Reputation and Reactions to the Successful Plagiarising Professor

Abstract

Social media now allow the evaluation and documentation of people’s reputations online (e.g. upvotes and downvotes). The psychological mechanisms (Deservingness, Rivalry) associated with such evaluation were probed by considering reactions to vignettes outlining the success or failure of an honest or plagiarising professor. 109 participants completed the Tall Poppy scale, and provided their reactions to the vignettes on 5 point Likert scales, rating their Satisfaction, Amusement as well as attributions of Responsibility and Fairness, and willingness to support (Upvote or Donate). In a 2 × 2 Outcome (success/fail) by Context (original/plagiarised work) Multivariate Analysis of Variance there was significant disapproval of the successful plagiarist, and approval when the plagiarist failed. The strongest reactions elicited involved dissatisfaction and attributions of unfairness. Upvoting was less likely when plagiarism was reported. Strength of effects indicated that satisfaction and attributions of unfairness could be important components of people’s reactions. Upvoting and willingness to donate in support were greater when the Professor was honest and outcomes were unfair. People were more concerned when a vignette suggested a breakdown of the social order.

Keywords

academics attributions bullying disability & trauma entitlement mental & physical health moral reasoning social perceptions sociocultural issues in psychology sociocultural topics teaching,Violence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Shirako

(2008). Are individuals' reputations related to their history of behavior? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.320

Australian Government . (2021). Online Safety act 2021. https://www.legislation.gov.au/C2021A00076/latest/text

Baumard

André

J.-B.

Sperber

(2013). A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(1), 59–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11002202

Bos

Olson

Gergle

Olson

Wright

(2002). Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, April 20 - 25, 2002, (pp. 135–140). https://doi.org/10.1145/503376.503401

Buckels

E. E.

Trapnell

P. D.

Paulhus

D. L.

(2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67(1), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016

Cheng

Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil

Leskovec

(2014). How community feedback shapes user behavior. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14518

Cheng

J. T.

(2020). Dominance, prestige, and the role of leveling in human social hierarchy and equality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.10.004

Cikara

Bruneau

Van Bavel

J. J.

Saxe

(2014). Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.007

Cikara

Fiske

S. T.

(2013). Their pain, our pleasure: Stereotype content and schadenfreude. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1299(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12179

10.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

11.

Corritore

C. L.

Kracher

Wiedenbeck

(2003). On-line trust: Concepts, evolving themes, a model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6), 737–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00041-7

12.

Crysel

L. C.

Webster

G. D.

(2018). Schadenfreude and the spread of political misfortune. PLoS One, 13(9), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201754

13.

Doliński

(2018). Is psychology still a science of behaviour? Social Psychological Bulletin, 13(2), e25025. https://doi.org/10.5964/spb.v13i2.25025

14.

Eaton

Bridgman

Cummings

(2024). Advancing the democratization of work: A new intellectual history of transformational leadership theory. Leadership, 20(3), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150241232705

15.

European Union . (2022). Digital services act. https://commission.europa.eu/publications/legal-documents-digital-services-act_en

16.

Feather

N. T.

(1989). Attitudes towards the high achiever: The fall of the tall poppy. Australian Journal of Psychology, 41(3), 239–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049538908260088

17.

Feather

N. T.

(1998). Attitudes towards high achievers, self-esteem, and value priorities for Australian, American, and Canadian students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(6), 749–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022198296005

18.

Feather

N. T.

McKee

I. R.

(1993). Global self-esteem and attitudes toward the high achiever for Australian and Japanese students. Social Psychology Quarterly, 56(1), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786646

19.

Feather

N. T.

Mckee

I. R.

(2014). Deservingness, liking relations, schadenfreude, and other discrete emotions in the context of the outcomes of plagiarism. Australian Journal of Psychology, 66(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12030

20.

Feather

N. T.

McKee

I. R.

Bekker

(2011). Deservingness and emotions: Testing a structural model that relates discrete emotions to the perceived deservingness of positive or negative outcomes. Motivation and Emotion, 35(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9202-4

21.

Feather

N. T.

Wenzel

McKee

I. R.

(2013). Integrating multiple perspectives on schadenfreude: The role of deservingness and emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 37(3), 574–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9331-4

22.

Fujishiro

Gong

(2010). What does “occupation” represent as an indicator of socioeconomic status? Exploring occupational prestige and health. Social Science & Medicine, 71(12), 2100–2107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.026

23.

Giardini

Balliet

Power

E. A.

Számadó

Takács

(2022). Four puzzles of reputation-based cooperation. Human Nature, 33(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-021-09419-3

24.

