The social determinants of health (SDH) include factors apart from genes and biology that affect population health. Zoning is an urban planning tool that influences neighborhood built environments. We describe the methods and results of a health impact assessment (HIA) of a rezoning effort in Baltimore, Maryland, called TransForm Baltimore. We highlight findings specific to physical activity, violent crime, and obesity.
Methods.
We conducted a multistage HIA of TransForm Baltimore using HIA practice guidelines. Key informant interviews identified focus areas for the quantitative assessment. A literature review and a zoning code analysis evaluated potential impacts on neighborhood factors including physical activity, violent crime, and obesity. We estimated potential impacts in high- and low-poverty neighborhoods. The findings resulted in recommendations to improve the health-promoting potential of TransForm Baltimore.
Results.
Mixed-use and transit-oriented development were key goals of TransForm Baltimore. Health impacts identified by stakeholders included walkability and healthy communities. For Baltimore residents, we estimated that (1) the percentage of people living in districts allowing mixed-use and off-premise alcohol outlets would nearly triple, (2) 18% would live in transit-oriented development zones, and (3) all residents would live in districts with new lighting and landscaping guidelines. Limiting the concentration of off-premise alcohol outlets represented an opportunity to address health promotion.
Conclusions.
Changes to Baltimore's zoning code could improve population health including decreasing violent crime. HIAs are an important platform for applying SDH to public health practice. This HIA specifically linked municipal zoning policy with promoting healthier neighborhoods.
World Health Organization, Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: WHO; 2008.
NorthridgeMESclarEDBiswasP.Sorting out the connections between the built environment and health: A conceptual framework for navigating pathways and planning healthy cities. J Urban Health2003;80:556–68.
5.
SallisJFGlanzK.The role of built environments in physical activity, eating, and obesity in childhood. Future Child2006;16:89–108.
6.
RuttCDannenbergALKochtitzkyC.Using policy and built environment interventions to improve public health. J Public Health Manag Pract2008;14:221–3.
PerrinC.Everything in its place: Social order and land use in America. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1979.
9.
HaarCMKaydenJS, Zoning and the American dream: Promises still to keep. Washington: American Planning Association (Planners Press); 1990.
10.
SchillingJLintonLS, The public health roots of zoning: In search of active living/s legal genealogy. Am J Prev Med2005;28(2 Suppl 2):96–104.
11.
SkoseyPPerskyDChungPde LeonM. PonceRevise, recreate, rezone: A neighborhood guide to zoning. Chicago: Metropolitan Planning Council; 2001.
12.
ElliottDL, A better way to zone: Ten principles to create more livable cities. Washington: Island Press; 2008.
13.
DuerksenC.Saving the world through zoning. Planning2008;74:28–33.
14.
MaantayJ.Zoning, equity, and public health. Am J Public Health2001;91:1033–41.
15.
RansomMMGreinerAKochtitzkyCMajorKS, Pursuing health equity: Zoning codes and public health. J Law Med Ethics2011;39Suppl 1:94–7.
16.
SchillingJ.Creating a regulatory blueprint for healthy community design: A local government guide to reforming zoning and land development codes. Washington: International City/County Management Association; 2005.
17.
BrantinghamPLBrantinghamPJ, Notes on the geometry of crime. In: BrantinghamPJBrantinghamPL, editors. Environmental criminology. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage Publications; 1981. p. 27–54.
18.
McCordESRatcliffeJHGarciaRMTaylorRB, Nonresidential crime attractors and generators elevate perceived neighborhood crime and incivilities. J Res Crime Delinq2007;44:295–320.
19.
TaylorRB, Breaking away from broken windows: Baltimore neighborhoods and the nationwide fight against crime, grime, fear, and decline. New York: Westview Press; 2001.
20.
ScribnerRAMacKinnonDPDwyerJH, Alcohol outlet density and motor vehicle crashes in Los Angeles County cities. J Stud Alcohol1994;55:447–53.
HumeCTimperioASalmonJCarverAGiles-CortiBCrawfordD.Walking and cycling to school: Predictors of increases among children and adolescents. Am J Prev Med2009;36:195–200.
23.
TimperioASalmonJTelfordACrawfordD.Perceptions of local neighbourhood environments and their relationship to childhood overweight and obesity. Int J Obes (Lond)2005;29:170–5.
24.
FormanHKerrJNormanGJSaelensBEDurantNHHarrisSK, Reliability and validity of destination-specific barriers to walking and cycling for youth. Prev Med2008;46:311–6.
25.
AddyCLWilsonDKKirtlandKAAinsworthBESharpePKimseyD.Associations of perceived social and physical environmental supports with physical activity and walking behavior. Am J Public Health2004;94:440–3.
26.
LovasiGSNeckermanKMQuinnJWWeissCCRundleA.Effect of individual or neighborhood disadvantage on the association between neighborhood walkability and body mass index. Am J Public Health2009;99:279–84.
27.
