Marital adjustment can be conceptualized as a resource of the family system or a part of the regenerative powers of the family. It is important to investigate marital adjustment as it is a concept that deeply affects the quality of life. In this study, which attempts to explain marital adjustment, regression analysis was performed on the obtained results. The data were examined with correlation analysis and regression analysis. According to the study results, there was a strong positive correlation (r = .76) between marital adjustment and spousal self-efficacy among the predictor and dependent variables. Martial adjustment establishes a high level and significant relationship with spouse self-efficacy, resentment-avoidance, marital problem solving, gender, marriage duration, having children and the number of children, income level, education status and place of residence. All variables (spousal self-efficacy, resentment-avoidance, marital problem-solving skills, gender, duration of marriage, having children, number of children, income level, educational status, and place of residence) explain 75% of marital adjustment.
AndersonS. A.RussellC. S.SchummW. R. (1983). Perceived marital quality and family life-cycle categories: A further analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 45(1), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.2307/351301
3.
AnlıM. (2021). Evli bireylerde evlilik uyumu, yaşam doyumu ve kaygı düzeyi arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. [Unpublished Master Thesis]. İstanbul Kent Üniversitesi.
4.
BalakrishnanT. R.RaoK. V.Lapierre-AdamcykE.KrotkiK. (1987). A hazard model analysis of the covariates of marriage dissolution in Canada. Demography, 24(3), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.2307/2061305
BaughC. W.AveryA. V.Sheets-HaworthK. L. (1982). Marital Problem-Solving Scale: A measure to assess relationship conflict negotiation ability.Family Therapy, 9(1), 43–43.
8.
BilgiçA. (2025). Serebral palsili ve sağlıklı çocukların ebeveynlerinde evlilik uyumu ve anne babalık görevlerinde öz yeterlilik. [Unpublished Master Thesis]. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi.
9.
BoothA.JohnsonD. R.WhteL. K.EdwardsJ. N. (1984). Women, outside employment, and marital instability. American Journal of Sociology, 90(3), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1086/228117
10.
BradburyT. N.FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 964–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00964.x
11.
BusbyD. M.ChristensenC.CraneD. R.LarsonJ. H. (1995). A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21(3), 289–308.
12.
CapraraG. V.RegaliaC.ScabiniE.BarbaranelliC.BanduraA. (2004). Assessment of filial, parental, marital, and collective family efficacy beliefs. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20(4), 247–261.
13.
CareyM. P.SpectorI. P.LantingaL. J.KraussD. J. (1993). Reliability of the dyadic adjusment scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 238–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.238
14.
CasasJ. M.OrtizS. (1985). Exploring the applicability of the dyadic adjustment scale for assessing level of marital adjustment with Mexican Americans. Journal of Marriage and Family, 47(4), 1023-1027. https://doi.org/10.2307/352346
15.
DemirayÖ. (2006). Evlilikte uyumun demografik özelliklere göre İncelenmesi. [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Dicle Üniversitesi.
16.
DenizM. E.UzunG.KurtuluşH. Y. (2019). Evlilikte suçu affetme ve yüklemenin evlilik doyumu üzerindeki yordayıcı etkisi. Elementary Education Online, 18(2), 852–861. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.562065
17.
DiBlasioF. A.ProctorJ. H. (1993). Therapists and the clinical use of forgiveness. American Journal of Family Therapy, 21(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926189308250915
18.
EllisA. (1986). Rational-emotive therapy applied to relationship therapy. Journal of Rational-Emotive Therapy, 4(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073477
19.
Erdinçİ. (2018). Evli çiftlerde, evlilik uyumu, cinsel yaşam doyumu ve yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. [Unpublished Master Thesis]. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi.
20.
EricksonG. S. (2017). Causal research design. In In new methods of market research and analysis (pp. 78–105). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786432698.00010
21.
ErkanZ. (2015). Adaptation of the Marital Offence-Specific Forgiveness Scale for use in a Turkish cultural context. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 43(7), 1057–1070.
22.
FinchamF. D. (2000). The kiss of the porcupines: From attributing responsibility to forgiving. Personal Relationships, 7(2000), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073477
23.
FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. H. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: Implications for psychological aggression and constructive communication. Personal Relationships, 9(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00016
24.
FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. H.DavilaJ. (2004). Forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.18.1.72
25.
FinchamF. D.PaleariG.RegaliaC. (2002). Forgiveness in marriage: The role of relationship quality, attributions and empathy. Personal Relationships, 9(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00002
FitzpatrickM. A.BestP. (1979). Dyadic adjustment in relational types: Consensus, cohesion, affectional expression, and satisfaction in enduring relatonships. Communication Monographs, 46(3), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757909376004
28.
GillD. S.ChristensenA.FinchamF. D. (1999). Predicting marital satisfaction from behavior: Do all roads really lead to rome?Personal Relationships, 6(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1999.tb00198.x
29.
GönültaşO.BayarY. (2024). The mediator role of resilience and rumination in the relationship between forgiveness and marital adjustment. Research on Education and Psychology, 8(1), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.54535/rep.1478687
GottmanJ. M. (1988). The roles of conflict engagement, escalation and avoidance in marital interaction: A longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.1.6
32.
GottmanJ. M.KrokoffL. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.57.1.47
33.
GrahamJ. M.LiuY. J.JeziorskiJ. L. (2006). The dyadic adjustment scale: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(3), 701–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00284.x
34.
GündoğduA. (2007). Relationship between self-construals and marital quality [Master'sThesis]. Middle East Technical University.
35.
