The aim of the present study was to analyse the psychometric properties of the Trichotillomania Dimensional Scale (TTM-D) in Peruvian adults. A total of 507 adults (66.7% women) participated, completing a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Frequency of Suicidal Ideation Inventory (FSII), the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 (GAD-2). Structural validity was examined using confirmatory factor analysis within a covariance-based structural equation modelling framework, and item functioning was analysed using a two-parameter item response theory (IRT) model. The TTM-D demonstrated adequate content validity, a unidimensional structure (CFI = .99, TLI = .99, RMSEA = .06 [90% CI: .032, .104], SRMR = .01), and good reliability (ω = .94, H = .98). Moreover, significant associations were observed with depressive symptoms, generalised anxiety, and suicidal ideation. Item 3 showed the highest discrimination and information, and the scale proved accurate at high levels of trichotillomania. In conclusion, the TTM-D exhibits suitable psychometric properties supporting the validity and reliability of score interpretation in the assessment of trichotillomania. Its use is recommended both in professional practice and in research with the general adult population.
ArabatzoudisT.RehmI. C.NedeljkovicM.MouldingR. (2017). Emotion regulation in individuals with and without trichotillomania. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 12, 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2017.01.003
AtoM.López-GarcíaJ. J.BenaventeA. (2013). A classification system for research designs in psychology. Annals of Psychology, 29(3), 1038–1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
5.
BakerF. B.KimS. H. (2017). The basics of item response theory using R. Springer.
6.
BezerraA. P.MachadoM. O.MaesM.MarazzitiD.Nunes-NetoP. R.SolmiM.FirthJ.HusainI. M.BrunoniA. R.KurdyakP.SmithL.AlaviA.PiguetV.CarvalhoA. F. (2021). Trichotillomania—psychopathological correlates and associations with health-related quality of life in a large sample. CNS Spectrums, 26(3), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S109285292000111X
7.
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
8.
CaveroV.Diez-CansecoF.ToyamaM.Flórez SalcedoG.IpinceA.ArayaR.MirandaJ. J. (2018). Provision of mental health care within primary care in Peru: A qualitative study exploring the perspectives of psychologists, primary health care providers, and patients. Wellcome Open Research, 3, 9. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.13746.2
9.
ChangE. C.ChangO. D. (2016). Development of the frequency of suicidal ideation inventory: Evidence for the validity and reliability of a brief measure of suicidal ideation frequency in a college student population. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 40(4), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-016-9758-0
10.
CheyneJ. E.del Pozo de BolgerA.WoottonB. M. (2018). Reliability and validity of the trichotillomania dimensional scale (TTM-D). Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 19, 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2018.08.004
11.
ClarkC.AbdiP.LiK.TurkT.DytocM. (2025). Systematic review of psychodermatologic assessment tools: Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility. Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, 29(5), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/12034754241311267
CroweE.StaigerP. K.BoweS. J.RehmI.MouldingR.HerrickC.HallfordD. J. (2024). The association between trichotillomania symptoms and emotion regulation difficulties: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 346, 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.11.010
14.
DiefenbachG. J.Mouton-OdumS.StanleyM. A. (2002). Affective correlates of trichotillomania. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40(11), 1305–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00006-2
15.
DiefenbachG. J.TolinD. F.CrocettoJ.MaltbyN.HannanS. (2005). Assessment of trichotillomania: A psychometric evaluation of hair-pulling scales. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27(3), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-005-0633-7
16.
DuBoisM. C.FelerB. M.FlessnerC. A.FranklinM. E. (2025). Trichotillomania and its treatment: An updated review and recommendations. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 25, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2557395
17.
Franco-JimenezR. A.Nuñez-MagallanesA. (2022). Propiedades psicométricas del GAD-7, GAD-2 y GAD-Mini en universitarios peruanos. Propósitos y Representaciones, 10(1), e1437. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2022.v10n1.1437
GrantJ. E.CollinsM.ChesivoirE.ChamberlainS. R. (2023). Suicidal ideation and attempts in trichotillomania. Psychiatry Research, 325, 115245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115245
20.
GrantJ. E.DoughertyD. D.ChamberlainS. R. (2020). Prevalence, gender correlates, and co-morbidity of trichotillomania. Psychiatry Research, 288, 112948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112948
GrantJ. E.ReddenS. A.MedeirosG. C.OdlaugB. L.CurleyE. E.TavaresH.KeuthenN. J. (2017). Trichotillomania and its clinical relationship to depression and anxiety. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 21(4), 302–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2017.1314509
23.
GunnellK. E. (2020). Validity and reliability. In HackfortEn D.SchinkeR. (Eds.), The routledge international encyclopedia of sport and exercise psychology (pp. 632–645). Routledge.
24.
HilbigB. E.ThielmannI.BöhmR. (2022). Bending our ethics code: Avoidable deception and its justification in psycho-logical research. European Psychologist, 27(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000431
25.