Greenier

K. D.

(2015). Seeing you fall vs. taking you Down: The roles of agency and liking in schadenfreude. Psychological Reports, 116(3), 941–953. https://doi.org/10.2466/21.PR0.116k31w7

25.

Greenier

K. D.

(2017). The relationship between personality and schadenfreude in hypothetical versus live situations. Psychological Reports, 121(3), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117745562

26.

Greenier

K. D.

(2021). The roles of disliking, deservingness, and envy in predicting schadenfreude. Psychological Reports, 124(3), 1220–1236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120921358

27.

Guillory

Hancock

J. T.

(2012). The effect of Linkedin on deception in resumes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(3), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0389

28.

Havard

C. T.

Theiss-Morse

(2023). Investigating perceptions of out-groups in sport and United States politics. In Havard

(Ed.), Intense group behavior and brand negativity (pp. 13–55): Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23456-9_2

29.

Hinduja

Patchin

J. W.

(2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2010.494133

30.

Hoogland

C. E.

Schurtz

D. R.

Cooper

C. M.

Combs

D. J. Y.

Brown

E. G.

Smith

R. H.

(2015). The joy of pain and the pain of joy: In-group identification predicts schadenfreude and gluckschmerz following rival groups’ fortunes. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 260–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9447-9

31.

Hornik

Ofir

Rachamim

Grossman

(2023). The bittersweet smell of success: Malicious online responses to others achievements. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1085317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1085317

32.

Hornik

Rachamim

Grossman

(2021). Ripples of contempt: Aversive responses to others (mis)fortunes. Motivation and Emotion, 45(6), 809–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09905-2

33.

Jensen

Farnham

S. D.

Drucker

S. M.

Kollock

(2000). The effect of communication modality on cooperation in online environments. Paper presented at CHI2000, 1-6 APRIL, the hague, amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1145/332040.33247

34.

Joinson

A. N.

(2008). Looking at,’’ ‘‘looking up,’’ or ‘‘keeping up’’ with people? Motives and uses of Facebook. In: 26th annual SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, April 5–10, florence, Italy. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357213

35.

Kollock

(1999). The production of trust in online markets. Advances in Group Processes, 16(1), 99–123. Downloaded 19^th March 2026 from. https://www.connectedaction.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/1999-peter-kollock-the-production-of-trust-in-online-markets.htm

36.

Lam

S. K.

Frankowski

Riedl

(2006). Do you trust your recommendations? In Müller

(Ed.), Emerging trends in information and communication security. ETRICS 2006 Lecture Notes in Computer Science (3995, pp. 14–29). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/11766155_2

37.

Lange

Crusius

Hagemeyer

(2016). The evil queen's dilemma: Linking narcissistic admiration and rivalry to benign and malicious envy. European Journal of Personality, 30(2), 168–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2047

38.

Leach

C. W.

Spears

Branscombe

N. R.

Doosje

(2003). Malicious pleasure: Schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 932–943. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.932

39.

Leach

C. W.

Spears

Manstead

A. S. R.

(2015). Parsing (malicious) pleasures: Schadenfreude and gloating at others’ adversity. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 201. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00201

40.

Mann

Burnett

Radford

Ford

(1997). The Melbourne decision making questionnaire: An instrument for measuring patterns of coping with decisional conflict. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199703)10:1<1::AID-BDM242>3.0.CO;2-X

41.

Manrique

H. M.

Zeidler

Roberts

Barclay

Walker

Samu

Fariña

Bshary

Raihani

(2021). The psychological foundations of reputation-based cooperation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 376(1838), 20200287. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0287

42.

Martin

(2008). Plagiarism struggles. Plagiary: Cross‐disciplinary studies in plagiarism, fabrication, and falsification, 25(2), 4–5. Downloaded. 19^th March 2026 from. https://www.plagiary.org/editorials.html

43.

New Zealand Legislation . (2015). Harmful digital communications act 2015. https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2015/0063/latest/whole.html

44.

Nisbett

R. E.

Peng

Choi

Norenzayan

(2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.291

45.

Ong

(2015). Liability of internet intermediaries for user-generated content: An examination of oriental press group ltd v fevaworks solutions ltd. Computer Law & Security Review, 31(1), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2014.11.008

46.

Phillips

Kim

Vaeau

Landhuis

Wood

Wang

(2023). Pride, interest, and online willingness to support achievements across New Zealand European, Pasifika, and Korean ethnic groups. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 52(1), 47–56. Downloaded 17th September 2024 from. https://www.psychology.org.nz/application/files/5616/9344/5027/Phillips_47-56.pdf

47.

