL.BergA.MortonS. (2011). Finding what works in health care: Standards for systematic reviews. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
6.
HigginsJ.P.T.GreenS. (Eds.). (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Southgate, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration and John Wiley & Sons.
7.
LiberatiA.AltmanD. G.TetzlaffJ.MulrowC.GøtzscheP. C.IoannidisJ.P.A.. . . MoherD. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000100. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
ManantA. L.DodgsonJ. E. (2011). Centering pregnancy: An integrative review. Journal of Nurse Midwifery and Women’s Health, 56(2), 94–102.
10.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G., &. PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e10000997. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
11.
MoherD.ShamseerL.ClarkeM.GhersiD.LiberatiA.PetticrewM.ShekelleP.StewartL. A., & PRISMA-P Group (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1.
12.
ParéG.TrudelM. C.JaanaM.KitsiouS. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, 52, 183–199. doi:10.1016/j.im2014.08.008
13.
PerrierL.LightfootD.KealeyM. R.StrausS. E.TriccoA. C. (2016) Knowledge synthesis research: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology73, 50–57. doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.02.019
14.
Spiesser-RobeletL.BrunieV.de AndradeV.GagnayreR. (2017). Knowledge, representations, attitudes, and behaviors of women faced with taking medications while breastfeeding: A scoping review. Journal of Human Lactation, 33(1), 98–114.
15.
StampK. D.MachadoM. A.AllenN. A. (2014). Transitional care programs improved outcomes for heart patients: An integrative review. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 29(2), 140–154.
16.
TriccoA. C.LillieE.ZarinW.O’BrienK.ColquhounH.KastnerM.. . . StrausS. E. (2016). A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16(15). doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4
17.
WhittemoreR.ChaoA.JangM.MingesK. E.ParkC. (2014). Methods for knowledge synthesis: An overview. Heart & Lung, 43, 453–461. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.05.014
18.
WhittemoreR.KnaflK. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553.