The pervasive use of social media exposes individuals to negative experiences, including social media bashing, which profoundly impacts mental health, yet there is a conspicuous lack of a standardized scale to assess these experiences. This study assessed the psychometric properties of the Social Media Bashing Assessment Scale (SM-BASH). A total of 978 college students from the Philippines participated in the study. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to determine the underlying structure of the SM-BASH, followed by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to validate the model. The scale’s reliability was examined using Cronbach’s alpha and inter-item/inter-total correlation, while its validity was examined through content and criterion validity tests. The EFA and CFA revealed a two-factor structure model, which explained 70.57% of the total variance, comprising ‘Explicit Social Media Bashing’ and ‘Implicit Social Media Bashing’. The scale demonstrated excellent criterion validity and high internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha of .92. The 10-item SM-BASH is a valid and reliable tool for quantifying negative encounters on social media platforms, particularly among student populations. Its strong psychometric properties make it appropriate for use in research and potentially in clinical settings to assess and address the impacts of social media bashing on individuals’ well-being.
AbarnaS.SheebaJ. I.JayasrilakshmiS.DevaneyanS. P. (2022). Identification of cyber harassment and intention of target users on social media platforms. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 115(1), Article 105283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105283
2.
BettmannJ. E.AnstadtG.CasselmanB.GaneshK. (2021). Young adult depression and anxiety linked to social media use: Assessment and treatment. Clinical Social Work Journal, 49(3), 368–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-020-00752-1
3.
BoatengG. O.NeilandsT. B.FrongilloE. A.Melgar-QuiñonezH. R.YoungS. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
4.
BongonJ. A.BurgosT. M. B.LeonesM. N. N. S.TanyagR. A. D. (2020). Perspectives of victims of bashing in social media. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, 4(1), 51.
5.
CameronR. (2009). A sequential mixed model research design: Design, analytical and display issues. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(2), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.3.2.140
6.
CasuG.GremigniP. (2019). Is a single-item measure of self-rated mental health useful from a clinimetric perspective?Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 88(3), 177–178. https://doi.org/10.1159/000497373
7.
ÇetinB.YamanE.PekerA. (2011). Cyber victim and bullying scale: A study of validity and reliability. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2261–2271.
8.
ChiouW. B.LeeC. C.LiaoD. C. (2015). Facebook effects on social distress: Priming with online social networking thoughts can alter the perceived distress due to social exclusion. Computers in Human Behavior, 49(1), 230–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.064
9.
CohenS.KamarckT.MermelsteinR. (1994). Perceived stress scale. Measuring Stress: A Guide for Health and Social Scientists, 10(2), 1–2.
10.
CovertJ. M.StefanoneM. A. (2020). Does rejection still hurt? Examining the effects of network attention and exposure to online social exclusion. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318795128
11.
DeVellisR. F. (2006). Classical test theory. Medical Care, 44(11), S50–S59.
12.
FestingerL. (1957). Social comparison theory. Selective Exposure Theory, 16(401), 3.
13.
FlettG. L.BesserA.HewittP. L. (2014). Perfectionism and interpersonal orientations in depression: An analysis of validation seeking and rejection sensitivity in a community sample of young adults. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 77(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1521/psyc.2014.77.1.67
14.
GaskinJ.LimJ. (2016). Model fit measures. Gaskination’s StatWiki, 37(3), 814–822.
15.
GiumettiG. W.KowalskiR. M. (2022). Cyberbullying via social media and well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45(1), Article 101314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101314
16.
HealeR.TwycrossA. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(3), 66–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129
17.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424–453. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989x.3.4.424
18.
KaiserH. F. (1974). An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.
19.
KeumB. T.WangY. W.CallawayJ.AbebeI.CruzT.O’ConnorS. (2023). Benefits and harms of social media use: A latent profile analysis of emerging adults. Current Psychology, 42(27), 23506–23518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03473-5
20.
KolharM.KaziR. N. A.AlameenA. (2021). Effect of social media use on learning, social interactions, and sleep duration among university students. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28(4), 2216–2222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.01.010
21.
LamL. T.LiY. (2013). The validation of the E-Victimisation Scale (E-VS) and the E-Bullying Scale (E-BS) for adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 3–7.
22.
LuttrellR.WallaceA. A. (2021). Social media and society: An introduction to the mass media landscape. Rowman & Littlefield.
