Public Health Chronicles

Krimsky S . The role of theory in risk studies. In: Krimsky S Golding D , editors. Social theories of risk. Westport (CT): London; 1992. p. 3–22.

Nelkin D . The language of risk: conflicting perspectives on occupational health. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1985. p. 200.

Lowi T . The end of liberalism. New York: Norton; 1979.

Walker JL . Mobilizing interest groups in America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1991.

Truman D . The governmental process. Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies Press; 1993.

Jasanoff SK . Is science socially constructed and can it still inform public policy? Sci Eng Ethics 1996;2:263–76.

Wallack L Dorfman L Jernigan D Themba M . Media advocacy and public health: power for prevention. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1993.

Jasanoff S . The technical discourse of government. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1995. p. 69–92.

Kingdon JW . Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.; 1984.

Mazmanian D Sabatier P . Implementation and public policy. Lanham (MD): University Press of America; 1989.

Sabatier PA . Toward better theories of the policy process. Political Sci Process 1991;147–56.

Stayner L . Protecting public health in the face of uncertain risks: the example of diesel exhaust. Am J Public Health 1999;89:991–3.

Ong EK Glantz SA . Constructing “Sound Science” and “Good Epidemiology”: tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms. Tob Control 2001;91:1–9.

Hirschhorn N Bialous S . Second-hand smoke and risk assessment: what was in it for the tobacco industry? Tob Control 2001;10:375–82.

Bialous S Yach D . Whose standard is it, anyway? how the tobacco industry determines the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards for tobacco products. Tob Control 2001; 10:96–104.

Bero L . Implications of the tobacco industry documents for public health and policy. Annu Rev Public Health 2003;24:267–88.

Glantz S Slade J Bero L Hanauer P . The cigarette papers. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1996.

Roper Organization. A study of public attitudes towards cigarette smoking and the tobacco industry in 1978. Vol. 1. Roper Organization; 1978.

Barnoya J Glantz S . The tobacco industry's worldwide ETS consultants project: European and Asian components. Eur J Public Health. In press.

Chapman S . Tobacco industry memo reveals passive smoking strategy. BMJ 1997;314:1569.

Muggli ME Forster JL Hurt RD Repace JL . The smoke you don't see: uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies. Am J Public Health 2001;91:1419–23.

Lexchin J Bero LA Djulbegovic B Clark O . Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ 2003;326:1167–70.

Barnes D Bero L . Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. JAMA 1998;279:1566–70.

Barnes DE Bero LA . Scientific quality of original research articles on environmental tobacco smoke. Tob Control 1997;6:19–26.

Malone RE Bero LA . Chasing the dollar: why scientists should decline tobacco industry funding. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57:546–8.

Bero L Barnes D Hanauer P Slade J Glantz S . Lawyer control of the tobacco industry's external research program: the Brown and Williamson documents. JAMA 1995;274:241–7.

Hanauer P Slade J Barnes D Bero L Glantz S . Lawyer control of internal scientific research to protect against products liability lawsuits: the Brown and Williamson documents. JAMA 1995; 274:234–40.

Barnes D Bero L . Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research. J Health Politics Policy Law 1996;21:515–42.

Center for Indoor Air Research. Request for applications: 1989–1990 research agenda. Center for Indoor Air Research; 1989.

Center for Indoor Air Research. Center for Indoor Air Research 1992 research agenda and request for applications. Center for Indoor Air Research; 1992.

Tobacco Institute. Tobacco smoke and the non-smoker: scientific integrity at the crossroads. Tobacco Institute; 1986.

Turner S Cyr S Gross A . The measurement of environmental tobacco smoke in 585 office environments. Environ Int 1992;18:19–28.

Hirschhorn N Bialous SA Shatenstein S . Philip Morris' new scientific initiative: an analysis. Tob Control 2001;10:247–52.

Bero LA Galbraith A Rennie D . Sponsored symposia on environmental tobacco smoke. JAMA 1994;271:612–7.

Barnoya J Glantz S . Tobacco industry success in preventing regulation of secondhand smoke in Latin America: the “Latin Project.” Tob Control 2002;11:305–14.

National Research Council. Environmental tobacco smoke: measuring exposures and assessing health effects. Washington: National Academy Press; 1986.

Department of Health and Human Services (US). The health consequences of involuntary smoking: a report of the Surgeon General. Washington: DHHS; 1986.

Schotland MS Bero LA . Evaluating public commentary and scientific evidence submitted in the development of a risk assessment. Risk Anal 2002;22:131–40.

Chapman S Borland R Hill D Owen N Woodward S . Why the tobacco industry fears the passive smoking issue. Int J Health Serv 1990;20:417–27.

Bero LA Glantz SA . Tobacco industry response to a risk assessment of environmental tobacco smoke. Tob Control 1993;2:103–13.

RJR Reynolds Tobacco Company. Passive smoking: an active controversy [advertisement], circa 1993.

Rochon P . Evaluating the quality of articles published in journal supplements compared with the quality of those published in the parent journals. JAMA 1994;272:108–13.

Cho MK Bero LA . The quality of drug studies published in symposium proceedings. Ann Int Med 1996;124:485–9.

Montini T Bero LA . Policy makers' perspectives on tobacco control advocates' roles in regulation development. Tob Control 2001; 10:218–24.

