Testing for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is the key first step in HIV treatment and prevention. In 2006, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended annual HIV testing for people at high risk for HIV infection. We evaluated HIV testing among men with high-risk heterosexual (HRH) contact and sexually active men who have sex with men (MSM) before and after the CDC recommendations.
Methods.
We used data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 2002 and 2006–2010, to assess proportions of HRH respondents and MSM reporting HIV testing in the prior 12 months, compare rates of testing before and after release of the 2006 CDC HIV testing guidelines, and examine demographic variables and receipt of health-care services as correlates of HIV testing.
Results.
Among MSM, the proportion tested was 37.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 28.2, 47.2) in 2002, 38.2% (95% CI 25.9, 52.2) in 2006–2008, and 41.7% (95% CI 29.2, 55.3) in 2008–2010; among HRH respondents, the proportion was 23.7% (95% CI 20.5, 27.3) in 2002, 24.5% (95% CI 20.9, 28.7) in 2006–2008, and 23.9% (95% CI 20.2, 28.1) in 2008–2010. HIV testing was more likely among MSM and HRH respondents who received testing or treatment for sexually transmitted disease in the prior 12 months, received a physical examination in the prior 12 months (MSM only), or were incarcerated in the prior 12 months.
Conclusions.
The rate of annual HIV testing was low for men with sexual risk for HIV infection, and little improvement took place from 2002 to 2006–2010. Interventions aimed at men at risk, especially MSM, in both nonmedical and health-care settings, likely could increase HIV testing.
References
1.
PrejeanJSongRHernandezAZiebellRGreenTWalkerF, Estimated HIV incidence in the United States, 2006–2009. PloS One2011;6:e17502.
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). Estimated HIV incidence in the United States, 2007–2010. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report, 2012; vol. 17 [cited 2014 Jul 12]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/statistics_hssr_vol_17_no_4.pdf.
3.
BiedrzyckiPVergerontJGasiorowiczMBertolliJOsterASpikesPS, Increase in newly diagnosed HIV infections among young black men who have sex with men—Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, 1999–2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2011;60(4):99–102.
4.
BradleyHHallHIWolitskiRJVan HandelMMStoneAELaFlamM, Vital signs: HIV diagnosis, care, and treatment among persons living with HIV—United States, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2014;63(47):1113–7.
5.
BransonBMHandsfieldHHLampeMAJanssenRSTaylorAWLyssSB, Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2006;55(RR-14):1–17.
6.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). National Survey of Family Growth [cited 2014 Jul 12]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg.htm.
7.
LepkowskiJMMosherWDDavisKEGrovesRMVan HoewykJ.The 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth: sample design and analysis of a continuous survey. Vital Health Stat22010(150).
8.
LepkowskiJMMosherWDDavisKEGrovesRMvan HoewykJWillemJ.National Survey of Family Growth, cycle 6: sample design, weighting, imputation, and variance estimation. Vital Health Stat 22006(142).
RTI International. SUDAAN®: Version 10. Research Triangle Park (NC): RTI International; 2012.
11.
WoodringJVKruszon-MoranDOsterAMMcQuillanGM. Did CDC's 2006 revised HIV testing recommendations make a difference? Evaluation of HIV testing in the US household population, 2003–2010. J Acquir Immun Defic Syndr2014;67:331–40.
12.
OsterAMMilesIWLeBCDiNennoEAWiegandREHeffelfingerJD, HIV testing among men who have sex with men—21 cities, United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2011;60(21):694–9.
13.
CooleyLAOsterAMRoseCEWejnertCLeBCPaz-BaileyG.Increases in HIV testing among men who have sex with men— National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System, 20 U.S. metropolitan statistical areas, 2008 and 2011. PloS One2014;9:e104162.
14.
WilliamsMLBowenAMHorvathKJ. The social/sexual environment of gay men residing in a rural frontier state: Implications for the development of HIV prevention programs. J Rural Health2005;21:48–55.
15.
