Linking electronic health record (EHR) systems with community information systems (CIS) holds great promise for addressing inequities in social determinants of health (SDH). While EHRs are rich in location-specific data that allow us to uncover geographic inequities in health outcomes, CIS are rich in data that allow us to describe community-level characteristics relating to health. When meaningfully integrated, these data systems enable clinicians, researchers, and public health professionals to actively address the social etiologies of health disparities.
This article describes a process for exploring SDH by geocoding and integrating EHR data with a comprehensive CIS covering a large metropolitan area. Because the systems were initially designed for different purposes and had different teams of experts involved in their development, integrating them presents challenges that require multidisciplinary expertise in informatics, geography, public health, and medicine. We identify these challenges and the means of addressing them and discuss the significance of the project as a model for similar projects.
References
1.
TierneyWMMillerMEOverhageJMMcDonaldCJ, Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations. Effects on resource utilization. JAMA1993;269:379–83.
2.
TierneyWMOverhageJMTakesueBYHarrisLEMurrayMDVargoDL, Computerizing guidelines to improve care and patient outcomes: The example of heart failure. J Am Med Inform Assoc1995;2:316–22.
3.
HoganVK, Addressing perinatal health disparities: Another place for a paradigm shift. N C Med J2004;65:159–63.
4.
BasaraHGYuanM.Community health assessment using self-organizing maps and geographic information systems. Int J Health Geogr2008;7:67.
5.
RouxAV. DiezNeighborhoods and health: Where are we and where do we go from here?Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique2007;55:13–21.
6.
MobleyLRKuoTMAndrewsL.How sensitive are multilevel regression findings to defined area of context?: A case study of mammography use in California. Med Care Res Rev2008;65:315–37.
7.
HenryKANiuXBoscoeFP, Geographic disparities in colorectal cancer survival. Int J Health Geogr2009;8:48.
8.
RouxAV DiezMairC.Neighborhoods and health. Ann N Y Acad Sci2010;1186:125–45.
9.
JohnsonPJCallKTBlewettLA, The importance of geographic data aggregation in assessing disparities in American Indian prenatal care. Am J Public Health2010;100:122–8.
10.
RouxAV. DiezInvestigating neighborhood and area effects on health. Am J Public Health2001;91:1783–9.
11.
WinklebyMAJatulisDEFrankEFortmannSP, Socioeconomic status and health: How education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Am J Public Health1992;82:816–20.
12.
BesculidesMHeffernanRMotashariFWeissD.Evaluation of school absenteeism data for early outbreak detection, New York City. BMC Public Health2005;5:105.
13.
MonteiroEFLaceyCJMerrickD.The interrelation of demographic and geospatial risk factors between four common sexually transmitted diseases. Sex Transm Infect2005;81:41–6.
14.
ColeRLeslieEDonalMCerinEOwenN.Residential proximity to school and the active travel choices of parents. Health Promot J Austr2007;18:127–34.
15.
VaidyanathanAStaleyFShireJMuthukumarSKennedyCMeyerPA, Screening for lead poisoning: A geospatial approach to determine testing of children in at-risk neighborhoods. J Pediatr2009;154:409–14.
16.
MobleyLRKuoTMDriscollDClaytonLAnselinL.Heterogeneity in mammography use across the nation: Separating evidence of disparities from the disproportionate effects of geography. Int J Health Geogr2008;7:32.
17.
StarsinicDE, Projections of the population of voting age for states: November 1984. Curr Popul Rep Popul Charact1984;(948):1–10.
18.
HowellEMPettitKLOrmondBAKingsleyGT, Using the National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership to improve public health. J Public Health Manag Pract2003;9:235–42.
19.
OverhageJMGrannisSMcDonaldCJ, A comparison of the completeness and timeliness of automated electronic laboratory reporting and spontaneous reporting of notifiable conditions. Am J Public Health2008;98:344–50.
20.
GrannisSJBiondichPGMamlinBWWilsonGJonesLOverhageJM, How disease surveillance systems can serve as practical building blocks for a health information infrastructure: The Indiana experience. AMIA Annu Symp Proc2005:286–90.
21.
MahonBERosenmanMBKleimanMB, Maternal and infant use of erythromycin and other macrolide antibiotics as risk factors for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. J Pediatr2001;139:380–4.
22.
