During the 1918–1919 influenza pandemic in the United States, most cities responded by implementing community mitigation strategies, such as school closure. However, three cities—New York City, Chicago, and New Haven, Connecticut—diverged from the dominant pattern by keeping their public schools open while the pandemic raged. This article situates the experiences of these three cities in the broader context of the Progressive era, when officials and experts put great faith in expanding public programs in health and education. It adds an important dimension to the historical understanding of the 1918–1919 influenza pandemic and offers lessons for public health practitioners and policymakers today who might face difficult decisions about how to respond to the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic.
References
1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). CDC guidance for state and local public health officials and school administrators for school (K-12) responses to influenza during the 2009–2010 school year. 2009 Aug 7 [cited 2009 Aug 25]. Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/schools/schoolguidance.htm
RossFA. School attendance in 1920: An analysis of the school attendance in the United States and in the several states, with a discussion of the factors involved. Washington: Government Printing Office; 1924.
5.
GoldinC. Chapter 8c: Education. In: CarterSGartnerSHainesMOlmsteadASutchRWrightG, editors. Historical statistics of the United States, millennial edition, vol. 2, work and welfare. Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 2–404.
6.
CreminLA. The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American education, 1876–1957. New York: Vintage Books; 1961.
7.
TyackDB. The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1974.
8.
NasawD. Schooled to order: A social history of public schooling in the United States. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press; 1979.
9.
DuffyJ. School buildings and the health of American school children in the nineteenth century. In: RosenbergCE, editor. Healing and history: Essays for George Rosen. New York: Science History Publications; 1979. p. 161–78.
10.
MarkelHOskiFA. The H.L. Mencken baby book: Comprising the contents of H.L. Mencken's what you ought to know about your baby with commentaries. Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus; 1990.
11.
CornellWS. Health and medical inspection of school children. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company; 1913.
12.
GulickLHAyresLP. Medical inspection of schools. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1913.
13.
MarkelH. For the welfare of children. The origins of the relationship between U.S. public health workers and pediatricians. Am J Public Health2000;90:893–9.
14.
SullivanJTMurphyTJCroninMJ. Medical inspection of the schools from the standpoint of the medical inspector. Boston Med Surg J1908;159:815–20.
15.
CouesWP. The medical inspection of schools in Boston: The present limitations and future possibilities. Boston Med Surg J1909;160:746–8.
16.
TermanLM. The hygiene of the school child. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1914.
17.
GulickLHAyersLP. Medical examination of schools and scholars in the United States of America. In: KelynackTN, editor, Medical examination of schools and scholars. London: PS King; 1910. p. 341–58.
18.
New York Bureau of Public Health Education. School health news. New York: Department of Health; 1918.
19.
DotyAH. Prevention of infectious diseases. New York: D. Appleton and Company; 1911.
20.
DuffyJ. A history of public health in New York City, vol. 2: 1866–1966. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1974.
21.
RogersLL. Some phases of school nursing. Am J Nurs1908;8:966–74.
22.
YoungJE. Hygiene of the school age. In: AbtIA, editor. Pediatrics, vol. 1. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1923. p. 866–1131.
23.
HoltLE. Diseases of infancy and children. 3rd ed.New York: D. Appleton and Co.; 1907.
24.
Controlling Spanish influenza. National School Service1918;1:1–3.
25.
Board of Health (New York). Sanitary Code of the Board of Health of the Department of Health of the City of New York. New York: C.S. Nathan; 1920.
26.
MarkelHLipmanHBNavarroJASloanAJMichalsenJRSternAM. Nonpharmaceutical interventions implemented by U.S. cities during the 1918–1919 influenza pandemic. JAMA2007;298:644–54.
27.
Churches of city asked to curtail rites. New York American1918 Oct 6:A7.
28.
PorterEH. The new vital statistics law of New York State. Am J Public Health1914;4:125–9.
29.
Epidemic lessons against next time. The New York Times1918 Nov 17:42.
30.
Copeland satisfied by influenza tour. The New York Times1918 Oct 30:10.
31.
RobertsonJD. Report and handbook of the Department of Health of the City of Chicago for the years 1911 to 1918 inclusive. Chicago: City of Chicago; 1919.
32.
Influenza cases here estimated 40,000 to 60,000. Chicago Tribune1918 Oct 16:A1.
33.
Lack substitutes in city schools. New Haven Journal-Courier1918 Oct 28:6.
34.
Influenza cases show slight decline. New Haven Journal-Courier1918 Oct 29:16.
35.
Influenza cases now on decrease. New Haven Journal-Courier1918 Oct 31:13.
36.
JacobsonJ. School nurses nationwide respond to influenza A (H1N1) outbreaks. Am J Nurs2009;109:19.
37.
WolfeLCSelekmanJ. School nurses: What it was and what it is. Pediatr Nurs2002;28:403–7.
38.
HernandezDJCharneyE, editors. From generation to generation: The health and well-being of children in immigrant families. Washington: National Academies Press; 1998.
