Agriculture has been documented to be one of the most hazardous work environments for both adults and children. Adolescents may be especially vulnerable to adverse health effects from agricultural exposures due to the rapid growth and development experienced during those years. Separating the occupational, economic, and social issues in this population is difficult. Weak regulatory protection, lack of compliance with existing regulations, and gaps in service provision characterize the working conditions of adolescent farmworkers. Although there is increasing research on the impact of work organization on mental and physical health in adult working populations, there is a scarcity of research focused on this concept in young workers—and it remains virtually unaddressed in young farmworkers.
Work characteristics of the informal work sector, better delineated in international literature, should be considered when planning research or interventions in this at-risk population. Further, the population of adolescent farmworkers is diverse, and research strategies and interventions need to be targeted and tailored to the heterogeneous groups. This article addresses some of the nontraditional work factors associated with the less-than-formal work organization and environments in the farmworker adolescent population and how these factors may inform the planning of research and interventions. Specifically, mobility, cultural patterns and social networks, alternative sampling strategies, alternative delivery of health care and education, and involvement of a wide range of players in the work environment of adolescent farmworkers should all be considered when conducting research or planning programs for this population.
References
1.
SalazarMKNapolitanoMSchererJAMcCauleyLA. Hispanic adolescent farmworkers' perceptions associated with pesticide exposure. Western J Nurs Res2004;26:146–56.
2.
Department of Labor (US). Findings from the National Agricultural Workers Survey (NAWS): A demographic and employment profile of United States farmworkers. Washington: Dept. of Labor, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy, Office of Program Economics; 2000 Mar. Research Report No.: 8. Also available from: URL: http://www.dol.gov/asp/programs/agworker/report_8.pdf [cited 2005 July 7].
3.
GabbardSCarrollDBaronSSteegeA. Teens in crop agriculture: Paper prepared for the National Adolescent Farmworker Occupational Health and Safety Advisory Committee. Washington: U.S. Dept. of Labor; 1999.
4.
AcostaMS VelaLeeB, editors. Migrant and seasonal hired adolescent farmworkers: A plan to improve working conditions. Marshfield (WI): Marshfield Clinic; 2001.
5.
General Accounting Office (US). Child labor in agriculture: Characteristics and legality of work. Washington: U.S. General Accounting Office; 1998. Report No.: GAO/HEHS-98-112R.
6.
McCauleyLAStickerDBryanCLasarevMRSchererJA. Pesticide knowledge and risk perception among adolescent Latino farmworkers. J Agric Saf Health. 2002;8:397–409.
7.
WatersTRWilkinsJRIII. Prevention of musculoskeletal disorders for children and adolescents working in agriculture. Proceedings of DHHS Conference;2004 June. NIOSH Publication No.: 2004–119.
8.
WilkVA. Health hazards to children in agriculture. Am J Ind Med1993;24:282–90.
9.
McCurdySACarrollDJ. Agricultural injury. Am J Ind Med2000; 38:463–80.
10.
VillarejoD. The health of U.S. hired farm workers. Annu Rev Public Health2003;24:175–93.
11.
Department of Labor (US), Bureau of Labor Statistics. Survey of occupational injuries and illnesses. Washington: Bureau of Labor Statistics; 2003.
12.
BonautoDKKeiferMRivaraFPAlexanderBH. A community-based telephone survey of work and injuries in teenage agricultural workers. J Agric Saf Health2003;9:303–17.
13.
HeyerNJFranklinGRivaraFPParkerPHaugJA. Occupational injuries among minors doing farm work in Washington State: 1986 to 1989. Am J Public Health1992;82:557–60.
14.
Department of Labor (US). Youth employment in agriculture. In: The report on the youth labor force. Washington: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics; 2000. p. 52–7.
15.
CastilloDNLandenDDLayneLA. Occupational injury deaths of 16- and 17-year-olds in the United States. Am J Public Health1994;84:646–9.
16.
National Research Council, Institute of Medicine. Protecting youth at work: Health, safety, and development of working children and adolescents in the United States. Washington: National Academy Press; 1998.
17.
ArbuckleTEColeDCRitterLRipleyBD. Farm children's exposure to herbicides: Comparison of biomonitoring and questionnaire data. Epidemiology2004;15:187–94.
18.
GarryVF. Pesticides and children. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol2004;198:152–63.
19.
