Self-appraisals in relation to internalized standards are fundamental constructs in clinical and evolutionary models of Social Anxiety (SA). Empirical evidence has consistently shown that socially anxious individuals tend to engage in upward social comparisons and aim to adjust their social standing accordingly. However, the consequences of perceiving oneself as inferior to others within social contexts remain under-explored. To this end, a sample of N = 166 college students participated as respondents in an iterated, non-anonymous online Ultimatum Game (UG) against two familiar classmates: a fair allocator and a highly unfair allocator. Participants were informed that their identities would be disclosed to their assigned co-players. In reality, however, all participants played against a computer-simulated opponent. Our findings both replicate and extend previous research by showing that individuals with elevated social anxiety tend to exhibit vindictive behavior in response to unfair monetary UG splits (i.e., costly punishment) compared to their less anxious peers, even without the safeguarding of anonymity. Overall, our data lend empirical support to Social Rank theories of social anxiety and underscore the role of (upward) social comparison as a partial mediator explaining behavioral outcomes (i.e., vindictive behavior) in SA. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed.
AldenL. E.PhillipsN. (1990). An interpersonal analysis of social anxiety and depression. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14(5), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01172970
AllanS.GilbertP. (1995). A social comparison scale: Psychometric properties and relationship to psychopathology. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(3), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00086-L
4.
AlnaesR.TorgersenS. (1988). Major depression, anxiety disorders and mixed conditions Childhood and precipitating events. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 78(5), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-0447.1988.TB06397.X
5.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). APA.
6.
BakerS. L.HeinrichsN.KimH. J.HofmannS. G. (2002). The liebowitz social anxiety scale as a self-report instrument: A preliminary psychometric analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40(6), 701–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00060-2
7.
BicăA.CrețuR. Z. (2022). The carrot and the stick: How guilt and shame facilitate reciprocity-driven cooperation. Cognition and Emotion, 37(1), 117–127. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2022.2146057.
8.
BicăA.CrețuR. Z.PodinaI. R. (2021). Money versus social rank: An empirical investigation of unfairness in social anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 45(4), 642–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10608-020-10188-Z/FIGURES/3
9.
BlountS. (1995). When social outcomes Aren′t fair: The effect of causal attributions on preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1068
10.
ClarkD. M.WellsA. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In HeimbergR. G.LiebowitzM. R.HopeD. A.SchneierF. R. (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 69–93). The Guilford Press.
11.
CremersH. R.VeerI. M.SpinhovenP.RomboutsS. A. R. B.RoelofsK. (2015). Neural sensitivity to social reward and punishment anticipation in social anxiety disorder. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8(JAN), 439. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNBEH.2014.00439/ABSTRACT
12.
CrusiusJ.LangeJ. (2014). What catches the envious eye? Attentional biases within malicious and benign envy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JESP.2014.05.007
13.
DarcyK.DavilaJ.BeckJ. G. (2005). Is social anxiety associated with both interpersonal avoidance and interpersonal dependence?Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29(1), 171–186.
14.
DavilaJ.BeckJ. G. (2002). Is social anxiety associated with impairment in close relationships? A preliminary investigation. Behavior Therapy, 33(3), 427–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(02)80037-5
15.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioural, and biomedical sciences. Behaviour Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
16.
FehrE.CamererC. F. (2007). Social neuroeconomics: The neural circuitry of social preferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(10), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TICS.2007.09.002
17.
FengC.CaoJ.LiY.WuH.MobbsD. (2018). The pursuit of social acceptance: aberrant conformity in social anxiety disorder. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 13(8), 809–817. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsy052.
18.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(1), 117–140.
19.
FrescoD. M.ColesM. E.HeimbergR. G.LiebowitzM. R.HamiS.SteinM. B.GoetzD. (2001). The liebowitz social anxiety scale: A comparison of the psychometric properties of self-report and clinician-administered formats. Psychological Medicine, 31(6), 1025–1035. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291701004056
20.
GilbertP. (2000). The relationship of shame, social anxiety and depression: The role of the evaluation of social rank. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Clin. Psychol. Psychother, 7(1), 174–189.
