Regulation of Information Technology in Behavioral Health

Beckerman JZ Pritts J Goplerud E Leifer JC Borzi PA Rosenbaum S , A delicate balance: Behavioral health, patient privacy, and the need to know. Oakland (CA): California HealthCare Foundation; 2008. Also available from: URL: http://www.chcf.org/publications/2008/03/a-delicate-balance-behavioral-health-patient-privacy-and-the-need-to-know [cited 2015 Jan 20].

Gostin LO Hodge JG Jr Valdiserri RO , Informational privacy and the public/s health: The Model State Public Health Privacy Act. Am J Public Health 2001;91:1388–92.

Rapp RC Xu J Carr CA Lane T Wang J Carlson R. Treatment barriers identified by substance abusers assessed at a centralized intake unit. J Subst Abuse Treat 2006;30:227–35.

Marsch LA Lord SE Dallery J , editors. Behavioral healthcare and technology: Using science-based innovations to transform practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015.

Goldstein MM Rein AL , Data segmentation in electronic health information exchange: Policy considerations and analysis. Washington: Department of Health and Human Services (US), Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; 2010. Also available from: URL: http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/privacy-security/gwu-data-segmentation-final.pdf [cited 2015 Jan 20].

Thomson Reuters Foundation. Patient privacy in a mobile world: A framework to address privacy law issues in mobile health. London: Thomson Reuters Foundation; 2013. Also available from: URL: http://www.trust.org/contentAsset/raw-data/03172beb-0f11–438e-94be-e02978de3036/file [cited 2015 Jan 20].

Pub. L. No. 104–191, 110 Stat. 1936 (1996).

45 C.F.R. š160.203.

45 C.F.R. šš160, 164.

45 C.F.R. š164.103.

45 C.F.R. š164.506.

45 C.F.R. š164.512.

Goldstein MM Pewen WF , The HIPAA Omnibus Rule: Implications for public health policy and practice. Public Health Rep 2013;128:554–8.

Pub. L. No. 91–616, 84 Stat. 1848 (1970).

Pub. L. No. 92–255, 86 Stat. 65 (1972).

42 U.S.C. š290dd-2.

42 C.F.R. š2.11.

42 C.F.R. š2.12.

42 C.F.R. š2.51.

42 C.F.R. š2.3.

42 C.F.R. š2.3(b)(2).

Advisory Committee on Automated Personal Data Systems. Records, computers, and the rights of citizens. Report of the Secretary/s Advisory Committee on Automated Personal Data Systems. Washington: Department of Health, Education and Welfare (US); 1973. DHEW Pub. No. (OS)73–94.

15 U.S.C. š45(a)(1),(2).

15 U.S.C. š45(n).

15 U.S.C. š45(a)(4)(A).

FTC v. Toysmart.com, LLC, 2000 WL 34016434 (D. Mass. July 21, 2000) (unreported).

Federal Trade Commission (US). In the matter of HTC America Inc. FTC file no. 122 3049 (2013) (complaint) [cited 2015 Mar 8]. Available from: URL: http://ftc.gov/os/caselist/1223049/130702htccmpt.pdf.

Federal Trade Commission (US). In the matter of Google, Inc., a corporation. FTC file no. 102 3136 (2011) (complaint) [cited 2015 Jan 20]. Available from: URL: http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/1023136/index.shtm.

Federal Trade Commission (US). In the matter of Ceridian Corporation, a corporation. FTC file no. 102 3160 (2011) (complaint) [cited 2015 Jan 20]. Available from: URL: http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/1023160/index.shtm.

Federal Trade Commission (US). Mobile privacy disclosures: Building trust through transparency: A Federal Trade Commission staff report. February 2013 [cited 2015 Jan 20]. Available from: URL: www.ftc.gov/os/2013/02/130201mobileprivacyreport.pdf.

21 U.S.C. 321 š201(h).

Department of Health and Human Services (US), Food and Drug Administration (US). Mobile medical applications: Guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff. 2015 Feb 9 [cited 2015 Feb 17]. Available from: URL: http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/productsandmedicalprocedures/connectedhealth/mobilemedicalapplications/default.htm.

Department of Health and Human Services (US), Food and Drug Administration (US), Center for Devices and Radiological Health. General wellness: Policy for low risk devices: Draft guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff. 2015 [cited 2015 Jan 20]. Available from: URL: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Medical Devices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM429674.pdf.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US). Confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records: A proposed rule by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (notice of public listening session). 2014 May 12 [cited 2015 Jan 20]. Available from: URL: https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/05/12/2014–10913/confidentiality-of-alcohol-and-drug-abuse-patient-records.

Pub. L. No. 112–144, 126 Stat. 993, š618 (2012).

Department of Health and Human Services (US), Food and Drug Administration (US). FDASIA health IT report: Proposed strategy and recommendations for a risk-based framework. April 2014 [cited 2015 Jan 20]. Available from: URL: http://www.fda.gov/aboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CDRH/CDRHReports/ucm390588.htm.

The White House (US). Administration discussion draft: Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights Act of 2015. 2015 Feb 27 [cited 2015 Mar 5]. Available from: URL: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/legislative/letters/cpbr-act-of-2015-discussion-draft.pdf.

The White House (US). Consumer data privacy in a networked world: A framework for protecting privacy and promoting innovation in the global digital economy. February 2012 [cited 2015 Jan 20]. Available from: URL: www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/privacy-final.pdf.

The White House (US). Fact sheet: Safeguarding American consumers & families. 2015 Jan 12 [cited 2015 Jan 20]. Available from: URL: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/01/12/fact-sheet-safeguarding-american-consumers-families.

Orr E. 2011 in review: MDUFA, 510(k) debate made list of top news. Devices & Diagnostics Letter 2. 2012 Jan 2 [cited 2015 Mar 8]. Available from: URL: http://www.fdanews.com/articles/142851–2011-in-review-mdufa-510-k-debate-made-list-of-top-news?v=preview.

Cortez C. The mobile health revolution? 47 U.C. Davis L Rev 2014;47:1173–230.

McGowan JJ Cusack CM Bloomrosen M. The future of health IT innovation and informatics: A report from AMIA/s 2010 policy meeting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:460–7.

Cooper D. Notes: Understanding the impact of the FDA guidance for mobile medical applications: Is there an app for that? 32 Quinnipiac L Rev 2013;95:112–3.

Wanderer J Mishra P Ehrenfeld J. Innovation & market consolidation among electronic health record vendors: An acute need for regulation. J Medical Systems 2014;38:8.

Pasquale F Goldstein MM , Regulatory landscape II: Looking forward. Presentation at Exploring Legal Challenges to Fulfilling the Potential of mHealth in a Safe and Responsible Environment, a workshop sponsored by the American Association for the Advancement of Science; 2014 Jun 16–17; Washington.