HoughtonD. C.MaasJ.TwohigM. P.SaundersS. M.ComptonS. N.Neal-BarnettA. M.FranklinM. E.WoodsD. W. (2016). Comorbidity and quality of life in adults with hair pulling disorder. Psychiatry Research, 239, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.02.063
26.
Huaco AranguriA.Orduña CarpioR.Ortiz CastroC.Delgado GonzalesM.Haito ChávezY. (2022). Gastric trichobezoar: Case report and literature review. Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú, 42(3), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.47892/rgp.2022.423.1343
27.
Jordan MuiñosF. M. (2021). Valor de corte de los índices de ajuste en el análisis factorial confirmatorio. Psocial, 7(1), 1–5.
28.
KeuthenN. J.DoughertyD. D.FranklinM. E.BohneA.LohR.LevyJ.BealsA.MatthewsM.DeckersbachT. (2004). Quality of life and functional impairment in individuals with trichotillomania. The Journal of Applied Research, 4(2), 191–200.
29.
KeuthenN. J.O'SullivanR. L.RicciardiJ. N.SheraD.SavageC. R.BorgmannA. S.JenikeM. A.BaerL. (1995). The massachusetts general hospital (MGH) hairpulling scale: 1. Development and factor analyses. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 64(3-4), 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1159/000289003
30.
KlineR. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed). The Guilford Press.
31.
KroenkeK.SpitzerR. L.WilliamsJ. B. W. (2003). The patient health Questionnaire-2 validity of a two-item depression screener. Medical Care, 41(11), 1284–1292. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C
32.
KroenkeK.SpitzerR. L.WilliamsJ. B. W.MonahanP. O.LoweB. (2007). Anxiety disorders in primary care: Prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Annals of Internal Medicine, 146(5), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004
33.
LeBeauR. T.MischelE. R.SimpsonH. B.Mataix-ColsD.PhillipsK. A.SteinD. J.CraskeM. G. (2013). Preliminary assessment of obsessive–compulsive spectrum disorder scales for DSM-5. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 2(2), 114–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2013.01.005
34.
LiC. H. (2016). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000093
35.
Maydeu-OlivaresA.JoeH. (2014). Assessing approximate fit in categorical data analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49(4), 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.911075
36.
MonroeS.CaiL. (2015). Evaluating structural equation models for categorical outcomes: A new test statistic and a practical challenge of interpretation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(6), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1032398
37.
Moreno-AmadorB.PiquerasJ. A.Rodriguez-JimenezT.MarzoJ. C.Mataix-ColsD. (2018). Adaptation and validation of the dimensional DSM-5 obsessive-compulsive related disorder scales in adolescents: Preliminary data. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 19, 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2018.10.002
38.
PfadtJ. M.van den BerghD.MoshagenM. (2023). Classical and Bayesian uncertainty intervals for the reliability of multidimensional scales. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 30(3), 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2022.2124162
39.
PfadtJ. M.van den BerghD.SijtsmaK.MoshagenM.WagenmakersE. J. (2022). Bayesian estimation of single-test reliability coefficients. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 57(4), 620–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2021.1891855
RoebiantoA.SavitriS. I.AuliaI.SuciyanaA.MubarokahL. (2023). Content validity: Definition and procedure of content validation in psychological research. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 30(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM30.1.1
42.
SaccoM. A.GualtieriS.PrinciA.TardaL.TaralloA. P.CalannaL.LombardoS.CalafioreJ.GratteriS.AquilaI. (2024). Rapunzel syndrome: Clinical, diagnostic and forensic aspects in related deaths—A review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(23), 7464. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237464
43.
SijtsmaK.van der ArkA. L. (2017). A tutorial on how to do a mokken scale analysis on your test and questionnaire data. British Journal of Social Psychology, 70(1), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12078
44.
StembergerR. M.ThomasA. M.MansuetoC. S.CarterJ. G. (2000). Personal toll of trichotillomania: Behavioral and interpersonal sequelae. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 14(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0887-6185(99)00028-6
45.
StoverA. M.McLeodL. D.LangerM. M.ChenW. H.ReeveB. B. (2019). State of the psychometric methods: Patient-reported outcome measure development and refinement using item response theory. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 3(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-019-0130-5
46.
ThomsonH. A.FarhatL. C.OlfsonE.LevineJ. L. S.BlochM. H. (2022). Prevalence and gender distribution of trichotillomania: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 153, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.06.058
47.
Villarreal-ZegarraD.Barrera-BegazoJ.Otazú-AlfaroS.Mayo-PuchocN.Bazo-AlvarezJ. C.Huarcaya-VictoriaJ. (2023). Sensitivity and specificity of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9, PHQ-8, PHQ-2) and general anxiety disorder scale (GAD-7, GAD-2) for depression and anxiety diagnosis: A cross-sectional study in a Peruvian hospital population. BMJ Open, 13(9), e076193. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076193