23.
MeninD.GuariniA.MameliC.SkrzypiecG.BrighiA. (2021). Was that (cyber) bullying? Investigating the operational definitions of bullying and cyberbullying from adolescents’ perspective. International journal of clinical and health psychology, 21(2), Article 100221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2021.100221
24.
OuvreinG.VandeboschH.De BackerC. J. (2020). Online celebrity bashing: Purely relaxation or stressful confrontation? An experimental study on the effects of exposure to online celebrity bashing on the emotional responses and physiological arousal among adolescent bystanders. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(9), 588–594. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0642
25.
OuvreinG.VandeboschH.De BackerC. J. (2024). Situational and personal determinants of adolescents’ attitudes toward online celebrity bashing. Psychology of Popular Media, 13(1), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000451
26.
PavotW.DienerE. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701756946
PolitD.BeckC. (2018). Nursing Reasearch: Generation and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. (9th ed.). Syndney, NSM: Wolters Kluwer.
29.
RazaS. A.QaziW.UmerB.KhanK. A. (2020). Influence of social networking sites on life satisfaction among university students: A mediating role of social benefit and social overload. Health Education, 120(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/he-07-2019-0034
30.
SchmittN (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 350–353.
31.
ShenY.MengF.XuH.LiX.ZhangY.HuangC.LuoX.ZhangX. Y.ZhangX. Y. (2020). Internet addiction among college students in a Chinese population: Prevalence, correlates, and its relationship with suicide attempts. Depression and Anxiety, 37(8), 812–821. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.23036
32.
ShiJ.MoX.SunZ. (2012). Content validity index in scale development. Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban= Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences, 37(2), 152–155. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007
33.
SmithD.LeonisT.AnandavalliS. (2021). Belonging and loneliness in cyberspace: Impacts of social media on adolescents’ well-being. Australian Journal of Psychology, 73(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1898914
SteinsbekkS.NesiJ.WichstrømL. (2023). Social media behaviors and symptoms of anxiety and depression. A four-wave cohort study from age 10–16 years. Computers in Human Behavior, 147(1), Article 107859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107859
36.
StevensF.NurseJ. R.AriefB. (2021). Cyber stalking, cyber harassment, and adult mental health: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(6), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0253
37.
StewartR. W.DrescherC. F.MaackD. J.EbesutaniC.YoungJ. (2014). The development and psychometric investigation of the Cyberbullying Scale. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(12), 2218–2238.
SulerJ. (2005). The online disinhibition effect. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 2(2), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/aps.42
40.
SulsJ.WillsT. A. (Eds.), (2024). Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research. Taylor & Francis.
41.
ThomasK.AkhaweD.BaileyM.BonehD.BurszteinE.ConsolvoS.StringhiniG. (2021). Sok: Hate, harassment, and the changing landscape of online abuse. In 2021 IEEE symposium on security and privacy (SP) (pp. 247–267). IEEE.
42.
ThomasL.OrmeE.KerriganF. (2020). Student loneliness: The role of social media through life transitions. Computers & Education, 146(1), Article 103754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103754
43.
TopcuÇ.Erdur-BakerÖ (2010). The revised cyber bullying inventory (RCBI): Validity and reliability studies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 660–664.
44.
Valenzuela-GarcíaN.Maldonado-GuzmánD. J.García-PérezA.Del-RealC. (2023). Too lucky to be a victim? An exploratory study of online harassment and hate messages faced by social media influencers. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 29(3), 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-023-09542-0
45.
ValkenburgP. M.BeyensI.MeierA.Vanden AbeeleM. M. P. (2022). Advancing our understanding of the associations between social media use and well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 47, Article 101357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101357
46.
ValkenburgP. M.van DrielI. I.BeyensI. (2022). The associations of active and passive social media use with well-being: A critical scoping review. New Media & Society, 24(2), 530–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211065425
47.
WhelanE.IslamA. N.BrooksS. (2020). Applying the SOBC paradigm to explain how social media overload affects academic performance. Computers & Education, 143(1), Article 103692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103692
48.
WongH. Y.MoH. Y.PotenzaM. N.ChanM. N. M.LauW. M.ChuiT. K.PakpourA. H.LinC. Y.LinC. Y. (2020). Relationships between severity of internet gaming disorder, severity of problematic social media use, sleep quality and psychological distress. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 1879. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061879
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
