The escalating problem of multiple chronic conditions (MCC) among Americans is now a major public health and medical challenge, associated with suboptimal health outcomes and rising health-care expenses. Despite this problem's growth, the delivery of health services has continued to employ outmoded “siloed” approaches that focus on individual chronic diseases. We describe an action-oriented framework—developed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services with additional input provided by stakeholder organizations—that outlines national strategies for maximizing care coordination and for improving health and quality of life for individuals with MCC. We note how the framework's potential can be optimized through some of the provisions of the new Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, and through public-private partnerships.
AndersonGHorvathJ. The growing burden of chronic disease in America. Public Health Rep2004;119:263–70.
7.
PaezKAZhaoLHwangW. Rising out-of-pocket spending for chronic conditions: a ten-year trend [published erratum appears in Health Aff (Millwood)2009;28:10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.15]. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:15–25.
8.
LeeTAShieldsAEVogeliCGibsonTBWoong-SohnMMarderWDMortality rate in veterans with multiple chronic conditions. J Gen Intern Med2007;22Suppl 3:403–7.
9.
VogeliCShieldsAELeeTAGibsonTBMarderWDWeissKBMultiple chronic conditions: prevalence, health consequences, and implications for quality, care management, and costs. J Gen Intern Med2007;22Suppl 3:391–5.
10.
WolffJLStarfieldBAndersonG. Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med2002;162:2269–76.
11.
MoussaviSChatterjiSVerdesETandonAPatelVUstunB. Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the World Health Surveys. Lancet2007;370:851–8.
12.
ThorpeKEOgdenLLGalactionovaK. Chronic conditions account for rise in Medicare spending from 1987 to 2006. Health Aff (Millwood)2010;29:718–24.
13.
Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington: National Academies Press; 2001.
14.
RedelmeierDATanSHBoothGL. The treatment of unrelated disorders in patients with chronic medical diseases. N EngI J Med1998;338:1516–20.
15.
BodenheimerTLorigKHolmanHGrumbachK. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA2002;288:2469–75.
16.
WagnerEH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness?Eff Clin Pract1998;1:2–4.
17.
BarrVJRobinsonSMarin-LinkBUnderhillLDottsARavens-daleDThe expanded Chronic Care Model: an integration of concepts and strategies from population health promotion and the Chronic Care Model. Hosp Q2003;7:73–82.
LorigKRSobelDSStewartALBrownBWJrBanduraARitterPEvidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care1999;37:5–14.
20.
LorigKRSobelDSRitterPLLaurentDHobbsM. Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Eff Clin Pract2001;4:256–62.
GeymanJP. Disease management: panacea, another false hope, or something in between. Ann Fam Med2007;5:257–60.
25.
PeikesDChenASchoreJBrownR. Effects of care coordination on hospitalization, quality of care, and health care expenditures among Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA2009;301:603–18.
26.
RosenthalTC. The medical home: growing evidence to support a new approach to primary care. J Am Board Fam Med2008;21:427–40.
27.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US). Screening works: update from the field. SAMHSA News2008;16(2). Also available from: URL: http://www.samhsa.gov/samhsa_news/volumexvi_2/article2.htm [cited 2011 Mar 22].
28.
AlakesonVFrankRGKatzRE. Specialty care medical homes for people with severe, persistent mental disorders. Health Aff (Millwood)2010;29:867–73.
29.
FriedmanBJiangHJElixhauserA. Costly hospital readmissions and complex chronic illness. Inquiry2008–2009;45:408–21.
30.
GreenhalghT. Chronic illness: beyond the expert patient. BMJ2009;338:629–31.
31.
LorigKRHurwiczMSoelDHobbsMRitterPL. A national dissemination of an evidence-based self-management program: a process evaluation study. Patient Educ Counseling2004;59:69–79.
32.
LorigKRRitterPLLaurentDDPlantK. Internet-based chronic disease self-management: a randomized trial. Med Care2006;44:946–71.
33.
TinettiMEBogardusSTJrAgostiniJV. Potential pitfalls of disease-specific guidelines for patients with multiple conditions. N Engl J Med2004;351:2870–4.
34.
DarerJDHwangWPhamHHBassEBAndersonG. More training needed in chronic care: a survey of US physicians. Acad Med2004;79:541–8.
35.
BoydCMDarerJBoultCFriedLPBoultLWuAW. Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA2005;294:716–24.
36.
NorrisSLHighKGillTMHennessySKutnerJSReubenDBHealth care for older Americans with multiple chronic conditions: a research agenda. J Am Geriatr Soc2008;56:149–59.
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to Congress: improving incentives in the Medicare program. Washington: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission; June 2009. Also available from: URL: http://www.medpac.gov/documents/jun09_entirereport.pdf [cited 2011 Mar 22].
44.
FisherESShortellSM. Accountable care organizations: accountable for what, to whom, and how. JAMA2010;304:1715–6.