Phillips

J. G.

Diesfeld

Mann

(2019). Instances of online suicide, the law and potential solutions. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 26(3), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1506719

48.

Phillips

J. G.

Landhuis

C. E.

Wood

J. K.

Wang

(2022). High achievers, Schadenfreude and Gluckschmerz in New Zealanders and Chinese. PsyCh Journal, 11(6), 873–884. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.582

49.

Pietraszkiewicz

(2013). Schadenfreude and just world belief. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65(3), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12020

50.

Preece

Nonnecke

Andrews

(2004). The top five reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.015

51.

Qin

Buckley

(2022). Criticism of zhu yi, a U.s.-born skater, shows the harsh scrutiny of naturalized athletes in China. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/06/sports/olympics/zhu-yi-china-figure-skating.html.

52.

Riegelsberger

Sasse

M. A.

McCarthy

J. D.

(2005). The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(3), 381–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.01.001

53.

Rodan

(2004). A modest victory for academic values. Australian Universities Review, 46(2), 16–22. Downloaded 19^th March 2026 from. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=094c135349eda824b46afa97dc0b6900f66da1fd

54.

Santana

A. D.

(2014). Virtuous or vitriolic: The effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards. Journalism Practice, 8(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.813194

55.

Santana

A. D.

(2019). Toward quality discourse: Measuring the effect of user identity in commenting forums. Newspaper Research Journal, 40(4), 467–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532919873089

56.

Simmers

Anandarajan

(2018). The internet of people, things and services: Workplace transformations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315182407

57.

Smith

R. H.

Powell

C. A. J.

Combs

D. J. Y.

Schurtz

D. R.

(2009). Exploring the when and why of schadenfreude. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(4), 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00181.x

58.

Smith

R. H.

van Dijk

W. W.

(2018). Schadenfreude and gluckschmerz. Emotion Review, 10(4), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073918765657

59.

Suler

(2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295

60.

Tong

S. T.

(2013). Facebook use during relationship termination: Uncertainty reduction and surveillance. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(11), 788–793. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0549

61.

Tscharaktschiew

Rudolph

(2016). The who and whom of help giving: An attributional model integrating the help giver and the help recipient. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(1), 90–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2135

62.

UK Parliament . (2023). Online safety act 2023. Downloaded. 14th February 2023 from. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2023/50

63.

van de Ven

(2018). Schadenfreude and gluckschmerz are emotional signals of (im)balance. Emotion Review, 10(4), 305–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073918768883

64.

Van Dijk

W. W.

Ouwerkerk

J. W.

van Koningsbruggen

G. M.

Wesseling

Y. M.

(2012). “So you wanna be a pop star?”: Schadenfreude following another's misfortune on TV. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 168–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2012.656006

65.

Varnum

M. E. W.

Grossmann

Kitayama

Nisbett

R. E.

(2010). The origin of cultural differences in cognition: The social orientation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359301

66.

Villanueva-Moya

Herrera

M. C.

Sánchez-Hernández

M. D.

Expósito

(2022). #instacomparison: Social comparison and envy as correlates of exposure to Instagram and cyberbullying perpetration. Psychological Reports, 126(3), 1284–1304. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211067390

67.

Wang

Lilienfeld

S. O.

Rochat

(2019). Schadenfreude deconstructed and reconstructed: A tripartite motivational model. New Ideas in Psychology, 52(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.09.002

68.

Webster

S. W.

Glynn

A. N.

Motta

M. P.

(2024). Partisan schadenfreude and candidate cruelty. Political Psychology, 45(2), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12922

69.

Wei

Liu

(2020). Reactions to others’ misfortune on social media: Effects of homophily and publicness on schadenfreude, empathy, and perceived deservingness. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.002

70.

Weisel

Böhm

(2015). “Ingroup love” and “outgroup hate” in intergroup conflict between natural groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.008

71.

Balliet

Van Lange

P. A. M.

(2016). Reputation, gossip, and human cooperation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(6), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12255

72.

Balliet

Van Lange

P. A. M.

(2021). Reputation: A fundamental route to human cooperation. In Wilczynski

Brosnan

S. F.

(Eds.), Cooperation and conflict: The interaction of opposites in shaping social behavior (pp. 45–65). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671187.005

73.

Zhu

Harris

Zhang

Tsyganova

Zeng

(2023). The blue whale challenge from urban legend to real harm: Case study analyses of Chinese suicide attempters. Current Psychology, 42(18), 15295–15306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02793-w