HünlerO. S. (2002). The effects of religiousness on marital satisfaction and the mediator role of perceived marital problem solving abilities between religiousness and marital satisfaction relationship. [Master's Thesis]. Middle East Technical University.
36.
HünlerO. S.GençözT. (2003). Submissive behaviours and marital satisfaction relation: Mediator role of perceived marital problem solving. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 18(51), 99–110.
37.
KaradağŞ. (2015). Evlilik uyumu ilişkisinde aile içi iletişimin rolü: Konya örneği. [Unpublished Master Thesis].Selçuk University.
38.
KayaA. G.BuğaA. (2021). Anne babaların ebeveyn davranışlarının ve evlilik doyumlarının incelenmesi. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 21(51), 371–410. https://doi.org/10.21560/spcd.vi.645465
LauerR. H.LauerJ. C. (1997) Marriage & family: The quest for intimacy (203-223, pp. 246–266): Mc Graw Hill.
41.
LaveeY.McCubbinH. I.OlsonD. H. (1987). The effect of stressful life events and transitions on family functioning and well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 49(4), 857–873. https://doi.org/10.2307/351979
42.
MalkoçG. (2018). Evli ve çocuk sahibi çiftlerin evlilik uyumu, evlilik çatışması, yakın ilişki düzeyleri ve yalnızlık düzeylerinin çocuk yetiştirme tutumları ile Olan ilişkilerinin incelenmesi. [Unpublished Master Thesis]. İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi.
McCulloughM. E.WorthingtonE. L.RachalK. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.321
45.
McDonaldJ. E.OlsonJ. R.LanningA. H.GoddardH. W.MarshallJ. P. (2017). Effects of religiosity, forgiveness, and spousal empathy on marital adjustment. Marriage & Family Review, 54(4), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2017.1403992
46.
MichelA. (1970). Wife’s satisfaction with a husband’s understanding in Parisian Urban Families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 32(3), 351–359. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23027804.
OsmaŞ. (2025). 6-18 yaş çocuğu Olan annelerin eşleri ile çift uyumu ve ebeveyn yetkinliği arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Ordu Üniversitesi.
49.
ÖzdaşS.AkcanbaşM. (2025). Examining marital adjustment among married individuals: The case of Diyarbakır province. The Journal of Family Psychological Counseling, 8(2), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.58434/apdad.1703154
50.
ÖzerE. M. (1995). The impact of childcare responsibility and self-efficacy on the psychological health of working mothers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb0007
51.
Özmen-SüataçA. (2010). Evlilik uyumunun kişilerarası tarz ve öfke açısından araştırılması. [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Ege Üniversitesi.
52.
PaleariF. G.RegaliaC.FinchamF. D. (2009). Measuring offence-specific forgiveness in marriage: the Marital Offence-Specific Forgiveness Scale (MOFS). Psychological Assessment, 21(2), 194.
53.
ParkerM. L.TamblingR. B.CampbellK. (2013). Dyadic adjustment and depressive symptoms: The mediating role of attachment. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 21(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.0.4.153/1066480712456674
54.
SardoğanM. E.KarahanT. F. (2005). Evli bireylere yönelik bir insan ilişkileri beceri eğitimi programının evli bireylerin evlilik uyum düzeylerine etkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000117
55.
SconzaniJ. (1995). Contemporary families and relationship: Reinventing responsibilities. New York: McGrow-Hill.
56.
ŞenE.BulutS.ŞirinA. (2014). Primer infertil çiftlerde eşler arası uyumun incelenmesi. Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Dergisi, 22(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.17672/fnhd.08069
ŞenerA. (2002). Ailede eşler arasında uyuma etki eden faktörlerin araştırılması. [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Hacettepe University.
60.
SolomonZ.DekelR.ZerachG. (2009). Posttraumatic stress disorder and marital adjustment: The mediating role of forgiveness. Family Process, 48(4), 546–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01301.x
TorrB. M. (2011). The changing relationship between education and marriage in the United States. 1940–2000. Journal of Family History, 36(4), 483–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363199011416760
63.
ÜçüncüH. (2023). Kadınlarda premenstrual sendrom ile cinsel işlev ve çift uyumu ilişkisinin incelenmesi. [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Ordu Üniversitesi.
64.
UşaklıN. (2010). Evli Bireylerin evliliğe uyumunda karşılaştığı sorunlar ve eğitim ihtiyaçları. [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Gazi Üniversitesi.
65.
Vural BatikM.KalkanM. (2017). Evlilikte algılanan sorun çözme becerileri ve evlilik doyumu. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(5), 2630–2646. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.513869
WilsonS. M.LarsonJ. H.McCullochB. J.StoneK. L. (1997). Dyadic adjustment: An ecosystemıc examınatıon. American Journal of Family Therapy, 25(4), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926189708251074
68.
WoodmanT. (1991). The role of forgiveness in marital adjustment. [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Fuller Graduate School of Psychology.
69.
Yaman AkpınarT.Altunsu SönmezÖ. (2021). Evlilikte suçu affetme ve evlilik uyumu ilişkisi. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 9(Toplum & Siyaset), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.772923
70.
Yılmaz BingölT.KalkanM. (2018). Aile Yeterlik Ölçekleri’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması, geçerlik ve güvenirliği. FSM İlmî Araştırmalar İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Dergisi, 12, 141–169.
71.
YüceolG. P. (2016). Ebeveynliğin belirleyicileri modeli temelinde evlilik uyumu, algılanan sosyal destek, çalışma durumu, değerler ve anne çocuk ilişkisi. [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
72.
ZhangC.LiangY. (2023). The impact of education level on marital satisfaction: Evidence from China. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 7(1), 100–487.
