CarroliGRooneyCVillarJ2001. How effective is antenatal care in preventing maternal mortality and serious morbidity? An overview of the evidence. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 15(Suppl 1):1–42.
Ministry of Health of Vietnam, editor. National guideline for practice at commune level for the period 2001-2010. Hanoi: MOH; 2002.
11.
KessnerDM SJKalkCESchle-SingerER, editors. Infant death: an analysis by maternal risk and health care. Washington: Institute of Medicine and National Academy of Sciences; 1973.
12.
AlexanderGRKotelchuckM. Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research. Public Health Rep2001; 116:306–16
13.
KotelchuckM. An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of Prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index. Am J Public Health1994; 84:1414–20.
14.
KoroukianSMRimmAA. The “Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization” (APNCU) index to study low birth weight: is the index biased?J Clin Epidemiol2002; 55:296–305.
15.
BeckerSPetersDHGrayRHGultianoCBlackRE. The determinants of use of maternal and child health services in Metro Cebu, the Philippines. Health Transit Rev1993; 3:77–89.
16.
World Health Organization. Antenatal care in developing countries: promises, achievements and missed oppotunities. An analysis of trends, levels and differentials, 1990-2001. Geneva: WHO; 2003. p 32.
17.
GiffordBD. Quality care in a medicaid managed care program: adequacy of prenatal care for teens in Chicago. Public Health Nurs2001; 18:236–42.
18.
KoganMDAlexanderGRKotelchuckMNageyDAJackBW. Comparing mothers' reports on the content of prenatal care received with recommended national guidelines for care. Public Health Rep1994; 109:637–46.
19.
KotelchuckMKoganMDAlexanderGRJackBW. The influence of site of care on the content of prenatal care for low-income women. Matern Child Health J1997; 1:25–34.
20.
HaasJSBermanSGoldbergABLeeLWCookEF. Prenatal hospitalization and compliance with guidelines for prenatal care. Am J Public Health1996; 86:815–9.
21.
PeabodyJWGertlerPJLeibowitzA. The policy implications of better structure and process on birth outcomes in Jamaica. Health Policy1998; 43:1–13.
22.
BloomSSLippeveldTWypijD. Does antenatal care make a difference to safe delivery? A study in urban Uttar Pradesh, India. Health Policy Plan1999; 14:38–48.
23.
National Committee for Population and Family Planning. Demographic and Health Survey 1997 Hanoi, Vietnam: National Committee for Population and Family Planning; 1997.
24.
National Committee for Population and Family Planning. Demographic and Health Survey 2002 Hanoi, Vietnam: National Committee for Population and Family Planning; 2002.
25.
Vu QuyNhan LTPMNguyenTrong HauMillerRAKaneTTStoeckelJLongLD, A situation analysis of public sector reproductive health services in seven provinces of Vietnam. Hanoi: Vietnam Population Council, Ministry of Health and UNFPA; 2000. p. 117.
26.
ToanNVHoaHTThachNTHojerBPerssonLA. Utilization of reproductive health services in a mountainous area in Vietnam. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health1996; 27:325–32.
27.
ToanNVHoaHTTrongPVHojerBPerssonLASundstromK. Utilization of reproductive health services in rural Vietnam; are there equal opportunities to plan and protect pregnancies?J Epidemiol Community Health1996; 50:451–5.
28.
Ministry of Health of Vietnam. National standards and guidelines for reproductive health care services. Hanoi: MOH; 2002.
29.
StataCorp.Stata Statistical Software: Release 8.2. ed., College Station, TX: Stata Corporation, 2004.
30.
SwensonIEThangNMNhanVQTieuPX. Factors related to the utilization of prenatal care in Vietnam. J Trop Med Hygiene1993; 96:76–85.