PennellJFrancisS. Safety conferencing: toward a coordinated and inclusive response to safeguard women and children. Violence Against Women2005; 11:666–92.
2.
MaxwellCDGarnerJHFaganJA. The effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: new evidence from spouse assault replication program. Research in brief. Washington: Department of Justice (US), National Institute of Justice; 2001.
3.
JacksonSFederLFordeRDDavisCRMaxwellDCTaylorBG. Batterer intervention programs: where do we go from here? Washington: Department of Justice (US), National Institute of Justice; NCJ Publication No. 195079; 2003.
4.
MillsLG. The justice of recovery: how the state can heal the violence of crime. Hastings Law J2006; 57:457–508.
5.
StrausM. The controversy over domestic violence by women: a methodological, theoretical, and sociology of science analysis. In: ArriagaXBOskampS, editors. Violence in intimate relationships. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1999. p. 17–44.
6.
PeledEEisikovitsZEnoshGWinstokZ. Choice and empowerment for battered women who stay: toward a constructivist model. Social Work2000; 45:9–24.
7.
BarnettOMiller-PerrinCPerrinR. Family violence across the lifespan: an introduction. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1997.
8.
CampbellJRoseLKubJNeddD. Voices of strength and resistance: a contextual and longitudinal analysis of women's responses to battering. J Interpers Violence1998; 13:743–62.
9.
GriffingSRaginDFSageREMadryLBinghamLEPrimmBJ. Domestic violence survivors' self-identified reasons for returning to abusive relationships. J Interpers Violence2002; 17:306–19.
10.
OkunL. Termination or resumption of cohabitation in woman battering relationships: a statistical study. In: HotalingGTFinkelhorDKirkpatrickJTStrausMA, editors. Coping with family violence: research and policy perspectives. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage Publications; 1988. p. 107–19.
KroppPHartS. The spousal assault risk assessment (SARA) guide: reliability and validity in adult male offenders. Law Hum Behav2000; 24:101–18.
14.
GoodmanLADuttonMABennettL. Predicting repeat abuse among arrested batterers: use of the Danger Assessment Scale in the criminal justice system. J Interpers Violence2000; 15:63–74.
KeilitzSGuerreroRJonesAMRubioDM. Specialization of domestic violence case management in the courts: a national survey. Washington: National Center for State Courts, National Institute of Justice; 2001. NCJ Publication 186192.
17.
FederLWilsonDB. A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: can courts affect abusers' behavior?J Exp Criminol2005; 1:239–62.
18.
PenceEPaymarMRitmeesterTShepardM. Education groups for men who batter: the Duluth Model. New York: Springer: 1993.
19.
GondolfEWWilliamsO. Culturally-focused batterer counseling for African American men. Trauma Violence Abuse2001; 2:283–95.
20.
AdamsD. Treatment models of men who batter: a pro-feminist analysis. In: YllöKABogradM. editors. Feminist perspectives on wife abuse. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications. p. 177–99.
21.
KellyL. Disabusing the definition of domestic abuse: how women batter men and the role of the feminist state. Florida State University Law Rev2003; 30;791–855.
22.
EhrensaftMKCohenPBrownJSmailesEChenHJohnsonJG. Intergenerational transmission of partner violence: a 20-year prospective study. J Consult Clin Psychol2003; 71:741–53.
23.
StrausMGellesR. Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys. J Marriage Fam1986; 48:465–79.
24.
MillsLG. The heart of intimate abuse: new interventions in child welfare, criminal justice, and health settings. New York: Springer Publishing Co., Family Violence Series; 1998.
25.
CavanaughMMGellesRJ. New directions for research, policy, and practice. J Interpers Violence2005; 20:155–66.
26.
DuttonMAHoltzworth-MunroeAJourilesEMcDonaldRKrishnanSMcFarlaneJSullivanC. Recruitment and retention in intimate partner violence research [cited 2005 Apr 1]. Washington: Department of Justice (US), National Institute of Justice; 2003. NCJ Publication No. 201943. Available from: URL: http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/nij/201943.pdf
27.
HeckertDAGondolfEW. Predicting levels of abuse and re-assault among batterer program participants (final report) [cited 2004 May 1]. Washington: Department of Justice (US), National Institute of Justice; 2001. NCJ Publication No. 195176. Available from: URL: http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/nij/grants/195176.pdf
28.
SaundersDGHamillRM. Violence against women: synthesis of research on offender interventions. Washington: Department of Justice (US), National Institute of Justice; 2003.
29.