OverhageJMDexterPRPerkinsSMCordellWHMcGoffJMcGrathR.A randomized, controlled trial of clinical information shared from another institution. Ann Emerg Med2002;39:14–23.
23.
BiondichPGGrannisSJ, The Indiana network for patient care: An integrated clinical information system informed by over thirty years of experience. J Public Health Manag Pract2004;Suppl:S81–6.
24.
LiuGCCunninghamCDownsSMMarreroDGFeinbergN.A spatial analysis of obesogenic environments for children. Proc AMIA Symp2002:459–63.
25.
HowellEMPettitKLKingsleyGT, Trends in maternal and infant health in poor urban neighborhoods: Good news from the 1990s, but challenges remain. Public Health Rep2005;120:409–17.
26.
LiuG.Obesity and environment in Indianapolis: An analysis of neighborhood indicators. A SAVI report. Indianapolis: The Polis Center at Indiana Univeristy-Purdue University Indianapolis; 2005.
27.
YamadaIComerKF, Exploratory modeling of teenage pregnancy prevalence. Presented at the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association of Geographers; 2006 Mar 5–10; Chicago.
28.
Mushi-BruntCMorroneAAngermeierLRuschhauptDPeeblesJSothmannM.Health knowledge assessment: Improving health literacy among adolescents. Presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the Society for Public Health Education; 2007 Oct 31–Nov 3; Alexandria, Virginia.
29.
SandyRLiuGOttensmanJTchernisRWilsonJFordOT, Studying the child obesity epidemic with natural experiments. In: GrossmanMMocanNC, editors. Economic aspects of obesity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2011. p. 181–221.
30.
HayesRM, Informing our nation: Improving how to understand and assess the USA's position and progress. Libr Info Sci Res2006;28:154–7.
31.
DePSinghAEWongTYacoubWJollyAM, Sexual network analysis of a gonorrhoea outbreak. Sex Transm Infect2004;80:280–5.
32.
AdimoraAASchoenbachVJ, Social context, sexual networks, and racial disparities in rates of sexually transmitted infections. J Infect Dis2005;191Suppl 1: S115–22.
33.
LawDCSerreMLChristakosGLeonePAMillerWC, Spatial analysis and mapping of sexually transmitted diseases to optimise intervention and prevention strategies. Sex Transm Infect2004;80:294–9.
34.
JenningsJMCurrieroFCCelentanoDEllenJM, Geographic identification of high gonorrhea transmission areas in Baltimore, Maryland. Am J Epidemiol2005;161:73–80.
35.
RothenbergRB, The geography of gonorrhea. Empirical demonstration of core group transmission. Am J Epidemiol1983;117:688–94.
36.
PotteratJJRothenbergRBWoodhouseDEMuthJBPrattsCIFogleJS2nd. Gonorrhea as a social disease. Sex Transm Dis1985;12:25–32.
37.
RiceRJRobertsPLHandsfieldHHHolmesKK, Sociodemographic distribution of gonorrhea incidence: Implications for prevention and behavioral research. Am J Public Health1991;81:1252–8.
38.
BeckerKMGlassGEBrathwaiteWZenilmanJM, Geographic epidemiology of gonorrhea in Baltimore, Maryland, using a geographic information system. Am J Epidemiol1998;147:709–16.
39.
BlanchardJFMosesSGreenawayCOrrPHammondGWBrunhamRC, The evolving epidemiology of chlamydial and gonococcal infections in response to control programs in Winnipeg, Canada. Am J Public Health1998;88:1496–502.
40.
AralSOPadianNSHolmesKK, Advances in multilevel approaches to understanding the epidemiology and prevention of sexually transmitted infections and HIV: An overview. J Infect Dis2005;191Suppl 1:S1–6.
41.
KeraniRPHandcockMSHandsfieldHHHolmesKK, Comparative geographic concentrations of four sexually transmitted infections. Am J Public Health2005;95:324–30.
42.
BushKRHendersonEADunnJReadRRSinghA.Mapping the core: Chlamydia and gonorrhea infections in Calgary, Alberta. Sex Transm Dis2008;35:291–7.
43.
BuffardiALThomasKKHolmesKKManhartLE, Moving upstream: Ecosocial and psychosocial correlates of sexually transmitted infections among young adults in the United States. Am J Public Health2008;98:1128–36.
44.