21.
GilbertP.TrowerP. (2001). Evolution and process in social anxiety. In International handbook of social anxiety: Concepts, research and interventions relating to the self and shyness (pp. 259–279). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
22.
GoodmanF. R.KelsoK. C.WiernikB. M.KashdanT. B. (2021). Social comparisons and social anxiety in daily life: An experience-sampling approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 130(5), 468–489. https://doi.org/10.1037/ABN0000671
23.
GüthW.SchmittbergerR.SchwarzeB. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3(4), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
24.
HaberS. N.KnutsonB. (2010). The reward circuit: Linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology: Official Publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 35(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/NPP.2009.129
25.
HarléK. M.AllenJ. J. B.SanfeyA. G. (2010). The impact of depression on social economic decision making. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119(2), 440–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0018612
26.
HarléK. M.SanfeyA. G. (2007). Incidental sadness biases social economic decisions in the ultimatum game. Emotion, 7(4), 876–881. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.876
27.
HirschfeldR. M. A.KlermanG. L.GoughH. G.BarrettJ.KorchinS. J.ChodoffP. (1977). A measure of interpersonal dependency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41(6), 610–618. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA4106_6
28.
KimbrelN. A. (2008). A model of the development and maintenance of generalized social phobia. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(4), 592–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPR.2007.08.003
29.
KnochD.Pascual-LeoneA.MeyerK.TreyerV.FehrE. (2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science (New York, N.Y.), 314(5800), 829–832. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1129156
30.
McCarthyP. A.MorinaN. (2020). Exploring the association of social comparison with depression and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 27(5), 640–671. https://doi.org/10.1002/CPP.2452
31.
MoscovitchD. A. (2009). What is the core fear in social phobia? A new model to facilitate individualized case conceptualization and treatment. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 16(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CBPRA.2008.04.002
32.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
33.
RodebaughT. L.BielakT.VidovicV.MoscovitchD. A. (2016). The effects of social anxiety on interpersonal evaluations of warmth and dominance. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 38(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JANXDIS.2016.01.002
34.
RodebaughT. L.LimM. H.ShumakerE. A.LevinsonC. A.ThompsonT. (2015). Social anxiety and friendship quality over time. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 44(6), 502–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2015.1062043
35.
RodebaughT. L.TongeN. A.WeismanJ. S.LimM. H.FernandezK. C.BogdanR. (2017). The behavioral economics of social anxiety disorder reveal a robust effect for interpersonal traits. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 95(1), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BRAT.2017.06.003
36.
RytwinskiN. K.FrescoD. M.HeimbergR. G.ColesM. E.LiebowitzM. R.CissellS.HofmannS. G. (2009). Screening for social anxiety disorder with the self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Depression and Anxiety, 26(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/DA.20503
37.
SalamoneJ. D. (1994). The involvement of nucleus accumbens dopamine in appetitive and aversive motivation. Behavioural Brain Research, 61(2), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(94)90153-8
38.
StiglerG.StiglerG. (1950). The development of utility theory. I. Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1086/256962
39.
SulsJ.WillsT. A. (Eds.), (1991). Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
40.
ThielmannI.SpadaroG.BallietD.AmsterdamV. U. (2020). Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000217.supp
41.
ToneE. B.NahmiasE.BakemanR.KvaranT.BrosnanS. F.FaniN.SchrothE. A. (2019). Social anxiety and social behaviour: A test of predictions from an evolutionary model. Clinical Psychological Science, 7(1), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618794923
42.
TrowerP.GilbertP. (1989). New theoretical conceptions of social anxiety and social phobia. Clinical Psychology Review, 9(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(89)90044-5
43.
VersellaM. V.PiccirilloM. L.PotterC. M.OlinoT. M.HeimbergR. G. (2016). Anger profiles in social anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 37(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JANXDIS.2015.10.008
44.
WoodJ. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106(1), 231–248.
45.
YamagishiT.HoritaY.MifuneN.HashimotoH.LiY.ShinadaM.SimunovicD. (2012). Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(50), 20364–20368. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212126109
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