HormesJMTheallKP. Accessibility and effectiveness of sources of information about HIV/AIDS in a rural population. South Med J2013;106:599–604.
16.
HarmonJLCollins-OgleMBartlettJAThompsonJBarrosoJ.Integrating routine HIV screening into a primary care setting in rural North Carolina. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care2014;25:70–82.
17.
OhlMTateJDuggalMSkandersonMScotchMKaboliP, Rural residence is associated with delayed care entry and increased mortality among veterans with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Med Care2010;48:1064–70.
18.
OhlMEPerencevichE.Frequency of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in urban vs. rural areas of the United States: Results from a nationally-representative sample. BMC Public Health2011;11:681.
19.
TrepkaMJFennieKPSheehanDMLutfiKMaddoxLLiebS.Late HIV diagnosis: Differences by rural/urban residence, Florida, 2007–2011. AIDS Patient Care STDS2014;28:188–97.
20.
BernsteinKTLiuKLBegierEMKoblinBKarpatiAMurrillC.Same-sex attraction disclosure to health care providers among New York City men who have sex with men: Implications for HIV testing approaches. Arch Intern Med2008;168:1458–64.
21.
MackellarDAHouSIWhalenCCSamuelsenKSanchezTSmithA, Reasons for not HIV testing, testing intentions, and potential use of an over-the-counter rapid HIV test in an Internet sample of men who have sex with men who have never tested for HIV. Sex Transm Dis2011;38:419–28.
22.
WhiteBLWalshJRayasamSPathmanDEAdimoraAAGolinCE. What makes me screen for HIV? Perceived barriers and facilitators to conducting recommended routine HIV testing among primary care physicians in the southeastern United States. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care2015;14:127–35.
23.
JohnsonCVMimiagaMJReisnerSLVanDerwarkerRMayerKH. Barriers and facilitators to routine HIV testing: Perceptions from Massachusetts Community Health Center personnel. AIDS Patient Care STDS2011;25:647–55.
24.
JainCLWyattCMBurkeRSepkowitzKBegierEM. Knowledge of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's 2006 routine HIV testing recommendations among New York City internal medicine residents. AIDS Patient Care STDS2009;23:167–76.
25.
MohajerMALyonsMKingEPrattJFichtenbaumCJ. Internal medicine and emergency medicine physicians lack accurate knowledge of current CDC HIV testing recommendations and infrequently offer HIV testing. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic)2012;11:101–8.
26.
ShirreffsALeeDPHenryJGoldenMRSteklerJD. Understanding barriers to routine HIV screening: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare providers in King County, Washington. PloS One2012;7:e44417.
27.
GardnerEMMcLeesMPSteinerJFDel RioCBurmanWJ. The spectrum of engagement in HIV care and its relevance to test-and-treat strategies for prevention of HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis2011;52:793–800.
28.
FriedenTRDas-DouglasMKellermanSEHenningKJ. Applying public health principles to the HIV epidemic. N Engl J Med2005;353:2397–402.
29.
BergLJDelgadoMKGindeAAMontoyJCBendavidECamargoCAJr., Characteristics of U.S. emergency departments that offer routine human immunodeficiency virus screening. Acad Emerg Med2012;19:894–900.
30.
HooverJBTaoGHeffelfingerJD. Monitoring HIV testing at visits to emergency departments in the United States: Very-low rate of HIV testing. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr2013;62:90–4.
31.
McQuillanGMKruszon-MoranD.HIV infection in the United States household population aged 18–49 years: Results from 1999–2006. NCHS Data Brief2008;(4):1–8.
32.
McQuillanGMKruszon-MoranDGranadeTFeldmanJW. Seroprevalence of human immunodeficiency virus in the US household population aged 18–49 years: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1999–2006. J Acquir Immun Defic Syndr2010;53:117–23.
33.
XuFSternbergMRMarkowitzLE. Men who have sex with men in the United States: Demographic and behavioral characteristics and prevalence of HIV and HSV-2 infection: Results from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001–2006. Sex Transm Dis2010;37:399–405.