Montini T Mangurian C Bero LA . Assessing the evidence submitted in the development of a workplace smoking regulation: the case of Maryland. Public Health Rep 2002;117:291–8.

Dickersin K Min Y-I Meinert CL . Factors influencing publication of research results: follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. JAMA 1992;267:374–8.

Armitage AK . Environmental tobacco smoke and coronary heart disease. J Smoking-Relat Dis 1993;4:27–36.

Bero LA Glantz SA Rennie D . Publication bias and and public health policy on environmental tobacco smoke. JAMA 1994;272: 133–6.

Misakian S Bero L . Publication bias and research on passive smoking. JAMA 1998;280:250–3.

Bero L Rennie D . The Cochrane Collaboration: preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care. JAMA 1995;274:1935–8.

Hong MK Bero LA . How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke. BMJ 2002;325:1413–6.

Slade J Bero L Hanauer P Barnes D Glantz S . Nicotine and addiction: the Brown and Williamson documents. JAMA 1995; 274:225–33.

Barnes D Hanauer P Slade J Bero L Glantz S . Environmental tobacco smoke: the Brown and Williamson documents. JAMA 1995;274:248–53.

Rennie D . Smoke and letters [editorial]. JAMA 1993;270:1742–3.

Raymond CA . Risk in the press: conflicting journalistic ideologies. In: Nelkin D . The language of risk. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage Publications; 1985. p. 87–132.

Kennedy G Bero L . Print media coverage of research on passive smoking. Tob Control 1999;8:254–60.

Malone R Boyd E Bero L . Science in the news: journalists' constructions of passive smoking as a social problem. Soc Stud Sci 2001;30:713–35.

Roth AL Dunsby J Bero LA . Framing processes in public commentary on US federal tobacco control regulation. Soc Stud Sci 2003;33:7–44.

Bero LA Montini T Bryan-Jones K Mangurian C . Science in regulatory policy making: case studies in the development of workplace smoking restrictions. Tob Control 2001;10:329–36.

Bryan-Jones K Bero L . Tobacco industry efforts to defeat the occupational safety and health administration indoor air quality rule. Am J Public Health 2003;93:585–92.

Jasanoff S . EPA's regulation of daminozide: unscrambling the messages of risk. Sci Technol Hum Values 1987;12:116–24.

Silbergeld E . Risk assessment: the perspective and experience of U.S. environmentalists. Environ Health Perspect 1993;101:100–4.

Wilson JQ . Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1989.

Environmental Protection Agency (US). Respiratory health effects of passive smoking: lung cancer and other disorders. Washington: EPA, Office of Research and Development, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment; 1992.

California Environmental Protection Agency. Health effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Sacramento: California Environmental Protection Agency; 1997.

Mangurian C Bero L . Lessons learned from the tobacco industry's efforts to prevent the passage of a workplace smoking regulation. Am J Public Health 2000;90:1926–30.

Hirayama T . Non-smoking wives of heavy smokers have a higher risk of lung cancer: a study from Japan. BMJ 1981;282:183–5.

Lee PN . “Marriage to a smoker” may not be a valid marker of exposure in studies relating environmental tobacco smoke to risk of lung cancer in Japanese non-smoking women. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1995;67:287–94.

Bekelman J Li Y Gross C . Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. JAMA 2003;289:454–65.

Bero LA Rennie D . Influences on the quality of published drug studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1996;12:209–37.

Nestle M . Food politics: how the food industry influences nutrition and health. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2002.

Levine J Gussow J Hastings D Eccher A . Authors' financial relationships with the food and beverage industry and their published positions on the fat substitute olestra. Am J Public Health 2003; 93:664–9.

Markowitz G Rosner D . Deadly dust: silicosis and the politics of occupational disease in twentieth century America. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1991.

Markowitz G Rosner D . “Cater to the children”: the role of the lead industry in a public health tragedy, 1900–1955. Am J Public Health 2000;90:36–46.

Markowitz G Rosner D . Deceit and denial: the deadly politics of industrial pollution. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2002.

Boyd E Bero L . Assessing faculty financial relationships with industry. JAMA 2000;284:2209–38.

von Winterfeldt D . Expert knowledge and public values in risk management: the role of decision analysis. In: Krimsky S Golding D , editors. Social theories of risk. Westport (CT): London; 1992. p. 321–42.

Cho M . Fundamental conflict of interest. BioMedNet Magazine 1998;24.

Krimsky S . Science in the private interest. Lanham (MD): Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.; 2003.

Dana J . Harm avoidance and financial conflict of interest. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Bosch Institute; 2003. p. 1–18.

Schafer A . Biomedical conflicts of interest: a defence of the sequestration thesis. J Med Ethics 2003:1–40 [cited 2004 Nov]. Available from: URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=14872066

Shamoo AE Resnik DB . Responsible conduct of research. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.

Boyd EA Cho MK Bero LA . Financial conflict-of-interest policies in clinical research: issues for clinical investigators. Acad Med 2003;78:769–74.

Herman R . Harvard School of Public Health faculty votes not to accept funds from the tobacco companies and subsidiaries [press release]. Boston: Harvard School of Public Health; 2002. p. 1–2.

Shield M . Policies and positions of other organizations on the funding controversy. TRDRP Newsletter. Burning Issues 2001;4:2–4.

Cohen J . Accepting tobacco funding for research: an overview of the issues. TRDRP Newsletter Burning Issues 2003;6:7–10.