In 2005, the New York City (NYC) Department of Health and Mental Hygiene implemented a standardized human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence surveillance protocol based on the serologic testing algorithm for recent HIV seroconversion deployed nationwide by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). We evaluated four key attributes of NYC's HIV incidence surveillance system—simplicity, data quality, timeliness, and acceptability—using CDC's guidelines for surveillance system evaluation. The evaluation revealed that the system could potentially provide HIV incidence estimates stratified by borough and major demographic groups at about nine months after the period of interest. The system strengths include its relative simplicity and integration with routine HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome surveillance. Weaknesses include lack of completeness of testing history information, a critical component of incidence estimation. Continued improvements in data completeness and timeliness will improve the currently available information to inform personnel who develop HIV-prevention programs and policy initiatives in NYC and nationally.
References
1.
HendriksJCSattenGAvan AmeijdenEJvan DrutenHACoutinhoRAvan GriensvenGJ. The incubation period to AIDS in injecting drug users estimated from prevalent cohort data, accounting for death prior to an AIDS diagnosis. AIDS1998;12:1537–44.
2.
MorganDMaheCMayanjaBOkongoJMLubegaRWhitworthJA. HIV-1 infection in rural Africa: is there a difference in median time to AIDS and survival compared with that in industrialized countries?AIDS2002;16:597–603.
3.
McDougalJSParekhBSPetersonMLBransonBMDobbsTAckersM. Comparison of HIV type 1 incidence observed during longitudinal follow-up with incidence estimated by cross-sectional analysis using the BED capture enzyme immunoassay. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses2006;22:945–52.
4.
JanssenRSSattenGAStramerSLRawalBDO'BrienTRWeiblenBJ. New testing strategy to detect early HIV-1 infection for use in incidence estimates and for clinical and prevention purposes [published erratum appears in JAMA 1999;281:1893]. JAMA1998;280:42–8.
5.
ParekhBSKennedyMSDobbsTPauCPByersRGreenT. Quantitative detection of increasing HIV type 1 antibodies after seroconversion: a simple assay for detecting recent HIV infection and estimating incidence. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses2002;18:295–307.
6.
McDougalJSPilcherCDParekhBSBershy-DametGBransonBMMarshK. Surveillance for HIV-1 incidence using tests for recent infection in resource-constrained countries. AIDS2005;19Suppl 2:S25–30.
7.
Des JarlaisDCPerlisTArastehKTorianLVBeatriceSMillikenJ. HIV incidence among injection drug users in New York City, 1990 to 2002: use of serologic test algorithm to assess expansion of HIV prevention services. Am J Public Health2005;95:1439–44.
8.
AlvesKShaferKPCaseiroMRutherfordGFalcaoMESucupiraMC. Risk factors for incident HIV infection among anonymous HIV testing site clients in Santos, Brazil: 1996–1999. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr2003;32:551–9.
9.
de Freitas OliveiraCAUedaMYamashiroRRodriguesRSheppardHWde Macedo BrigidoLF. Rate and incidence estimates of recent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infections among pregnant women in Sao Paulo, Brazil, from 1991 to 2002. J Clin Microbiol2005;43:1439–42.
10.
FisherMPaoDMurphyGDeanGMcElboroughDHomerG. Serological testing algorithm shows rising HIV incidence in a UK cohort of men who have sex with men: 10 years application. AIDS2007;21:2309–14.
11.
GouwsEWilliamsBGSheppardHWEngeBKarimSA. High incidence of HIV-1 in South Africa using a standardized algorithm for recent HIV seroconversion. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr2002;29:531–5.
12.
GuptaPKingsleyLSheppardHWHarrisonLHChatterjeeRGhoshA. High incidence and prevalence of HIV-1 infection in high risk population in Calcutta, India. Int J STD AIDS2003;14:463–8.
13.
HallHISongRRhodesPPrejeanJAnQLeeLM. Estimation of HIV incidence in the United States. JAMA2008;300:520–9.
14.
MurphyGCharlettAJordanLFOsnerNGillONParryJV. HIV incidence appears constant in men who have sex with men despite widespread use of effective antiretroviral therapy. AIDS2004;18:265–72.
15.
MurphyGParryJVGuptaSBGrahamCJordanLFNicollAN. Test of HIV incidence shows continuing HIV transmission in homosexual/bisexual men in England and Wales. Commun Dis Public Health2001;4:33–7.
16.
SchwarczSWeinstockHLouieBKelloggTDouglasJLalotaM. Characteristics of persons with recently acquired HIV infection: application of the serologic testing algorithm for recent HIV seroconversion in 10 US cities. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr2007;44:112–5.
17.
SchwarczSKKelloggTAMcFarlandWLouieBKlausnerJWithumDG. Characterization of sexually transmitted disease clinic patients with recent human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Infect Dis2002;186:1019–22.
18.
TaylorMMHawkinsKGonzalezABuchaczKAynalemGSmithLV. Use of the serologic testing algorithm for recent HIV seroconversion (STARHS) to identify recently acquired HIV infections in men with early syphilis in Los Angeles County. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr2005;38:505–8.
19.
TorianLForgioneLEaveyJKentSBennaniY. HIV incidence in New York City in 2006. Poster presented at the 16th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 2009 Feb 8–11; Montreal.
20.
GermanRRLeeLLHoranJMMilsteinRLPertowskiCAWallerMN. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. MMWR Recomm Rep2001;50(RR-13):1–35.
21.
KaronJMSongRBrookmeyerRKaplanEHHallHI. Estimating HIV incidence in the United States from HIV/AIDS surveillance data and biomarker HIV test results. Stat Med2008;27:4617–33.
SAS Institute, Inc.SAS®: Version 9.1 for Windows. Cary (NC): SAS Institute, Inc.; 2003.
24.
AzaroffLSLevensteinCWegmanDH. Occupational injury and illness surveillance: conceptual filters explain underreporting. Am J Public Health2002;92:1421–9.
25.
BrissetteIGelbergKHGreyAJ. The effect of message type on physician compliance with disease reporting requirements. Public Health Rep2006;121:703–9.
26.
KonowitzPMPetrossianGARoseDN. The underreporting of disease and physicians' knowledge of reporting requirements. Public Health Rep1984;99:31–5.
27.
MeekJIRobertsCLSmithEVJrCartterML. Underreporting of Lyme disease by Connecticut physicians, 1992. J Public Health Manag Pract1996;2:61–5.
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Health department releases estimate of yearly HIV infections [press release] 2008 Aug 27 [cited 2010 Aug 13]. Available from: URL: http://www.nyc.gov/html/doh/html/pr2008/pr057-08.shtml
30.
PilcherCDFiscusSANguyenTQFoustEWolfLWilliamsD. Detection of acute infections during HIV testing in North Carolina. N Engl J Med2005;352:1873–83.
31.
Acute HIV infection—New York City, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2009;58(46):1296–9.