DavisRTaylorB. Does batterer treatment reduce violence?Women Crim Justice1999; 10:69–93.
30.
GondolfEW. Culturally-focused batterer counseling for African-American men [cited 2006 Apr 3]. Washington: Department of Justice (US), National Institute of Justice; 2005. Availabale from: URL: http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/210828.pdf
31.
StuartGLRamseySEMooreTMKahlerCWFarrellLERecuperoPRBrownRA. Reductions in marital violence following treatment for alcohol dependence. J Interpers Violence2003; 18:1112–31.
32.
BraithwaiteJ. Restorative justice: assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts. Crime and Justice1999; 25:1–127.
33.
ZehrH. The little book of restorative justice. Intercourse (PA): Good Books Press; 2002.
34.
MirskyL. (2004, May). Restorative justice practices of Native American, first nation and other indigenous people of North America [cited 2006 Mar 30]. E-Forum on-line. Available from: URL: http://www.realjustice.org/library/natjust2.html
35.
WalkerLHayashiLA. Pono kaulike: a pilot restorative justice program. Hawaii Bar J2004;May:4, 6–7, 9–15.
36.
BurfordGPennellJ. Family group decision making: new roles for “old” partners in resolving family violence: implementation report summary. St. John's (NF): Memorial University of Newfoundland: 1995.
37.
PranisK. Restorative values and confronting family violence. In: StrangHBraithwaiteJ, editors. Restorative justice and family violence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 2002. p. 23–41.
38.
ShermanLW. Violence in the family: domestic violence and restorative justice: answering key questions. Va J Soc Policy Law2000; 8:263–7.
39.
RobinsonPH. The practice of restorative justice: the virtues of restorative processes, the vices of restorative justice. Utah Law Rev2003;375–88.
40.
MarunaS. Making good: how ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2001.
41.
BurfordGPennellJ. Family group decision making project: outcome report, Vol I. St. John's, Newfoundland: Memorial University of Newfoundland; 1995.
42.
ShermanLWBerkRA. The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. Am Sociol Rev1984; 49:261–72.
43.
BraithwaiteJ. Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2002.
44.
MillsLG. Insult to injury: rethinking our responses to intimate abuse. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 2003.
45.
Curtis-FawleySDalyK. Gendered violence and restorative justice: the views of victim advocates. Violence Against Women2005; 11: 603–38.
46.
EdlesonJ. The overlap between child maltreatment and woman battering. Violence Against Women1999; 5:134–54.
47.
StrangHBraithwaiteJ. Restorative justice and family violence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
48.
BuschR. Domestic violence and restorative justice initiatives. In: StrangHBraithwaiteJ, editors. Restorative justice and family violence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 223–48.
49.
CarterLS. Family team conferences in domestic violence cases: guidelines for practice [cited 2006 Mar 30]. Family Violence Prevention Fund; 2003. Available from: URL: http://endabuse.org/programs/display.php3?DocID=79
KossMBacharKHopkinsQ. Restorative justice for sexual violence: repairing victims, building community, and holding offenders accountable. Ann NY Acad Sci2003; 989:384–96.
52.
PennellJBurfordG. Feminist praxis: making family group conferencing work. In: StrangHBraithwaiteJ, editors. Restorative justice and family violence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2002. p. 108–27.
53.
UmbreitMZehrH. Restorative family group conferences: differing models and guidelines for practice. Fed Probat1996; 60(3):24–9.
HengeholdL. Remapping the event: institutional discourses and the trauma of rape. Signs2000; 26:189–214.
56.
MillsLG. Killing her softly: intimate abuse and the violence of state intervention. Harvard Law Rev1999; 113:550–613.
57.
PresserLGaarderE. Can restorative justice reduce battering? Some preliminary considerations. Soc Justice2000; 27:175–94.
58.
Pennsylvania Department of Child Welfare (PDCW), OCYF, Pennsylvania Child Welfare Training Program (2005). Family group conferencing/decision making as a practice with families experiencing sexual abuse and domestic violence. Child Welfare League of America [cited 2006 Apr 27]. Available from: URL: http://www.pacwcbt.pitt.edu/Organizational%20Effectiveness/Practice%20Reviews/FGCdv-sa.doc
59.
ChandlerSMGiovannucciM. Family group conferences: transforming traditional child welfare policy and practice. Family Court Rev2004; 42:216–31.
60.
New York University, Center on Violence and Recovery. Intimate violence and recovery; community violence and recovery [cited 2006 Mar 30]. Available from: URL: http://www.nyu.edu/cvr