AdlerNEStewartJ, editors. The biology of disadvantage: socioeconomic status and health. New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences; 2010.
3.
Commission on the Social Determinants of Health. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008 Also available from: URL: http://www.who.int/social_determinants/thecommission/finalreport/en/index.html [cited 2011 Oct 3].
4.
The John D. and Katherine T. MacArthur Foundation. MacArthur Research Network on Socioeconomic Status and Health: about the network/network mission [cited 2010 Dec 1]. Available from: URL: http://www.macses.ucsf.edu/about
5.
BunkerJP. The role of medical care in contributing to health improvements within societies. Int J Epidemiol2001; 30:1260–3.
6.
MackenbachJP. The contribution of medical care to mortality decline: McKeown revisited. J Clin Epidemiol1996; 49:1207–13.
7.
McGinnisJMWilliams-RussoPKnickmanJR. The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Aff (Millwood)2002; 21:78–93.
8.
LeePPaxmanD. Reinventing public health. Annu Rev Public Health1997; 18:1–35.
9.
SchroederSA. Shattuck Lecture. We can do better—improving the health of the American people. N Engl J Med2007; 357:1221–8.
10.
BravemanPACubbinCEgerterSWilliamsDRPamukE. Socioeconomic disparities in health in the United States: what the patterns tell us. Am J Public Health2010; 100Suppl 1:S186–96.
11.
MinklerMFuller-ThomsonEGuralnikJM. Gradient of disability across the socioeconomic spectrum in the United States. N Engl J Med2006; 355:695–703.
12.
PuskaPStåhlT. Health in All Policies—the Finnish initiative: background, principles, and current issues. Annu Rev Public Health2010; 31:315–28.
13.
SuhrckeMNugentRAStuklerDRoccoL. Chronic disease: an economic perspective. London: Oxford Health Alliance; 2006.
14.
TeutschSMFieldingJE. Comparative effectiveness—looking under the lamppost. JAMA2011; 305:2225–6.
15.
World Health Organization. Declaration of Alma-Ata. International Conference on Primary Health Care; 1978 Sep 6-12; Alma-Ata, USSR.
16.
OllilaE. Health in All Policies: from rhetoric to action. Scand J Public Health2011; 39Suppl 6:S11–8.
World Health Organization. Ottawa charter for health promotion. First International Conference on Health Promotion; 1986 Nov 21; Ottawa, Ontario. Also available from: URL: http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/ottawa_charter_hp.pdf [cited 2011 Sep 27].
World Health Organization. Adelaide statement on Health in All Policies: moving towards a shared governance for health and well-being. Report from the International Meeting on Health in All Policies; 2010 Apr 13-15; Adelaide, South Australia. Also available from: URL: http://www.who.int/social_determinants/hiap_statement_who_sa_final.pdf [cited 2011 Sep 27].
21.
WilliamsDRMcClellanMBRivlinAM. Beyond the Affordable Care Act: achieving real improvements in Americans' health. Health Aff (Millwood)2010; 29:1481–8.
KickbuschIMcCannWSherbonT. Adelaide revisited: from Healthy Public Policy to Health in All Policies. Health Promot Int2008; 23:1–4.
24.
Secretary's Advisory Committee on National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives for 2020. Healthy people 2020: an opportunity to address societal determinants of health in the U.S. 2010 [cited 2011 Sep 27]. Available from: URL: http://healthypeople.gov/2020/about/advisory/SocietalDeterminantsHealth.pdf
25.
MetcalfeOHigginsC. Healthy public policy—is Health Impact Assessment the cornerstone?Public Health2009; 123:296–301.
World Health Organization. Health equity in all urban policies: a report on the expert consultation on intersectoral action (ISA) in the prevention of noncommunicable conditions. Kobe (Japan): World Health Organization; 2009 Also available from: URL: http://www.who/or/jp/ISA-Report_final_22Feb2010.pdf [cited 2010 Oct 17].
RitsatakisAJarvisaloJ. Opportunities and challenges for including health components in the policy-making process. In: StahlTWismarMOllilaELahtinenELeppoK, editors. Health in All Policies: prospects and potentials. Helsinki (Finland): Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2006. p. 145–68.
32.
European Centre for Health Policy. Health Impact Assessment: main concepts and suggested approach: Gothenburg consensus paper. Brussels: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 1999. Also available from: URL: http://www.euro.who.int/document/PAE/Gothenburgpaper.pdf [cited 2011 Sep 27].
33.
LockK. Health Impact Assessment. BMJ2000; 320:1395–8.
34.
CollinsJKoplanJP. Health Impact Assessment: a step toward Health in All Policies. JAMA2009; 302:315–7.
35.
ColeBLFieldingJE. Health Impact Assessment: a tool to help policy makers understand health beyond health care. Annu Rev Public Health2007; 28:393–412.
36.