MeisterJS. The health of migrant farm workers. Occup Med1991;6:503–13.
20.
SlesingerDP. Health status and needs of migrant farm workers in the United States: A literature review. J Rural Health1992;8:227–34.
21.
CohenLRRunyanCWDunnKASchulmanMD. Work patterns and occupational hazard exposures of North Carolina adolescents in 4-H clubs. Injury Prev1996;2:274–7.
22.
FischerFMMartinsISOliveiraDCTeixeiraLRMdoR LatorreCooperSP. Occupational accidents among middle and high school students of the State of São Paulo, Brazil. Rev Saude Publica2003:37:351–6.
23.
McLaurinJA. Guidelines for the care of migrant farmworkers' children. Washington: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2000.
24.
GolubM. Adolescent health and the environment. Environ Health Perspect2000;108:355–62.
25.
ZahmSHWardMH. Pesticides and childhood cancer. Environ Health Perspect1998;106Suppl 3:893–908.
26.
FassaAGFacchiniLADall'agnolMMChristianiDC. Child labor and health: Problems and perspectives. Int J Occup Environ Health2000;6:55–62.
27.
MaganaCGHoveyJ. Psychosocial stressors associated with Mexican migrant farmworkers in the Midwest United States. J Immigr Health2003;5(2):75–86.
28.
FenskeRSimcoxNJ. Agricultural workers. In: LevyBWegmanDH, editors. Occupational health: Recognizing and preventing work-related disease. 3rd ed.Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.; 1995. p. 665–84.
29.
Environmental Protection Agency (US). Pesticide Worker Protection Standard Training, 40 C.F.R. Part 70.130 (1992).
30.
ArcuryTAQuandtSAMcCauleyL. Farmworkers and pesticides: Community-based research. Environ Health Perspect2000;108:787–92.
31.
General Accounting Office (US). Pesticides: Improvements needed to ensure the safety of farmworkers and their children. Washington: U.S. General Accounting Office; 2000. U.S. G.A.O. Report No.: RCED-00-40.
32.
National Advisory Council on Migrant Health. 1993Recommendation of the National Advisory Council on Migrant Health. Rockville (MD): Department of Health and Human Services (US), Bureau of Primary Health Care; 1993 May.
33.
McCurdySASamuelsSJCarrollDJBeaumontJJMorrinLA. Agricultural injury in California migrant Hispanic farm workers. Am J Ind Med. 2003;44:225–35.
34.
TumaJM. Mental health services for children: The state of the art. Am Psychol1989;44:188–99.
35.
CastanaresT. Outreach services. In: Migrant health issues. Monograph No. 5. Buda (TX): National Center for Farmworker Health, Inc.; 2001.
36.
SemmerNK. Job stress interventions and organization of work. In: QuickJCTetrickLE, editors. Handbook of occupational health psychology. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2003. p. 325–49.
37.
SkiöldL, editor. A look into modern working life. Stockholm: National Institute for Working Life; 2000.
38.
WisnerA. Por dentro do trabalho. In: Ergonomia: Método & técnica. São Paulo (Brazil): FTD/Oboré; 1987.
39.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Simple solutions: Ergonomics for farmworkers. Washington: NIOSH; 2001 Feb. NIOSH Pub. No.: 2001–111. Also available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/01-111pd.html [cited 2005 July 12].
40.
National Children's Center for Rural and Agricultural Health and Safety. North American guidelines for children's agricultural tasks [cited 2005 July 12]. Available from: URL: http://www.nagcat.org/
41.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. National Occupational Research Agenda: Organization of work, additional information [cited 2005 July 12]. Available from: URL: http://www2a.cdc.gov/nora/NaddinfoOrgWork.html
42.
SuutarinenJ. Management as a risk factor for farm injuries. J Agric Saf Health2004;10:39–50.
43.
GimenoDFelknorSABurauKDDelclosGL. Organizational and occupational risk factors associated with work-related accidents among public hospital workers in Costa Rica. Occup Environ Med2005;62:337–43.
44.
KarasekRABrissonCKawakamiNHoutmanIBongersPAmickB. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol1998;3:322–55.
45.
FischerFMOliveiraDCNagaiRTeixeiraLRLombardi-JúniorMMdoR Latorre. Job control, job demands, social support in the workplace and its relationships with health outcomes—a study of adolescents in São Paulo, Brazil. J Public Health2005;39:245–53.
46.
