This study examines the effects of a short-term workcation on psychological and physiological responses. A group of corporate executives (n = 20) volunteered to participate in a three-day workcation program (WG) along with a control group (n = 20) working on daily jobs at usual office (CG). Psychological responses were obtained three times, namely in the week before the workcation, at the end of the workcation day, and one week after the workcation. The heart rate (HR) was acquired on the first day of the workcation (not on a working day) and the end of next day after remote work. The HR variabilities of the LF/HF ratio and HF values were used to evaluate sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous activities. The results were as follows. The workcation increased positive feelings such as liveliness (WG: 15.8 vs. CG: 11.9, p < .05) and well-being (WG: 15.9 vs. CG: 9.6, p < .05) after the workcation; notably, the heightened sense of liveliness of the WG persisted even after one week (end of workcation: 14.5 vs. after one week: 11.6, p < .05). Furthermore, the workcation appeared to cause relief from the work-related stress that could arise from taking a vacation. The HR (bpm) of the WG increased more than that of the CG after the end of the workcation (WG: 76.1 vs. CG: 67.1, p < .05) and the LF/HF ratio of the WG increased from day off to after work (day off: 2.0 vs. after work: 5.4, p <.05), suggesting that sympathetic activities were heightened and might have increased the performance of work-related activities on the workcation program. These findings indicate that a workcation can produce positive effects on psychological and physiological responses.
AndreassiJ. L. (1966). Some physiological correlates of verbal learning task difficulty. Psychonomic Science, 6(2), 69–70. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03327961
2.
AraiN.UmeharaM.IwakiK.IwasakiY. (2022). Effects of short-term workcation on psychological indices of workers in metropolitan: A case work at Okunoto area. Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, 48(1), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.7211/jjsrt.48.129
3.
CharnessG.GneezyU.KuhnM. A. (2012). Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009
4.
De BloomJ.GeurtsS. A.TarisT. W.SonnentagS.de WeerthC.KompierM. A. (2010). Effects of vacation from work on health and well-being: Lots of fun, quickly gone. Work & Stress, 24(2), 196–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2010.493385
5.
De BloomJ.KompierM.GeurtsS.De WeerthC.TarisT.SonnentagS. (2009). Do we recover from vacation? Meta-Analysis of vacation effects on health and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health, 51(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.K8004
6.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B. (2011). The job demands-resources model: Challenges for future research. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v37i2.974
7.
FarbN.DaubenmierJ.PriceC. J.GardT.KerrC.DunnB. D.KleinA. C.PaulusM. P.MehlingW. E. (2015). Interoception, contemplative practice, and health. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 763. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00763
8.
FritzC.SonnentagS. (2006). Recovery, well-being, and performance-related outcomes: The role of workload and vacation experiences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 936–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.936
9.
GarfinkelS. N.CritchleyH. D.PollatosO. (2017). The interoceptive system: Implications for cognition, emotion, and health. In CacioppoT.TassinaryL. G.BerntsonG. G. (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (4th ed., pp. 427–443). Cambridge University Press.
10.
GianarosP. J.WagerT. D. (2015). Brain-body pathways linking psychological stress and physical health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415581476
11.
HansenA. L.JohnsenB. H.ThayerJ. F. (2003). Vagal influence on working memory and attention. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 48(3), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(03)00073-4
12.
ImaiA.ShiraiM.HoritaY.HayashiY.IshibashiT.UchidaH. (2022). Effects of workcation on psychological and physiological responses. Paper book of the 88th annual congress of the Japan Association ofApplied Psychology (JAAP), 16-16. (In Japanese.).
13.
IwaasaT.EbaraT.MizunoM.YoshikawaT. (2022). Effects of sports workcation on workers’ health and psychosocial outcomes. Japanese Journal of Ergonomics, 58(4), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.5100/jje.58.174
KreinerG. E. (2006). Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: A person–environment fit perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.386
17.
KurniasariM. I.IsbahM. F.AzcaM. N. (2022). The emerging workcation trend in Indonesia: A preliminary study on the demographic profiles, motivations, and experiences of workcationers. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 21(1), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.21.1.2022.75-97
18.
LarinierN.VuillermeN.JadaudA.MalherbeS.GiraudE.BalaguierR. (2024). Acute effects of a warm-up intervention on pain, productivity, physical capacities and psychological perceptions among vineyard workers: A cluster randomized trial. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 34(1), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-023-10134-2
19.