DannenbergALBhatiaRColeBLDoraCFieldingJEKraftKGrowing the field of Health Impact Assessment in the United States: an agenda for research and practice. Am J Public Health2006; 96:262–70.
37.
BhatiaRKatzM. Estimation of health benefits from a local living wage ordinance. Am J Public Health2001; 91:1398–402.
38.
San Francisco Department of Public Health, Program on Health Equity and Sustainability. Paid sick days HIA. 2009 [cited 2011 Sep 27]. Available from: URL: http://www.sfphes.org/work_sick_day.htm
39.
SimonPJaroszCJKuoTFieldingJE. Menu labeling as a potential strategy for combating the obesity epidemic: a Health Impact Assessment. Los Angeles: County of Los Angeles Public Health, Division of Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention; 2008.
40.
University of California, Los Angeles. Health Impact Assessment Clearinghouse Learning and Information Center [cited 2010 Oct 20]. Available from: URL: http://www.hiaguide.org
41.
University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health. Health Impact Assessment course [cited 2010 Oct 20]. Available from: URL: http://sites.google.com/site/ucbhia/education
San Francisco Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Section, Program on Health Equity and Sustainability. HIA practitioners summer training course; 2011 Jul 25-28; Oakland, California. Also available from: URL: http://www.sfphes.org/HIA_Training.htm [cited 2010 Oct 20].
FarquharD. Health Impact Assessments: a tool to assess and mitigate the effects of policy decisions on public health. Washington: National Conference of State Legislatures; 2008.
46.
WernhamABhatiaR. Integrating human health into environmental impact assessment: an unrealized opportunity for environmental health and justice. Environ Health Perspect2008; 116:991–1000.
47.
MetcalfeOHigginsC. Health Impact Assessment contributing to Healthy Public Policy. Public Health2009; 123:295.
48.
MannheimerLMGulisGLehtoJOstlinP. Introducing Health Impact Assessment: an analysis of political and administrative intersectoral working methods. Eur J Public Health2007; 17:526–31.
49.
KemmJ. Health Impact Assessment: a tool for Healthy Public Policy. Health Promot Int2001; 16:79–85.
50.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. HR 3590, Title IV, §4001 (2010).
51.
National Prevention Council (US). National Prevention Strategy: America's plan for better health and wellness. Washington: Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General (US); 2011.
52.
Environmental Protection Agency (US). HUD-DOT-EPA partnership for sustainable communities [cited 2010 Oct 17]. Available from: URL: http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/partnership
53.
PetterssonB. Health in All Policies across jurisdictions—a snapshot from Sweden. Public Health Bull SA2010; 7:17–20.
54.
BacigalupeAEsnaolaSMartínUZuazagoitiaJ. Learning lessons from past mistakes: how can Health in All Policies fulfill its promises?J Epidemiol Community Health2010; 64:504–5.
55.
KoivusaloM. The state of Health in All Policies (HiAP) in the European Union: potential and pitfalls. J Epidemiol Community Health2010; 64:500–3.
56.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. Pub. L. No. 91-190, 42 U.S.C. (1969).
57.
Council on Environmental Quality. The National Environmental Policy Act: a study of its effectiveness after twenty-five years. Washington: President's Council on Environmental Quality; 1997.
58.
WernhamA. Inupiat health and proposed Alaskan oil development: results of the first integrated Health Impact Assessment/environmental impact statement for proposed oil development on Alaska's North Slope. EcoHealth2007; 4:500–13.
59.
BhatiaR. Protecting health using an environmental impact assessment: a case study of San Francisco land use decisionmaking. Am J Public Health2007; 97:406–13.
60.
CorburnJ. Toward the healthy city: people, places, and the politics of urban planning. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2009.
61.
Human Impact Partners. Considerations for the selection of appropriate policies, plans, or projects for analysis using Health Impact Assessment. 2009 [cited 2011 Jul 18]. Available from: URL: http://www.humanimpact.org/component/jdownloads/finish/12/20
62.
ChamberlayneRGreenBBarerMLHertzmanCLawrenceWJShepsSB. Creating a population-based linked health database: a new resource for health services research. Can J Public Health1998; 89:270–3.
63.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network [cited 2010 Oct 17]. Available from: URL: http://ephtracking.cdc.gov/showAbout.action
64.
BravemanPAEgerterSAWoolfSHMarksJS. When do we know enough to recommend action on the social determinants of health?Am J Prev Med2011; 40(1 Suppl 1):S58–66.
65.
AndersonLMBrownsonRCFulliloveMTTeutschSMNovickLFFieldingJEvidence-based public health policy and practice: promises and limits. Am J Prev Med2005; 28(5 Suppl):226–30.
66.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). Guide to Community Preventive Services: promoting health through the social environment [cited 2010 Dec 21]. Available from: URL: http://www.thecommunityguide.org/social/index.html