We examined disparities in periodontal disease in U.S. adults according to age, sex, race/ethnicity, country of birth, education, income, and poverty-income ratio within and between the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III, 1988–1994) and NHANES 1999–2004.
Methods.
We assessed disparities and changes therein using prevalence differences and ratios, as well as the Symmetrized Theil Index (STI). While these measures document disparities between pairs of population subgroups, and changes in relative disparities between surveys, the STI is a summary measure of health disparities that also tracks between-group disparities relative to the total population.
Results.
Prevalence differences and ratios for the prevalence of periodontitis, the mean pocket depth (PD), and the mean clinical attachment loss (CAL) suggest that periodontal disease significantly decreased between NHANES III and NHANES 1999–2004 (p<0.01). However, the STI for the prevalence of periodontitis suggests that disparities significantly increased within categories of race/ethnicity, country of birth, and education in NHANES 1999–2004 compared with NHANES III. These findings were corroborated for mean PD and mean CAL (p<0.001): the overall STI significantly increased for mean PD from 4.53% in NHANES III to 11.02% in NHANES 1999–2004 and for mean CAL for teeth with CAL >0 from 31.73% in NHANES III to 43.36% in NHANES 1999–2004.
Conclusions.
Our findings suggest that inequalities in periodontal disease significantly decreased between NHANES III and NHANES 1999–2004 in the total population and across selected characteristics of the population. However, these inequalities increased within groups of the population in NHANES 1999–2004 compared with NHANES III. These findings call attention to the absolute and relative differences not only between population groups across surveys, but also within population groups within and between surveys.
References
1.
NikiasMKFinkRSollecitoW.Oral health status in relation to socioeconomic and ethnic characteristics of urban adults in the U.S.A.Community Dent Oral Epidemiol1977; 5:200–6.
2.
OliverRCBrownLJLoeH.Variations in the prevalence and extent of periodontitis. J Am Dent Assoc1991; 122:43–8.
3.
OliverRCBrownLJLoeH.Periodontal diseases in the United States population. J Periodontol1998; 69:269–78.
4.
ElterJRBeckJDSladeGDOffenbacherS.Etiologic models for incident periodontal attachment loss in older adults. J Clin Periodontol1999; 26:113–23.
5.
WhiteBACaplanDJWeintraubJA. A quarter century of changes in oral health in the United States. J Dent Educ1995; 59:19–57.
6.
CaplanDJWeintraubJA. The oral health burden in the United States: A summary of recent epidemiologic studies. J Dent Educ1993; 57:853–62.
7.
AlbandarJM. Periodontal diseases in North America. Periodontol 20002002; 29:31–69.
8.
BorrellLNBurtBAWarrenRCNeighborsHW. The role of individual and neighborhood social factors on periodontitis: The third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Periodontol2006; 77:444–53.
9.
BorrellLNBurtBANeighborsHWTaylorGW. Social factors and periodontitis in an older population. Am J Public Health2004; 94:748–54.
10.
AlbandarJMBrunelleJAKingmanA.Destructive periodontal disease in adults 30 years of age and older in the United States, 1988–1994. J Periodontol1999; 70:13–29.
11.
AlbandarJMKingmanABrownLJLoeH.Gingival inflammation and subgingival calculus as determinants of disease progression in early-onset periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol1998; 25:231–7.
12.
HymanJJReidBC. Epidemiologic risk factors for periodontal attachment loss among adults in the United States. J Clin Periodontol2003; 30:230–7.
13.
DyeBASelwitzRH. The relationship between selected measures of periodontal status and demographic and behavioural risk factors. J Clin Periodontol2005; 32:798–808.
14.
BorrellLNLynchJNeighborsHBurtBAGillespieBW. Is there homogeneity in periodontal health between African Americans and Mexican Americans?Ethn Dis2002; 12:97–110.
15.
BorrellLNBurtBAGillespieBWLynchJNeighborsH.Race and periodontitis in the United States: Beyond black and white. J Public Health Dent2002; 62:92–101.
16.
BorrellLNBurtBATaylorGW. Prevalence and trends in periodontitis in the USA: The [corrected] NHANES, 1988 to 2000 [published erratum appears in J Dent Res 2006; 85:287]. J Dent Res2005; 84:924–30.
17.
DouglassCWGillingsDSollecitoWGammonM.National trends in the prevalence and severity of the periodontal diseases. J Am Dent Assoc1983; 107:403–12.
18.
LockerDLeakeJL. Risk indicators and risk markers for periodontal disease experience in older adults living independently in Ontario, Canada. J Dent Res1993; 72:9–17.
19.
BorrellLNCrawfordND. Social disparities in periodontitis among United States adults 1999–2004. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol2008; 36:383–91.
20.
KellyJEVan KirkLE. Periodontal disease in adults. United States, 1960–1962. Vital Health Stat 111965 (12).
21.
KellyJEHarveyCR. Basic data on dental examination findings of persons 1–74 years. United States, 1971–1974. Vital Health Stat 111979 (214).
