Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
All Resources Lead to Rome: A Multi-Study Investigation on the Complementary Association of Core Self-Evaluations and Emotional Intelligence on Well-Being
This multi-study investigation examined what magnitude of personal resources people need to flourish in their personal life and at work. We specifically looked at the interplay between emotional intelligence (EI) and core self-evaluations (CSE) in relation to flourishing, happiness, and work engagement. Guided by job demands-resources theory, this investigation was conducted through two separate studies (Ns1 = 391; Ns2 = 703) using path analysis with Spanish employees. Study 1 revealed that EI moderated the positive relationship between CSE and flourishing and work engagement so that this relationship was weaker among employees high (vs. low) in EI. Study 2 replicated this pattern for the relationships with happiness and work engagement. Facet-level analyses revealed that use of emotions was driving the moderation on flourishing in Study 1, whereas other-emotion appraisal was driving the moderation on work engagement in Study 2. Overall, these findings suggest that individuals low in CSE might benefit from higher levels of EI to enhance their flourishing. Implications for improving well-being through the development of personal resources are discussed.
AnastasiouS.BeliosE. (2020). Effect of age on job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion of primary school teachers in Greece. European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education, 10(2), 644–655. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10020047
2.
AshkanasyN. M.DausC. S. (2005). Rumors of the death of emotional intelligence in organizational behavior are vastly exaggerated. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.320
3.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.Sanz-VergelA. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933
4.
BeléndezM.GómezA.LópezS.TopaG. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Core Self-Evaluations Scale (CSES-SP). Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 195–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.034
BippT.KleingeldA.EbertT. (2019). Core self-evaluations as a personal resource at work for motivation and health. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109556
7.
BrenninkmeijerV.DemeroutiE.le BlancP. M.van EmmerikI. J. H. (2010). Regulatory focus at work: The moderating role of regulatory focus in the job demands-resources model. Career Development International, 15(7), 708–728. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431011094096
8.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.
9.
ChangC. H.FerrisD. L.JohnsonR. E.RosenC. C.TanJ. A. (2012). Core self-evaluations: A review and evaluation of the literature. Journal of Management, 38(1), 81–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311419661
10.
ChangE. C.YuE. A.HirschJ. K. (2013). On the confluence of optimism and hope on depressive symptoms in primary care patients: Does doubling up on bonum futurun proffer any added benefits?The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(5), 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.818163
11.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
CôtéS.MinersC. T. H. (2006). Emotional intelligence, cognitive intelligence, and job performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.1.1
14.
DawsonJ. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
15.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B. (2022). Job demands-resources theory in times of crises: New propositions. Organizational Psychology Review, 13(3), 209–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221135022
16.
De StasioS.FiorilliC.BeneveneP.BoldriniF.RagniB.PepeA.BriegasJ. J. M. (2019). Subjective happiness and compassion are enough to increase teachers’ work engagement?Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2268. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02268
17.
DienerE.WirtzD.TovW.Kim-PrietoC.ChoiD.OishiS.Biswas-DienerR. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
18.
ExtremeraN.Fernández-BerrocalP. (2014). The Subjective Happiness Scale: Translation and preliminary psychometric evaluation of a Spanish version. Social Indicators Research, 119(1), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0497-2
19.
ExtremeraN.ReyL.Sánchez-ÁlvarezN. (2019). Validation of the Spanish version of Wong Law emotional intelligence scale (WLEIS-S). Psicothema, 31(1), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.147
20.
ExtremeraN.Sánchez-GarcíaM.DuránM. A.ReyL. (2012). Examining the psychometric properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale in two Spanish multi-occupational samples. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(1), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2012.00583.x
21.
FinneyS. J.DiStefanoC. (2006). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation models. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Information Age Publishing.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.
24.
HentrichS.ZimberA.Sosnowsky-WaschekN.GregersenS.PetermannF. (2017). The role of core self-evaluations in explaining depression and work engagement among managers. Current Psychology, 36(3), 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9439-x
25.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
KeyesC. L. M. (2007). Promoting and protecting mental health as flourishing: A complementary strategy for improving national mental health. American Psychologist, 62(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.95
28.
KlineR. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
29.
KotsouI.MikolajczakM.HeerenA.GrégoireJ.LeysC. (2019). Improving emotional intelligence: A systematic review of existing work and future challenges. Emotion Review, 11(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917735902
30.