ZoharD. Safety climate in industry organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. J Appl Psychol1980;65:96–102.
47.
ZoharD. A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. J Appl Psychol2000;85:587–96.
48.
ZoharD. Safety climate: Conceptual and measurement issues. In: QuickJCTetrickLE, editors. Handbook of occupational health psychology. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2003. p. 123–42.
49.
CohenASmithMCohenHH. Safety program practices in high vs. low accident rate companies. An interim report. Cincinnati: Dept. HEW (US), NIOSH; 1975. Report No.: 75–185.
50.
SmithMJCohenHHCohenAClevelandRJ. Characteristics of successful safety programs. J Safety Res1978;10:5–15.
51.
GershonRRVlahovDFelknorSAVesleyDJohnsonPCDelclosGLMurphyLR. Compliance with universal precautions among health care workers at three regional hospitals. Am J Infect Control1995;23:225–36.
52.
GershonRRKarkashianCDGroschJWMurphyLREscamilla-CejudoAFlanaganPA. Hospital safety climate and its relationship with safe work practices and workplace exposure incidents. Am J Infect Control2000;28:211–21.
53.
DedobbeleerNBelandF. A safety climate measure for construction sites. J Safety Res1991;22:97–103.
54.
GillenMBaltzDGasselMKirschLVaccaroD. Perceived safety climate, job demands, and coworker support among union and nonunion injured construction workers. J Safety Res2002;33:33–51.
55.
AndersonJTHuntingKLWelchLS. Injury and employment patterns among Hispanic construction workers. J Occup Environ Med2000;42:176–86.
56.
General Accounting Office (US). Worker protection: Labor's efforts to enforce protections for day laborers could benefit from better data and guidance. Washington: U.S. General Accounting Office; 2002. Report No.: GAO-02-925.
57.
The Center to Protect Workers' Rights. The construction chart book. 3rd ed.Silverspring (MD): The Center to Protect Workers' Rights; 2002. Also available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/elcosh/docs/d0100/d000038/contents.html [cited 2005 July 12].
58.
FelknorSAAdayLABurauKDDelclosGLKapadiaAS. Safety climate and its association with injuries and safety practices in public hospitals in Costa Rica. Int J Occup Environ Health2000;6:18–25.
59.
FelknorSASequeiraLFWeingerMBurauKde MezervilleLDelclosGL. Worker safety training in public hospitals in Costa Rica. Int J Occup Environ Health2004;10:445–50.
60.
GriffinMANealA. Perceptions of safety at work: A framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. J Occup Health Psychol2000;5:347–58.
61.
SantanaVSLoomisDNewmanBHarlowSD. Informal jobs: Another occupational hazard for women's mental health?Int J Epidemiol1997;26:1236–42.
62.
SantanaVSLoomisD. Informal jobs and non-fatal work injuries. Ann Occup Hyg2004:48:147–57.
63.
SweetmanC. [Editorial.]Gender Dev1996;4:2–7.
64.
QuinlanMCMayhewCBohleP. The global expansion of precarious employment, work disorganization, and consequences for occupational health: A review of recent research. Int J Health Serv2001;31:507–36.
65.
LudermirABLewisG. Informal work and common mental disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol2003;38:485–9.
66.
KuhnSWoodingJ. The changing structure of work in the United States. In: LevensteinCWoodingJ, editors. Work, health, and environment: Old problems, new solutions. New York: Guildford Press; 1997. p. 19–40.
67.
PolivkaAE. Contingent and alternative work arrangements, defined. Monthly Labor Rev1996;119:3–9.
68.
General Accounting Office (US). Contingent workers: Incomes and benefits lag behind those of rest of workforce. Washington: U.S. General Accounting Office; 2000. Report No.: GAO/HEHS-00-76.
69.
Secretariat of the Commission for Labor Cooperation. The rights of nonstandard workers: A North American guide. Washington: Secretariat of the Commission for Labor Cooperation; 2003.
70.
PochmannM. O trabalho sob fogo cruzado: Exclusção, desemprego e precarização no final do século. São Paulo (Brazil): Contexto; 1999.
71.
LemkowL. The employed unemployed: The subterranean economy in Spain. Soc Sci Med1987;25:111–13.
FischerFMTeixeiraLROliveiraDSMartinsISLatorreMRDCooperSP. Accidents at work: Health risks for adolescents of two small towns of São Paulo State, Brazil. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Youth at Work: People and work research reports; 2002.