LaVeistTAWallaceJMJr. Health risk and inequitable distribution of liquor stores in African American neighborhoods. Soc Sci Med2000;51:613–7.
World Health Organization. Health impact assessment: Main concepts and suggested approach. Gothenburg consensus paper. Brussels: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 1999.
32.
North American HIA Practice Standards Working Group. Practice standards for health impact assessment (HIA), version 1. Oakland (CA): North American HIA Practice Standards Working Group; 2009.
33.
RichardsSJohnsBGibbonsLHamCGeogheganEAmesA, Baltimore City neighborhood health profiles: Briefing to the Baltimore City Council. Baltimore: Baltimore City Health Department; 2008.
34.
FeldsteinLM, General plans and zoning: A toolkit for building healthy, vibrant communities. Sacramento (CA): California Department of Health Care Services; 2007.
35.
ThorntonRFichtenbergCGreinerAFeingoldBEllenJJenningsJ, Zoning for a healthy Baltimore: A health impact assessment of the TransForm Baltimore comprehensive zoning code rewrite. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Center for Child and Community Health Research; 2010.
36.
North American HIA Practice Standards Working Group. Minimum elements and practice standards for health impact assessment, version 2. Oakland (CA): North American HIA Practice Standards Working Group; 2010.
37.
MindellJHansellAMorrisonDDouglasMJoffeM.What do we need for robust, quantitative health impact assessment?J Public Health2001;23:173–8.
38.
PowerG.Apartheid Baltimore style: The residential segregation ordinances of 1910–1913. Maryland Law Rev1983;42:289–330.
39.
Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Vital Statistics Administration. Maryland vital statistics annual report 2008. Baltimore: Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2008.
40.
Baltimore City Health Department. Fact sheet: Overweight and obesity in Baltimore City, 1997–2007. Baltimore: Baltimore City Health Department; 2008.
41.
ESRI, Inc.ArcGIS®: Version 9.3. Redlands (CA): ESRI, Inc.; 2008.
FrancoMRouxAV DiezGlassTACaballeroBBrancatiFL, Neighborhood characteristics and availability of healthy foods in Baltimore. Am J Prev Med2008;35:561–7.
44.
JargowskyPA, Poverty and place: Ghettos, barrios, and the American city. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1997.
45.
ScharperJ.City farms could flourish under new zoning code: Planners want to make Baltimore healthier, more walkable. The Baltimore Sun2010 Jun 14.
46.
GreinerAGermanDFeingoldBPettewayRGaroonJ.How does zoning impact public health?Baltimore: Rewrite Baltimore; 2010. Also available from: URL: http://www.rewritebaltimore.org/pdf/PUBLIC_HEALTH.pdf [cited 2013 Jan 17].
47.
FrankLDSchmidTLSallisJFChapmanJSaelensBE, Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form—findings from SmarTraq. Am J Prev Med2005;28 (2 Suppl 2):117–25.
48.
FrankLDAndresenMASchmidTL, Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. Am J Prev Med2004;27:87–96.
49.
KerrJFrankLSallisJFChapmanJ.Urban form correlates of pedestrian travel in youth: Differences by gender, race-ethnicity, and household attributes. Transport Res—Part D2007;12:177–82.
50.
LiFHarmerPACardinalBJBosworthMAcockAJohnson-SheltonD, Built environment, adiposity, and physical activity in adults aged 50–75. Am J Prev Med2008;35:38–46.
51.
RodriguezDAEvensonKRRouxAVBrinesSJ, Land use, residential density, and walking: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Am J Prev Med2009;37:397–404.
52.
MobleyLRRootEDFinkelsteinEAKhaxjouOFarrisRPWillJC, Environment, obesity, and cardiovascular disease risk in low-income women. Am J Prev Med2006;30:327–32.
53.
BrownBBYamadaISmithKRZickCDKowaleski-JonesLFanJX, Mixed land use and walkability: Variations in land use measures and relationships with BMI, overweight, and obesity. Health Place2009;15:1130–41.
54.
StuckyTDOttensmannJR, Land use and violent crime. Criminology2009;47:1223–64.
BranasCCElliottMRRichmondTSCulhaneDPWiebeDJ, Alcohol consumption, alcohol outlets, and the risk of being assaulted with a gun. Alcohol Clin Exp Res2009;33:906–15.
57.
CampbellCAHahnRAElderRBrewerRChattopadhyaySFieldingJ, The effectiveness of limiting alcohol outlet density as a means of reducing excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms. Am J Prev Med2009;37:556–69.
58.
ParkerRN, Alcohol and violence: Connections, evidence and possibilities for prevention. J Psychoactive Drugs2004;Suppl 2:157–63.
59.
LivingstonMChikritzhsTRoomR.Changing the density of alcohol outlets to reduce alcohol-related problems. Drug Alcohol Rev2007;26:557–66.
60.
BranasCCElliottMRRichmondTSCulhaneDPWiebeDJ, Alcohol consumption, alcohol outlets, and the risk of being assaulted with a gun. Alcohol Clin Exp Res2009;33:906–15.