KurtzJ. L.LyubomkskyS. (2008). Toward a durable happiness. In LopezS. J. (Ed.), Positive psychology: Exploring the best in people, vol. 4. Pursuing human flourishing (pp. 21–36). Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.
LyubomirskyS.KingL.DienerE. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
33.
LyubomirskyS.LepperH. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006824100041
MayerJ. D.CarusoD. R.SaloveyP. (2016). The ability model of emotional intelligence: Principles and updates. Emotion Review, 8(4), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916639667
36.
MazzettiG.RobledoE.VignoliM.TopaG.GuglielmiD.SchaufeliW. B. (2023). Work engagement: A meta-analysis using the job demands-resources model. Psychological Reports, 126(3), 1069–1107. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211051988
37.
Mérida-LópezS.ExtremeraN.Sánchez-ÁlvarezN. (2020). The interactive effects of personal resources on teachers’ work engagement and withdrawal intentions: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(7), 2170. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072170
38.
MiaoC.HumphreyR. H.QianS. (2017). A meta-analysis of emotional intelligence and work attitudes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90(2), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12167
39.
MoncadaS.UtzetM.MolineroE.LlorensC.MorenoN.GaltésA.NavarroA. (2014). The Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) in Spain-A tool for psychosocial risk assessment at the workplace. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 57(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22238
40.
NgT. W.FeldmanD. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 392–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392
41.
PejtersenJ. H.KristensenT. S.BorgV.BjornerJ. B. (2010). The second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38(3), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494809349858
42.
PekaarK. A.BakkerA. B.van der LindenD.BornM. P. (2020). The impact of emotional intelligence on daily work life. In BurkeR.PignataS. (Eds.), Handbook of research on stress and well-being in the public sector (pp. 122–136). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788970358
43.
PekaarK. A.van der LindenD.BakkerA. B.BornM. P. (2017). Emotional intelligence and job performance: The role of enactment and focus on others’ emotions. Human Performance, 30(2–3), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2017.1332630
44.
Peláez-FernándezM. A.ReyL.ExtremeraN. (2019). Psychological distress among the unemployed: Do core self-evaluations and emotional intelligence help to minimize the psychological costs of unemployment?Journal of Affective Disorders, 256, 627–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.042
45.
PerssonR.ÖsterbergK.GardeA. H.HansenÅ. M.KarlsonB. (2021). Work-life balance, job demands and control, and exhaustion in a sample of Swedish women and men. BMC Public Health, 21, 1036. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10317-7
46.
Ramírez-MaestreC.CorreaM.RivasT.López-MartínezA. E.Serrano-IbáñezE. R.EsteveR. (2017). Psychometric characteristics of the Flourishing Scale-Spanish Version (FS-SV). The factorial structure in two samples: Students and patients with chronic pain. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.035
47.
Sánchez-ÁlvarezN.ExtremeraN.Fernández-BerrocalP. (2016). The relation between emotional intelligence and subjective well-being: A meta-analytic investigation. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(3), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1058968
48.
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In von EyeA.CloggC. (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Sage.
49.
SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.248
50.
SchaufeliW. B.SalanovaM.González-RomáV.BakkerA. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
51.
SeisdedosN. (1997). Inventario “Burnout” de Maslach. TEA Ediciones.
52.
SpectorP. E. (2019). Do not cross me: Optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8
53.
SunP.WangS.KongF. (2014). Core self-evaluations as mediator and moderator of the relationship between emotional intelligence and life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 118(1), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0413-9
54.
TimsM.AkkermansJ. (2017). Core self-evaluations and work engagement: Testing a perception, action, and development path. PLoS One, 12(8), Article e0182745. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182745
55.
UllmanJ. B. (2006). Structural equation modeling. In TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (5th ed., pp. 653–771). Allyn & Bacon.
56.
WheelerA. R.ShanineK. K.LeonM. R.WhitmanM. V. (2014). Student-recruited samples in organizational research: A review, analysis, and guidelines for future research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12042
57.
WongC.-S.LawK. S. (2002). The effects of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(3), 243–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00099-1
58.
ZeidnerM.MatthewsG.RobertsR. D. (2012). The emotional intelligence, health, and well-being nexus: What have we learned and what have we missed?Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being, 4(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01062.x
