Effects of UCS Intensity and Duration of Exposure of Nonreinforced CS on Conditioned Electrodermal Responses: An Experimental Analysis of the Incubation Theory of Anxiety 1
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 1993
Effects of UCS Intensity and Duration of Exposure of Nonreinforced CS on Conditioned Electrodermal Responses: An Experimental Analysis of the Incubation Theory of Anxiety 1
Eysenck's incubation theory of fear or anxiety was examined in a human Pavlovian conditioning experiment with skin-conductance responses as the dependent variable. The conditioned stimuli (CSs) were fear-relevant slides (snakes and spiders) and the unconditioned stimuli (UCSs) were aversive tones. Different groups of subjects were presented two tone intensities during the acquisition phase and three durations of nonreinforced CS (extinction phase) in a delay differential conditioning paradigm. Resistance to extinction of conditioned skin-conductance responses (conditioned fear responses) exhibited was largest for high intensity of tone and short presentations of the nonreinforced CS (CS + presented alone). The result tends to support Eysenck's incubation theory of anxiety.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BershP. J. (1980) Eysenck's theory of incubation: a critical analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 18, 11–17.
2.
BoydT. L. (1981) The effects of shock intensity on fear incubation (enhancement): a preliminary investigation of Eysenck's theory. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 19, 413–418.
3.
CookE. W., LangP. J., & HodesR. L. (1986) Preparedness and phobia: effects of stimulus content on human visceral conditioning. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 195–207.
4.
DykmanR., MackR., & AckermanP. (1965) The evaluation of autonomic and motor components of the unavoidance conditioned response in the dog. Psychophysiology, 1, 209–230.
5.
EhlersA., & MargrafJ. (1989) The psychophysiological model of panic attacks. In EmmelkampP. M. G., AveraerdW. T. A. M., KraaimaatF., & van SonM. J. M. (Eds.), Fresh perspectives on anxiety disorders.Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger. Pp. 1–29.
6.
EysenckH. J. (1979) The conditioning model of neurosis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 155–199.
7.
EysenckH. J. (1981) Behavior therapy and the conditioning model of neurosis. International Journal of Psychology, 16, 343–369.
8.
EysenckH. J. (1985) Incubation theory of fear/anxiety. In ReissS. & BootzinR. R. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy.Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Pp. 83–105.
9.
EysenckH. J. (1987) Behavior therapy. In EysenckH. J. & MartinI. (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of behavior therapy.New York: Plenum. Pp. 3–35.
10.
GeerJ. H. (1965) The development of a scale to measure fear. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 3, 45–53.
11.
GrantD. A. (1964) Classical and operant conditioning. In MeltonA. W. (Ed.), Categories of human learning.New York: Academic Press. Pp. 1–31.
12.
HugdahlK. (1978) Electrodermal conditioning to potentially phobic stimuli: effects of instructed extinction. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 16, 315–321.
13.
HugdahlK., & ÖhmanA. (1977) Effects of instruction on acquisition and extinction of electrodermal response to fear-relevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 608–618.
14.
JacobsW. T., & BlackburnJ. R. (1987) Incubation of conditional suppression is an associatively-based phenomenon. Pavlovian Journal of Behavioral Science, 22, 118–121.
15.
KaloupekD. G. (1983) The effect of compound in vivo and imaginal exposure: a test of fear enhancement model. Behaviour Therapy, 14, 345–356.
16.
KelleyM. J. (1987) Hormones and clinical anxiety: an imbalanced neuromodulation of attention. In EysenckH. J. & MartinI. (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of behavior therapy.New York: Plenum. Pp. 379–402.
17.
LykkenD. T., & VenablesP. H. (1971) Direct measurement of skin conductance: a proposal for standardization. Psychophysiology, 8, 656–672.
18.
McNallyR. J. (1987) Preparedness and phobias: a review. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 283–303.
19.
McNallyR. J., & ReissS. (1982) The preparedness theory of phobias and human safety-signal conditioning. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 20, 153–159.
20.
MerckelbachH., van den HoutM. A., & van der MolenG. M. (1989) The phylogenetic origin of phobias: a review of the evidence. In EmmelkampP. M. G., AveraerdW. T. A. M., KraaimaatF., & van SonM. J. M. (Eds.), Fresh perspectives on anxiety disorders.Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger. Pp. 87–100.
21.
MillerB. V., & LevisD. J. (1971) The effects of varying short visual exposure times to a phobic fear stimulus on subsequent avoidance behavior. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 9, 17–21.
22.
NicholaichukT. P., QuesnelL. J., & TaitR. W. (1982) Eysenck's theory of incubation: an empirical test. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 20, 329–338.
23.
ÖhmanA. (1979) Fear relevance, autonomic conditioning and phobias: a laboratory model. In SjödenP. O., BatesS., & DockensS. W. (Eds.), Trends in behavior therapy.New York: Academic Press. Pp. 107–131.
24.
ÖhmanA. (1986) Face the beast and fear the face: animal and social fears as prototypes for evolutionary analysis of emotion. Psychophysiology, 23, 123–145.
25.
ÖhmanA., DimbergU., & ÖstL. G. (1985) Animal and social phobias: biological constraints on learned fear responses. In ReissS. & BootzinR. R. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in behavior therapy.Orlando, FL: Academic Press. Pp. 123–175.
26.
ÖhmanA., FredriksonM., & HugdahlK. (1978) Towards an experimental model of simple phobic reactions. Behavioural Analysis and Modification, 2, 97–114.
27.
ÖhmanA., FredriksonM., HugdahlK., & RimmöP. A. (1976) The premise of equipotentiality in human classical conditioning: conditioned electrodermal responses to potentially phobic stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 313–337.
28.
ProkasyW. F., & KumpferK. L. (1973) Classical conditioning. In ProkasyW. F. & RaskinD. C. (Eds.), Electrodermal activity in psychological research.New York: Academic Press. Pp. 157–202.
29.
RichardsM., & MartinI. (1990) Eysenck's incubation fear hypothesis: an experimental test. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 373–384.
30.
RohrbaughM., & RiccioD. C. (1970) Paradoxical enhancement of learned fear. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 75, 210–216.
31.
RohrbaughM., RiccioD. C., & ArthurA. (1972) Paradoxical enhancement of conditioned suppression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 10, 125–130.
32.
SandínB., & ChorotP. (1989) The incubation theory of fear anxiety: experimental investigation in a human laboratory model of Pavlovian conditioning. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 27, 9–18.
33.
SartoryG., & EysenckH. J. (1976) Strain differences in acquisition and extinction of fear responses in rats. Psychological Reports, 38, 163–187.
34.
SartoryG., & EysenckH. J. (1978) Fear conditioning and extinction in rats at different times of day. Journal of General Psychology, 99, 87–92.
35.
SeugmanM. E. P. (1971) Phobias and preparedness. Behavior Therapy, 2, 307–320.
36.
SiddleD. A. T., BondN. W., & FriswellR. (1987) Effects of stimulus content on second-order electrodermal conditioning in humans. Psychophysiology, 24, 439–448.
37.
StoneN. M., & BorkovecT. D. (1975) The paradoxical effect of brief CS exposure on analogue phobic subject. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 13, 51–54.
38.
SueD. (1975) The effect of duration of exposure on systematic desensitization and extinction. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 13, 55–60.
39.
VenablesP. H., & ChristieM. J. (1980) Electrodermal activity. In MartinI. & VenablesP. H. (Eds.), Techniques in psychophysiology.New York: Wiley. Pp. 3–67.