74.
MasonCEarle-RichardsonG. New York State child agricultural injuries: How often is maturity a potential contributing factor. Am J Ind Med2002; Suppl 2:36–42.
75.
KarasekRA. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Admin Sci Q1979;24:285–308.
76.
Department of Education (US), Office of the Under Secretary. The same high standards for migrant students: Holding Title 1 schools accountable. Volume II: Measurement of migrant student educational achievement: Final Report. Washington: Dept. of Education, Office of the Under Secretary; 2002. Also available from: URL: http://www.ed.gov/offices/OUS/PES/esed/title1-accountable/vol-ii.pdf [cited 2005 July 12].
77.
LarsonOWIIIDorisJ. Child maltreatment among U.S. East Coast migrant farm workers. Child Abuse Neglect1987;11:281–91.
78.
SmithMWKreutzerRAGoldmanLCasey-PaalAKizerKW. How economic demand influences access to medical care for rural Hispanic children. Med Care1996;34:1135–48.
79.
HoveyJD. Mental health and substance use. In: Migrant health issues. Monograph No. 4. Buda (TX): National Center for Farmworker Health; 2001.
80.
CooperSPWellerNFFoxEECooperSR. Comparative description of migrant farmworkers vs. other students attending rural south Texas schools: Substance use, work, and injuries. J Rural Health2005;21:361–6.
81.
PurnellLD. Mexican-Americans. In: PurnellLDPaulankaBJ, editors. Transcultural healthcare: A culturally competent approach. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 1998. p. 397–422.
82.
CooperSPBurauKHanisCHenryJMacNaughtonNRobisonT. Tracing migrant farmworkers in Starr County, Texas. Am J Ind Med2001;40:586–91.
83.
MinesR.MullenaxNSacaL. The binational farmworker health survey: An in-depth study of agricultural worker health in Mexico and the United States. Davis California Institute for Rural Studies; 2001 [cited 2005 July 15]. Available from: URL: http://www.cirsinc.org/rickfin2.pdf
84.
LozanoJA. Houston immigrant school approved. The Bryan-College Station Eagle2004 Sep 10.
85.
General Accounting Office (US). Decennial census: Lessons learned for locating and counting migrant and seasonal farm workers. Washington: U.S. General Accounting Office; 2003. Publication No.: GAO-03-605.
86.
ShermanJ. Invisible immigrants: Enumerating the residents of Parlier. Rural Calif Rep1996;7:4.
87.
SantanaVItaparicaMde AmorimAMAraújo-FilhoJBAraújoGOliveiraM. [Non-fatal work-related injuries among adolescents]. Cad Saude Publica2003;19:407–20.
88.
Earle-RichardsonGJenkinsPLSlingerlandDTMasonCMilesMMayJJ. Occupational injury and illness among migrant and seasonal farmworkers in New York State and Pennsylvania, 1997–1999: Pilot study of a new surveillance method. Am J Ind Med2003;44: 37–45.
89.
GwytherMEJenkinsM. Migrant farmworker children: Health status, barriers to care, and nursing innovations in health care delivery. J Pediatr Health Care1998;12:60–6.
90.
WatkinsELLarsonKHarlanCYoungS. A model program for providing health services for migrant farmworker mothers and children. Public Health Rep1990;105:567–9.
PowerJGByrdT. U.S.–Mexico border health: Issues for regional and migrant populations. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1998.
93.
WilliamsDM. La promotora: Linking disenfranchised residents along the border to the U.S. health care system. Health affairs (Project Hope)2001;20:212–8.
94.
ArcuryTQuandtSACraveyAJElmoreRCRussellGB. Farmworker reports of pesticide safety and sanitation in the work environment. Am J Ind Med2001;39:487–98.
95.
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, Pub. L. No. 91–596, 84 Stat. 1590(Dec. 29, 1970).
96.
AcostaMS Vela. White paper on an examination of the occupational risks and occupational safety and health communication needs of Spanish-speaking children who are employed or live on farms. In: Safety is seguridad: A workshop summary. Washington: National Academy of Sciences; 2003. Also available from: URL: http://www.nap.edu/openbook/0309087066/html/118.html [cited 2005 July 15].
97.
International Labour Organization. International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour 2000–2001: Progress and future priorities. Geneva: ILO; 2002.