LeeJ.ShinH.KangJ. (2024). Investigating the managerial effects of workcations (work (plus) vacations) on digital nomad employees: Workcation satisfaction, work engagement, innovation behavior, intention to stay, and revisit intention. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 59, 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2024.05.003
20.
LewisD.RayW. J.WilkinsonM. O.RickettsR. (1984). Self-report and heart rate responses to a stressful task. International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, 2(1), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8760(84)90069-2
21.
LiM.KimN. (2024). Exploring multisensory home office design in virtual reality: Effects on task performance, heart rate, and emotion. Acta Psychologica, 250, 104536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104536
22.
MalmoR. B. (1965). Physiological gradients and behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 64(4), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022288
23.
McDermottK.NashP.BoyingtonA.PlanellL.P.JoeS.StreifelK.NicholsG.LucasB.SpenceA.CampisiJ. (2022). Effects of olfactory stimulus on group performance and individual stress responses in university students. Physiology & Behavior, 254, 113905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113905
24.
MiyamotoM.OgataK. (2023). An empirical study on effects of workcation on employee mental condition: Innovation, mental health, productivity, and engagement as indicators of. Reports of the City Planning Institute of Japan, 22(2), 182–187. https://doi.org/10.11361/reportscpij.22.2_182
25.
NagataH. (2021). Workcation (work+vacation): “New way of working” to maximize creativity and productivity. Kadokawa.
26.
NakajimaM.ChenW. J.FlemingR. (2017). Effects of unrecognized physiological residual arousal on emotional experience. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 22(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/jabr.12103
NegoroH.KobayashiR. (2022). A workcation improves cardiac parasympathetic function during sleep to decrease arterial stiffness in workers. Healthcare, 10(10), 2037. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10102037
30.
OgataK.MiyamotoM. (2023). An empirical study on the economic ripple effects of workcation. Reports of the City Planning Institute of Japan, 22(2), 198–202. https://doi.org/10.11361/reportscpij.22.2_198
31.
ParkH.KimJ.JoS.KimH.JoY.KimS.YooI. (2022). Measuring emotional variables in occupational performance: A scoping review. Work, 72(4), 1195–1203. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-205162
RosenthalR. (1976). Experimenter effects in behavioral research (2nd ed.). Wiley.
34.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
35.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
36.
SakanoY.FukuiT.KumanoH.HorieH.KawaharaK.YamanotoH.NomuraS.SuematsuH. (1994). Development and validation of a new mood inventory. Shinshin Igaku, 34, 629–636. https://doi.org/10.15064/jjpm.34.8_629
37.
ShinH.LeeJ.KimN. (2024). Workcation (workation) travel experiences, satisfaction and revisit intentions: Focusing on conceptualization, scale development, and nomological network. Journal of Travel Research, 63(5), 1150–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231188717
TanakaA.IshiyamaN. (2020). Consideration of issues for launch and expansion of “Japanese workcation system”: Definition, classification, and impact on stakeholders. JAFIT (Japan Foundation for International Tourism International) Tourism Review, 27, 113–122. https://doi.org/10.24526/jafit.27.0_113
TerasakiM.KishimotoY.KogaA. (1992). Construction of a multiple mood scale. Shinrigaku Kenkyu: Japanese Journal of Psychology, 62(6), 350–356. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.62.350
42.
ThayerJ. F.LaneR. D. (2009). Claude Bernard and the heart-brain connection: Further elaboration of a model of neurovisceral integration. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(2), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.004
TyraA. T.FergusT. A.GintyA. T. (2024). Emotion suppression and acute physiological responses to stress in healthy populations: A quantitative review of experimental and correlational investigations. Health Psychology Review, 18(2), 396–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2023.2251559
45.
Van BovenL.AshworthL. (2007). Looking forward, looking back: Anticipation is more evocative than retrospection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(2), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.289
46.
VollK.GaugerF.PfnürA. (2023). Work from anywhere: Traditional workation, coworkation and workation retreats: A conceptual review. World Leisure Journal, 65(2), 150–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2022.2134199
47.
WhiteR. A. (1977). The influence of the experimenter motivation, attitudes and methods of handling subjects in psi test results. In WolmanB. B. (Ed.), Handbook of parapsychology (pp. 273–304). Van Nostrand Reinhold.
48.
YoshidaT. (2021). How has workcation evolved in Japan?Annals of Business Administrative Science, 20(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.7880/abas.0210112a
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
