Cervical cancer mortality rates among the American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) population in North and South Dakota were five times the national average (15.6 per 100,000 vs. 3.1 per 100,000, age adjusted) when last evaluated (from 1989 through 1993). Our goals were to update the AI/AN population cervical cancer mortality rates and to present incidence rates for AI/AN women in the region.
Methods.
We reviewed charts for women diagnosed with invasive cervical cancer at Indian Health Service (IHS) facilities in North and South Dakota from 1994 through 1998 and collected information about cervical cancer screening and treatment history. Incidence and mortality rates were standardized to the 1970 U.S. population.
Results.
Twenty-one cases of invasive cervical cancer and eight deaths were identified. Annualized incidence and mortality rates were 11.5 per 100,000 and 4.5 per 100 000. These compare with national all-race/ethnicity rates of 8.5 per 100,000 and 2.7 per 100,000 for incidence and mortality. Fifteen (71%) of 21 cases were diagnosed due to symptoms.
Conclusions.
While cervical cancer mortality rates have declined, incidence and mortality rates among AI/AN women remain higher than in the general U.S. population. Increased use of pap tests and careful follow-up of abnormal results should be aggressively promoted among AI/AN women in North and South Dakota.
References
1.
CannistraSANiloffJM. Cancer of the uterine cervix. N Engl J Med1996;334:1030–8.
2.
HerreroR. Epidemiology of cervical cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr1996;(21):1–6.
3.
La VecchiaCFranceschiSDecarliAFasoliMGentileATognoniG. “Pap” smear and the risk of cervical neoplasia: quantitative estimates from a case-control study. Lancet1984;2:779–82.
4.
MacgregorJEMossSMParkinDMDayNE. A case-control study of cervical cancer screening in north east Scotland. BMJ1985;290:1543–6.
5.
Screening for cervical cancer. In: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services, 2nd ed.Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1996. p. 105–17.
6.
FinkDJ. Change in American Cancer Society Checkup Guidelines for detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin1988;38:127–8.
7.
PartinMRRith-NajarianSJSlaterJSKornJECobbNSolerJT. Improving cancer incidence estimates for American Indians in Minnesota. Am J Public Health1999;89:1673–7.
8.
BaquetCR. Native Americans' cancer rates in comparison with other peoples of color. Cancer1996;78(7Suppl 1):1538–44.
9.
NuttingPAFreemanWLRisserDRHelgersonSDPaisonoRHisnanickJ. Cancer incidence among American Indians and Alaska Natives, 1980 through 1987. Am J Public Health1993;83: 1589–98.
10.
BeckerTMWheelerCMKeyCRSametJM. Cervical cancer incidence and mortality in New Mexico's Hispanics, American Indians, and Non-Hispanic whites. West J Med1992;156:376–9.
11.
BleedDMRisserDRSperrySHellhakeDHelgersonSD. Cancer incidence and survival among American Indians registered for Indian Health Service care in Montana, 1982–1987. J Natl Cancer Inst1992;84:1500–5.
12.
LanierAPBulkowLRIrelandB. Cancer in Alaskan Indians, Eskimos, and Aleuts, 1969–1983: implications for etiology and control. Public Health Rep1989;104:658–64.
13.
FrostFTaylorVFriesE. Racial misclassification of Native Americans in a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results cancer registry. J Natl Cancer Inst1992;84:957–61.
14.
CobbNPaisanoRE. Patterns of cancer mortality among Native Americans. Cancer1998;83:2377–83.
15.
CobbNPaisanoRE. Cancer mortality among American Indians and Alaska Natives in the United States: regional differences in Indian Health, 1989–1993. Rockville (MD): Indian Health Service; 1997.
16.
GriffithSP. Indian Health Service embraces the electronic medical record. In: Successful strategies for increasing direct health care quality, accessibility, and economy for American Indians and Alaska Natives. Rockville (MD): Indian Health Service; 1997. p. 47–9.
17.
International classification of diseases, ninth edition, clinical modification. Salt Lake City: Medicode, Inc.; 1999.
National Center for Health Statistics mortality public-use tapes, 1979–1998. Hyattsville (MD): US National Center for Health Statistics; 2000.
20.
National Institutes of Health. SEERStat 4.0 cancer incidence public use database, 1973–1998 [CD-ROM]. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 2001.
21.
MillerBA, editor. Racial/ethnic patterns of cancer in the United States, 1988–1992. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute; 1996.
22.
DeanAGDeanJACoulombierDBrendelKASmithDCBurtonAH. Epi Info: Version 6, a word processing, database, and statistics program for public health on IBM-compatible microcomputers. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1996.
23.
SAS Institute. SAS User's Guide: Version 8.2. Cary (NC): SAS Institute, 2001.
24.
BreslowNEDayNE. Statistical methods in cancer research. vol 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991. p. 58–9.
25.
MarrettLDChaudryM. Cancer incidence and mortality in Ontario First Nations, 1968–1991. Cancer Causes Control2003;14(3):259–68.
26.
DavidsonMBulkowLBLanierAPSmithRAHawkinsIJensenHKiviatNB. Incidence of invasive cervical cancer preceded by negative screening in high-risk Alaska Native Women. Int J Epidemiol1994;23:238–45.
27.
ShermanMEKellyD. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive carcinoma following the report of three negative Papanicolaou smears: screening failures or rapid progression?Mod Pathol1992;5(3):337–42.
28.
KristensenFBSkyggebjergKDHolundBHolmKHansenMK. Analysis of cervical smears obtained within three years of the diagnosis of invasive cervical cancer. Acta Cytol1991;35:47–50.
29.
AttwoodMEWoodmanCBJLuesleyDJordanJA. Previous cytology in patients with invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Acta Cytol1985;29:108–10.
30.
GallupDCNolanTEHanlyMEOtkenLBGallupDGMaierRC. Characteristics of patients with rapidly growing cervical cancer. South Med J1997;90:611–5.
31.
SchwartzPEHadjimichaelOLowellDMMerinoMJJanerichD. Rapidly progressive cervical cancer: the Connecticut experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol1996;175 (4 Part 2):1105–9.
32.
GirouxJWeltyTKOliverFKKaurJSLeonardsonGCobbN. Low national breast and cervical cancer-screening rates in American Indian and Alaska Native women with diabetes. J Am Board Fam Pract2000;13:239–45.
33.
MahmoodianS. Cervical and breast cancer screening rates in Sioux Indian women. South Med J1997;90:316–20.
34.
BenardVBLeeNCPiperMRichardsonL. Race-specific results of Papanicolaou testing and the rate of cervical neoplasia in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1991–1998, United States. Cancer Causes Control2001;12:61–8.