22.
CapiloutoMLDouglassCW. Trends in the prevalence and severity of periodontal diseases in the US: A public health problem?J Public Health Dent1988; 48:245–51.
23.
DruryTFGarciaIAdesanyaM.Socioeconomic disparities in adult oral health in the United States. Ann N Y Acad Sci1999; 896:322–4.
24.
Department of Health and Human Services (US), Office of the Surgeon General. Oral health in America: A report of the Surgeon General. Rockville (MD): HHS, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health; 2000.
25.
DyeBATanSSmithVLewisBGBarkerLKThornton-EvansG, Trends in oral health status: United States, 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. Vital Health Stat 112007 (248).
26.
WagstaffAPaciPvan DoorslaerE.On the measurement of inequalities in health. Soc Sci Med1991; 33:545–57.
27.
MackenbachJPKunstAE. Measuring the magnitude of socioeconomic inequalities in health: An overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe. Soc Sci Med1997; 44:757–71.
28.
PearcyJNKeppelKG. A summary measure of health disparity. Public Health Rep2002; 117:273–80.
29.
RegidorE. Measures of health inequalities: Part 1. J Epidemiol Community Health2004; 58:858–61.
30.
RegidorE. Measures of health inequalities: Part 2. J Epidemiol Community Health2004; 58:900–3.
31.
KeppelKPamukELynchJCarter-PokrasOKimInsunMaysV, Methodological issues in measuring health disparities. Vital Health Stat 22005 (141).
32.
HarperSLynchJ.Methods for measuring cancer disparities: A review using data relevant to Healthy People 2010 cancer-related objectives. NCI Cancer Surveillance Monograph Series, Number 6. NIH Publication No. 05-5777. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute; 2005.
33.
HarperSLynchJ.Measuring health inequalities. In: OakesJMKaufmanJS, editors. Methods in social epidemiology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2006. p. 134–68.
34.
ChengNFHanPZGanskySA. Methods and software for estimating health disparities: The case of children's oral health. Am J Epidemiol2008; 168:906–14.
35.
HarperSLynchJMeersmanSCBreenNDavisWWReichmanME. An overview of methods for monitoring social disparities in cancer with an example using trends in lung cancer incidence by area-socioeconomic position and race-ethnicity, 1992–2004. Am J Epidemiol2008; 167:889–99.
36.
TheilH. Economics and information theory. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): North-Holland Publishing Co.; 1967.
37.
FirebaughG. The new geography of global income inequality. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 2003.
38.
BorrellLNTalihM.A symmetrized Theil index measure of health disparities: An example using dental caries in U.S.children and adolescents. Stat Med2011; 30:277–90.
39.
LevyJIChemerynskiSMTuchmannJL. Incorporating concepts of inequality and inequity into health benefits analysis. Int J Equity Health2006; 5:2.
40.
National Center for Health Statistics (US). Plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–94. Vital Health Stat 11994 (32).
41.
EzzatiTMMasseyJTWaksbergJChuAMaurerKR. Sample design: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Vital Health Stat 21992 (113).
42.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Questionnaires, datasets and related documentation, 1999–2004 [cited 2009 Jul 3]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nhanes_questionnaires.htm
43.
WinnDMJohnsonCLKingmanA.Periodontal disease estimates in NHANES III: Clinical measurement and complex sample design issues. J Public Health Dent1999; 59:73–8.
44.
44 DyeBABarkerLKSelwitzRHLewisBGWuTFryarCD, Overview and quality assurance for the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) oral health component, 1999–2002. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol2007; 35:140–51.
45.
DyeBANowjack-RaymerRBarkerLKNunnJHSteeleJGTanS, Overview and quality assurance for the oral health component of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2003–04. J Public Health Dent2008; 68:218–26.
46.
BeckJDKochGGRozierRGTudorGE. Prevalence and risk indicators for periodontal attachment loss in a population of older community-dwelling blacks and whites. J Periodontol1990; 61:521–8.
47.
MachteiEEChristerssonLAGrossiSGDunfordRZambonJJGencoRJ. Clinical criteria for the definition of “established periodontitis.” J Periodontol 1992; 63:206–14.
48.
Department of Labor (US), Bureau of Labor Statistics. Databases, tables and calculators by subject. Consumer Price Index inflation calculator [cited 2009 Aug 12]. Available from: URL: http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm
49.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), National Center for Health Statistics. NHANES III reference nanual and reports [CD-ROM]. Hyattsville (MD): CDC, NCHS; 1996.
50.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US), National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Questionnaires, datasets and related documentation, 1999–2004. NHANES 1999–2000 addendum to the NHANES III analytic guidelines. Updated August 30, 2002 [cited 2009 Aug 4]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/guidelines1.pdf
51.
SAS Institute, Inc. SAS®: Version 9.2. Cary (NC): SAS Institute, Inc.; 2009.
52.
R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [ISBN 3-900051-07-0]. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2010.
53.
LumleyT. Analysis of complex survey samples. J Stat Software2004; 9:1–19.
