Abstract

References
1.
Association for Molecular Pathology et al. v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., et al. 133 S. Ct. 2107 (June 13, 2013).
2.American Cancer Society . Cancer facts and figures 2013 [cited 2013 Nov 30]. Available from: URL: http://www.cancer.org/research/cancerfactsstatistics/cancerfactsfigures2013/index
3.National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (US) . Cancer trends progress report—2011/2012 update. Bethesda (MD): NCI, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services (US); 2012 Also available from: URL: http://progressreport.cancer.gov [cited 2013 Nov 30].
4.National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (US) . Fact sheet: BRCA1 and BRCA2: cancer risk and genetic testing [cited 2013 Nov 30]. Available from: URL: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/BRCA
5.
Domchek
SM
Friebel
TM
Singer
CF
Evans
DG
Lynch
HT
Isaacs
C
Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality . JAMA 2010 ; 304 :967 –75 .
6.
Mullin
J
. Ambry hits back at Myriad's “bad faith enforcement” of breast cancer gene patents. Ars Technica 2013 Aug 7 [cited 2013 Nov 30]. Available from: URL: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/08/ambry-hits-back-at-myriads-bad-faith-enforcement-of-breast-cancer-gene-patents
7.
Krench
M
. New Supreme Court decision rules that cDNA is patentable—what it means for research and genetic testing. Scientific American 2013 Jul 9 [cited 2013 Nov 30]. Available from: URL: http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2013/07/09/new-supreme-court-decision-rules-that-cdna-is-patentablewhat-it-means-for-research-and-genetic-testing
8.
Association for Molecular Pathology v. United States Patent and Trademark Office, 669 F. Supp. 2d 365, 385-392 (SDNY 2009).
9.
Association for Molecular Pathology v. United States Patent and Trademark Office, 689 F.3d 1303, 1323 (CA Fed. 2012).
10.
Pollack
A
. After patent ruling, availability of gene tests could broaden. The New York Times 2013 Jun 13 [cited 2013 Nov 30]. Available from: URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/14/business/after-dna-patent-ruling-availability-of-genetic-tests-could-broaden.html?hp&_r=0
11.
University of Utah Research Foundation, et al. v. Ambry Genetics Corp. Case No. 2:13-cv-00640-RJS (D. Utah, filed July 9, 2013).
12.
Jaslow
R
. Supreme Court's gene patent ruling could boost patient care, experts say. CBS News 2013 Jun 13 [cited 2013 Nov 30]. Available from: URL: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-204_162-57589253/supreme-courts-gene-patent-ruling-could-boost-patient-care-experts-say
13.
Khan
A
. Doctors: Supreme Court BRCA gene patent ruling benefits patients. Los Angeles Times 2013 Jun 13 [cited 2013 Nov 30]. Available from: URL: http://www.latimes.com/news/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-supreme-court-gene-patent-brca-celebrate-20130613,0,1238521.story
14.
Cho
M
Illangasekare
S
Weaver
MA
Leonard
DG
Merz
JF
. Effects of patents and licenses on the provision of clinical genetic testing services . J Mol Diagn 2003 ; 5 :3 –8 .
15.
Resnick
B
. Why is Myriad Genetics still filing patent suits for breast-cancer tests? National Journal 2013 Aug 8 [cited 2013 Nov 30]. Available from: URL: http://www.nationaljournal.com/healthcare/why-is-myriad-genetics-still-filing-patent-suits-for-breast-cancer-tests-20130808
16.
Rosenfeld
JA
Mason
CE
. Pervasive sequence patents cover the entire human genome . Genome Med 2013 ; 5 :27 .
