We analyzed internal tobacco industry documents that describe the industry's response to the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT), a multi-center community-based tobacco intervention project funded by the National Cancer Institute from 1988 to 1992. Our analysis of documents from the Legacy Tobacco Documents Library (www.legacy.library.ucsf.edu) suggests that the tobacco industry reacted to COMMIT by (1) closely monitoring trial activities, (2) confronting COMMIT in communities where it was most active, (3) distorting COMMIT findings on underage smoking data reported in the media, and (4) using COMMIT activities as practice to strengthen their attack against the subsequent ASSIST trial, falsely accusing both studies of illegal political lobbying with taxpayers' money.
The tobacco industry closely monitored COMMIT activities and organized local responses to findings and activities perceived as threatening to the industry's public image or interests. Although we could not document a concerted attack by the tobacco industry that impacted the results of the COMMIT trial, data suggest that the industry used COMMIT as a learning opportunity to mount a well orchestrated and potentially damaging response to the larger American Stop Smoking Intervention Study for Cancer Prevention Trial.
References
1.
TrochimWMStillmanFAClarkPISchmittCL. Development of a model of the tobacco industry's interference with tobacco control programmes. Tob Control2003;12:140–7.
2.
ChapmanS. “We are anxious to remain anonymous”: the use of third party scientific and medical consultants by the Australian tobacco industry, 1969 to 1979. Tob Control2003;12(Suppl 3):iii31–7.
3.
OngEKGlantzSA. Constructing “sound science” and “good epidemiology”: tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms. Am J Public Health2001;91:1749–57.
4.
Bryan-JonesKBeroLA. Tobacco industry efforts to defeat the occupational safety and health administration indoor air quality rule. Am J Public Health2003;93:585–92.
5.
BeroLAGalbraithARennieD. Sponsored symposia on environmental tobacco smoke. JAMA1994;271:612–7.
6.
FieldsNChapmanS. Chasing Ernst L Wynder: 40 years of Philip Morris' efforts to influence a leading scientist. J Epidemiol Community Health2003;57:571–8.
7.
BittonANeumanMDBarnoyaJGlantzSA. The p53 tumour suppressor gene and the tobacco industry: research, debate, and conflict of interest. Lancet2005;365:531–40.
8.
TongEKEnglandLGlantzSA. Changing conclusions on secondhand smoke in a sudden infant death syndrome review funded by the tobacco industry. Pediatrics2005;115:e356–66.
9.
MuggliMEForsterJLHurtRDRepaceJL. The smoke you don't see: uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies. Am J Public Health2001;91:1419–23.
10.
WhiteJBeroLA. Public health under attack: the American Stop Smoking Intervention Study (ASSIST) and the tobacco industry. Am J Public Health2004;94:240–50.
11.
National Cancer Institute. ASSIST: shaping the future of tobacco prevention and control. Tobacco Control Monograph No. 16. NIH Pub. No. 05-5645. Bethesda (MD): Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2005 May.
12.
COMMIT Research Group. Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT): summary of design and intervention. J Natl Cancer Institute1996;83:1620–8.
13.
Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT): I. Cohort results from a four-year community intervention. Am J Public Health1995;85:183–92.
14.
Community intervention trial for smoking cessation (COMMIT): II. Changes in adult cigarette smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health1995;85:193–200.
15.
BeroL. Implications of the tobacco industry documents for public health and policy. Annu Rev Public Health2003;24:267–88.
MaloneREBalbachED. Tobacco industry documents: treasure or quagmire?Tob Control2000;9:334–8.
18.
SpriggsN. National Cancer Institutes new anti-smoking program—COMMIT (1988). Bates Number: 670840466 [cited 2005 Apr 9]. Available from: URL: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/zpn43f00
KloepferWJr. For your information, at a meeting of the board of scientific counselors of the division of cancer prevention and control at NCI the other day, funding of $42.5 million was approved for the community intervention trial for smoking [Apr 9]. Available from: URL: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/fwb24d00
YostIT. My attached copy of letter to the mayor is self-explanatory, but I wish to protest, emphatically, over city youth bureau participation in COMMIT-sponsored “media events” (1991). Bates Number: 507703514 [cited 2005 Apr 9]. Available from: URL: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/uet28c00
VernerKL. Information on Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT) (1992). Bates Number: 511385213/5213 [cited 2005 Apr 9]. Available from: URL: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/izy43d00
28.
Fact Sheet on TAPS analysis and commit analysis (no date). Bates Number Defendant: 513866379/6380, Bates Number Plaintiff: RJR434794/4795 [cited 2005 Apr 9]. Available from: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/yla72d00
29.
RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company. On March 25, you chartered statistics from a recent center for disease control article on the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT) smoking study for an article bylined by Dr. Antonio Novello (1992). Bates Number: 515011411/1412 [cited 2005 Apr 9]. Available from: URL: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/kbg03d00
Federal tax funding to ASSIST state tobacco control lobbying (1994). Bates Number: 88028909/8911 [cited 2005 Apr 9]. Available from: URL: http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/lnu20e00
MaloneRE. Tobacco industry surveillance of public health groups: the case of STAT (Stop Teenage Addiction to Tobacco) and INFACT (Infant Formula Action Coalition). Am J Public Health2002;92: 955–60.
