World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990–2008. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
2.
World Health Organization. The world health report 2005—make every mother and child count. Geneva: WHO; 2005.
3.
MaineD.Safe motherhood programs: Options and issues. New York: Center for Population and Family Health; 1991.
4.
World Health Organization. Coverage of maternity care: A listing of available information. 4th ed. Geneva: WHO; 1996.
5.
RosenfieldAMaineD.Maternal mortality—a neglected tragedy. Where is the M in MCH? Lancet1985;2:83–5.
6.
AnandalakshmyPNTalwarPPBucksheeKHingoraniV.Demographic, socio-economic and medical factors affecting maternal mortality—an Indian experience. J Family Welfare1993;39:1–4.
7.
AcharyaS.How effective is antenatal care to promote maternal and neonatal health?Int J Gynecol Obstet1995;50Suppl 2:S35–42.
8.
VillarJBergsjoP.Scientific basis for the content of routine antenatal care. I. Philosophy, recent studies, and power to eliminate or alleviate adverse maternal outcomes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand1997;76:1–14.
9.
LutherNY, Mother's tetanus immunisation is associated not only with lower neonatal mortality but also with lower early-childhood mortality. Natl Fam Health Surv Bull1998;(10):1–4.
10.
KavithaNAudinarayanaN.Utilisation and determinants of selected MCH care services in rural areas of Tamil Nadu. Health Pop Perspect Issues1997;20:112–25.
11.
BloomSSWypijDDas GuptaM.Dimensions of women's autonomy and the influence on maternal health care utilization in a north Indian city. Demography2001;38:67–78.
12.
NuwahaFAmooti-KagunaB.Predictors of home deliveries in Rakai District, Uganda. Afr J Reproduct Health1999;3:79–86.
13.
ThaddeusSMaineD.Too far to walk: Maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med1994;38:1091–110.
14.
GabryschSCampbellOM, Still too far to walk: Literature review of the determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth2009;9:34.
15.
DiPreteTAForristalJD, Multilevel models: Methods and substance. Annu Rev Sociol1994;20:331–57.
16.
DuncanCJonesKMoonG.Context, composition and heterogeneity: Using multilevel models in health research. Soc Sci Med1998;46:97–117.
17.
Diez-RouxAV, Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. Am J Public Health2001;91:1783–9.
18.
SayLRaineR.A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: Examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context. Bull World Health Organ2007;85:812–9.
19.
MagadiMAMadiseNJRodriguesRN, Frequency and timing of antenatal care in Kenya: Explaining the variations between women of different communities. Soc Sci Med2000;51:551–61.
20.
LubbockLAStephensonRB, Utilization of maternal health care services in the department of Matagalpa, Nicaragua. Revista Panam Salud Publica2008;24:75–84.
21.
ObermeyerCMPotterJE, Maternal health care utilization in Jordan. Stud Fam Plann1991;22:177–87.
22.
PebleyARGoldmanNRodriguezG.Prenatal and delivery care and childhood immunization in Guatemala: Do family and community matter? [published erratum appears in Demography1996;33(3):i]. Demography 1996;33:231–47.
23.
MagnaniRJHotchkissDRFlorenceCSShaferLA, The impact of the family planning supply environment on contraceptive intentions and use in Morocco. Stud Fam Plann1999;30:120–32.
24.
StephensonRTsuiAO, Contextual influences on reproductive health service use in Uttar Pradesh, India. Stud Fam Plann2002;33:309–20.
25.
StephensonRTsuiAO, Contextual influences on reproductive wellness in northern India. Am J Public Health2003;93:1820–9.
26.
GriffithsPStephensonR.Understanding users' perspectives of barriers to maternal health care use in Maharashtra, India. J Biosoc Sci2001;33:339–59.
27.
StephensonRBekeATshibanguD.Community and health facility influences on contraceptive method choice in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Int Fam Plann Perspect2008;34:62–70.
28.
KestertonAJClelandJSloggettARonsmansC.Institutional delivery in rural India: The relative importance of accessibility and economic status. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth2010;10:30.
29.
RutenbergNWatkinsSC, The buzz outside the clinics: Conversations and contraception in Nyanza Province, Kenya. Stud Fam Plann1997;28:290–307.
30.
BarnettB.First-time users have diverse needs. Network1999;19:4–7.
31.
StephensonRBaschieriAClementsSHenninkMMadiseN.Contextual influences on the use of health facilities for childbirth in Africa. Am J Public Health2006;96:84–93.
32.
BabalolaSFatusiA.Determinants of use of maternal health services in Nigeria—looking beyond individual and household factors. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth2009;9:43.
33.
StephensonRBekeATshibanguD.Contextual influences on contraceptive use in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Health Place2008;14:841–52.
Institut National de la Statistique Ministere des Finances et de la Planification Economique Kigali, Rwanda. Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey 2005—final reports. Calverton (MD): ORC Macro; 2005.
El-ZanatyFWayA.Egypt Demographic and Health Survey2008. Cairo (Egypt): Ministry of Health, El-Zanaty and Associates, and Macro International; 2009.
39.
National Institute of Population Research and Training, Mitra and Associates, and Macro International. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey2007. Dhaka (Bangladesh) and Calverton (MD): National Institute of Population Research and Training, Mitra and Associates, and Macro International; 2009.
40.
United Nations Development Programme. The millennium development goals: Eight goals for 2015. New York: UNDP; 2011. Also available from: URL: http://www.beta.undp.org/undp/en/home/mdgoverview.html [cited 2011 Aug 17].
CampbellOGipsonRIssaAHMattaNEl DeebBEl MohandesA, National maternal mortality ratio in Egypt halved between 1992–93 and 2000. Bull World Health Organ2005;83:462–71.
43.
HabibovNNFanL.Modelling prenatal health care utilization in Tajikistan using a two-stage approach: Implications for policy and research. Health Policy Plan2008;23:443–51.
44.
BhatiaJCClelandJ.Determinants of maternal care in a region of South India. Health Transition Rev1995;5:127–42.
45.
SimkhadaBTeijlingenERPorterMSimkhadaP.Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: Systematic review of the literature. J Adv Nurs2008;61:244–60.
46.
FilmerDPritchettL.The effect of household wealth on educational attainment: Evidence from 35 countries. Popul Dev Rev1999;25:85–120.
47.
FilmerDPritchettLH, Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography2001;38:115–32.
48.
Miles-DoanRBrewsterKL, The impact of type of employment on women's use of prenatal-care services and family planning in urban Cebu, the Philippines. Stud Fam Plann1998;29:69–78.
49.
EstrinDJ, Reproductive behavior is linked to work autonomy, not to employment itself. Int Fam Plann Perspect1999;25:50–1.
50.
GuoGZhaoH.Multilevel modeling for binary data. Annu Rev Sociol2000;26:441–62.
51.
PickettKEPearlM.Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: A critical review. J Epidemiol Community Health2001;55:111–22.