Public Health Advocacy in the Courts: Opportunities for Public Health Professionals

Gostin LO . Public health law: power, duty, restraint. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press; 2001.

Gostin LO . Jacobson v. Massachusetts at 100 years: police power and civil liberties in tension. Am J Public Health 2005;95:576–81.

Chrysler Corp. v. Department of Transportation. 472 F.2d 659 (6th Cir. 1972).

Motor Vehicle Manufacturer's Association of the U.S., Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. 463 U.S. 29 (1983).

Vernick JS Mair JS Teret SP Sapsin JW . Role of litigation in preventing product-related injuries. Epidemiol Rev 2003;25:90–8.

Teret SP Jacobs M . Prevention and torts: the role of litigation in injury control. Law Med Health Care 1989;17:17–22.

Vernick JS Sapsin JW Teret SP Mair JS . How litigation can promote product safety. J Law Med Ethics 2004;32:551–5.

Teret SP . Litigating for the public's health. Am J Public Health 1986;76:1027–9.

Jacobson PD Soliman S . Litigation as public health policy: theory or reality? J Law Med Ethics 2002;30:224–38.

Schroeder SA . Tobacco control in the wake of the 1998 master settlement agreement. N Engl J Med 2004;350:293–301.

Vernick JS Rutkow L Salmon D . Availability of litigation as a tool for firearm injury prevention: comparing guns, vaccines, and motor vehicles. Am J Public Health 2007;97:1991–7.

Mishra R . Rhode Island wins lead paint suit. The Boston Globe. 2006 Feb 23:Sect.B:2.

Engle v. Liggett Group Inc., 945 So. 2d. 1246 (Fla. 2006).

Winick BJ . Therapeutic jurisprudence and problem solving courts. Fordham Urban Law J 2003;30:1055–90.

Platt AM . The child savers: the invention of delinquency. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago; 1977.

Hora PF Schma WG Rosenthal JTA . Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug treatment court movement: revolutionizing the criminal justice system's response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Rev 1999;74:439–537.

American University School of Public Affairs. BJA Drug Court Clearinghouse Project: summary of drug court activity by state and county. Washington: American University School of Public Affairs; 2009. Also available from: URL: http://spa.american.edu/justice/documents/2150.pdf [cited 2009 Mar 17].

Belenko S . Research on drug courts: a critical review, 2001 update. New York: Columbia University, National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse; 2001.

Marlowe DB Festinger DS Foltz C Lee PA Patapis NS . Perceived deterrence and outcomes in drug court. Behav Sci Law 2005;23:183–98.

Eibner C Morral AR Pacula RL MacDonald J . Is the drug court model exportable? The cost-effectiveness of a driving-under-the-influence court. J Subst Abuse Treat 2006;31:75–85.

Tsai B . The trend toward specialized domestic violence courts: improvements on an effective innovation. Fordham Law Rev 2000; 68:1285–327.

National Drug Court Institute. DWI courts and DWI/drug courts: reducing recidivism, saving lives [cited 2009 Mar 17], Available from: URL: http://www.ndci.org/dwi_drug_court.htm

MacDonald JM Morral AR Raymond B Eibner C . The efficacy of the Rio Hondo DUI Court: a 2-year field experiment. Eval Rev 2007;31:4–23.

Fed. R. Evid. 702.

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 509 U.S. 579 (1993).

Hoge MA Tebes J Kraemer Davidson L Griffith EEH . The roles of behavioral health professionals in class action litigation. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2002;30:49–58.

Hammond CB Schwartz PA . Ethical issues related to medical expert testimony. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106(5 Pt 1):1055–8.

Samet JM . Reflections: testifying in the Minnesota tobacco lawsuit. Tob Control 1999;8:101–5.

Eaton DL Kalman D . Scientists in the courtroom: basic pointers for the expert scientific witness. Environ Health Perspect 1994;102:668–72.

Vernick JS Rutkow L Teret SP . Public health benefits of recent litigation against the tobacco industry. JAMA 2007;298:86–9.

Ennis BJ . Symposium on Supreme Court advocacy: effective amicus briefs. Catholic University Law Rev 1984;33:603–9.

Judicial Conference of the United States. Committee on Codes of Conduct Advisory Opinion No. 67. Washington: Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts; 1980 Aug 25 [revised 1998 Jul 10; revised 2004 Aug 16]. Also available from: URL: http://www.uscourts.gov/guide/vol2/67.html [cited 2009 Mar 17].

Kendall DT Rylander JC . Tainted justice: how private judicial trips undermine public confidence in the judiciary. Geo J Legal Ethics 2004;18:65–134.

Kendall DT Sorkin E . Nothing for free: how private judicial seminars are undermining environmental protections and breaking the public's trust. Harvard Environmental Law Rev 2001;25:405–51.

Judicial Conference of the United States. Judicial Conference policy on judges' attendance at privately funded educational programs. Washington: Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts; 2006 Sep 19. Also available from: URL: http://www.uscourts.gov/Press_Releases/judbrappc906c.pdf [cited 2009 Mar 17].

Family Violence Prevention Fund. National Judicial Institute on Domestic Violence [cited 2009 Mar 17]. Available from: URL: http://www.endabuse.org/content/features/detail/769

Vernick JS . Lobbying and advocacy for the public's health: what are the limits for non-profit organizations? Am J Public Health 1999;89:1425–9.

Frattaroli S Kuhn VT Bishai D Mair JS Gielen A . Evaluating MADD's Court Monitoring Program: informing advocacy through science: a mid-course progress report. Poster session presented at the Substance Abuse Policy Research Program Annual Grantee Meeting; 2005 Dec 15; Tucson, Arizona.

Probst J Lewis J Asunka K Hersey J Oram S . Assessment of citizen group court monitoring programs. DOT HS 807 113. Washington: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 1987.

Shinar D . Impact of court monitoring on the adjudication of driving while intoxicated (DWI). Accid Anal Prev 1992;24:167–79.