BickellNAVermundSHHolmesMSafyerSBurkRD, Human papillomavirus, gonorrhea, syphilis, and cervical dysplasia in jailed women. Am J Public Health1991;81:1318–20.
45.
HolmesMDSafyerSMBicknellNAVermundSHHanffPAPhillipsRS, Chlamydial cervical infection in jailed women. Am J Public Health1993;83:551–5.
46.
PuisisMLevineWCMertzKJ, Overview of sexually transmitted diseases in correctional facilities. In: PuisisMAnnoBJCohenRLHeymanBKingLNMayJP, editors. Clinical practice in correctional medicine. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998. p. 129–35.
47.
HammettTMHarmonMPRhodesW.The burden of infectious disease among inmates of and releases from U.S. correctional facilities, 1997. Am J Public Health2002;92:1789–94.
48.
National Commission on Correctional Health Care. The health status of soon-to-be-released inmates: A report to Congress. Chicago: National Commission on Correctional Health Care; 2002.
49.
OhMKCloudGAWallaceLSReynoldsJSturdevantMFeinsteinRA, Sexual behavior and sexually transmitted diseases among male adolescents in detention. Sex Transm Dis1994;21:127–32.
50.
MorrisREHarrisonEA, Health risk behavioral survey from 39 juvenile correctional facilities in the United States. J Adolesc Health1995;17:334–44.
51.
WidomRHammettTM, HIV/AIDS and STDs in juvenile facilities. NIJ Res Brief1996;4:1–11.
52.
NesmithJDKlermanLVOhMKFeinsteinRA, Procreative experiences and orientations toward paternity held by incarcerated adolescent males. J Adolesc Health1997;20:198–203.
53.
PackRPDiclementeRJHookEW3rdOhMK, High prevalence of asymptomatic STDs in incarcerated minority male youth: A case for screening. Sex Transm Dis2000;27:175–7.
54.
KahnRHMosureDJBlankSKentCKChowJMBoudovMR, Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae prevalence and coinfection in adolescents entering selected U.S. juvenile detention centers, 1997–2002. Sex Transm Dis2005;32:255–9.
55.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). STD surveillance, 2006. Special focus profiles: Persons entering corrections facilities [cited 2011 May 4]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats06/corrections.htm.
56.
ThomasJCSampsonLA, High rates of incarceration as a social force associated with community rates of sexually transmitted infection. J Infect Dis2005;191Suppl 1:S55–60.
57.
ThomasJCLevandowskiBAIslerMRTorroneEWilsonG.Incarceration and sexually transmitted infections: A neighborhood perspective. J Urban Health2008;85:90–9.
58.
BernsteinKTChowJMRuizJSchacterJHorowitzEBunnellR, Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections among men and women entering California prisons. Am J Public Health2006;96:1862–6.
59.
KwanMP, From place-based to people-based exposure measures. Soc Sci Med2009;69:1311–3.
60.
WieheSECarrollAELiuGCHaberkornKLHochSCWilsonJS, Using GPS-enabled cell phones to track the travel patterns of adolescents. Int J Health Geogr2008;7:22.
61.
eHealth Initiative. Results of 2009 Survey of Health Information Exchange: State of the field. Washington: eHealth Initiative; 2009.
62.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111–5, 123 Stat. 115, H.R. 1 (Feb. 17, 2009).
63.
HalamkaJOverhageJMRicciardiLRishelWShirkyCDiamondC.Exchanging health information: Local distribution, national coordination. Health Aff (Millwood)2005;24:1170–9.
64.
RishelWRiehlVBlantonC.Summary of the NHIN prototype architecture contracts. Washington: Department of Health and Human Services (US); 2007.
65.
DobbsDTrebatoskiMRevereD.The Northwest Public Health Information Exchange's accomplishments in connecting a health information exchange with public health. Online J Public Health Inform2010;2(2).
66.
GrannisSJStevensKMerriwetherR.Leveraging health information exchange to support public health situational awareness: The Indiana experience. Online J Public Health Inform2010;2(2).
67.
BodenhamerDJColbertJTComerK FredericksonKandrisSM, Developing and sustaining a community information system for central Indiana: SAVI as a case study. In: SirgyMJPhillipsRRahtzD, editors. Community quality-of-life indicators: Best cases V. New York: Springer; 2011. Volume 3, p. 21–46.
68.
HarrisonTMZappenJPAdaliS.Building community information systems: The Connected Kids case. Computer2005;38:62–9.
