A quality father-child relationship is important for the child’s social and emotional development, which may affect one’s self-efficacy in the future. Research showed that fatherhood attitudes change over time. In the current study, individuals in generations X, Y and Z evaluated their relationships with their fathers retrospectively and their own general self-efficacy and it was examined whether participants’ perceived fatherhood attitudes and general self-efficacy levels varied according to their gender and generation they were in. The study data were obtained through survey from 516 participants aged 18-58 living in Türkiye. Participants between the ages of 18–23 were considered as generation Z, 24-43 as generation Y and 44-58 as generation X. The data was collected between April 2023 and May 2023 through scales in an online survey platform. According to the results of MANOVA analyses, perceived fathers’ negative emotional approach and father communication attitude differed between generations. Accordingly, perceived fathers’ negative emotional approach of generation Z was significantly higher than the score of generation X. On the other hand, the perceived father’s communication attitude score of generation Z was significantly lower than the scores of generation X and generation Y. In addition, perceived fatherhood sub-dimensions did not differ by gender. As for self-efficacy, some dimensions of self-efficacy perceptions of generation Z were also found to be lower than generations X and Y. Resistance dimension of self-efficacy was also found to differ by gender. Accordingly, men’s resistance scores were significantly higher than women’s scores. The results of the study were discussed by considering the general characteristics of the generations and evaluating gender roles. In addition, the possible limitations of the participants' retrospective assessment of their relationship with their fathers were discussed.
AdamsonsK.JohnsonS. K. (2013). An updated and expanded meta-analysis of nonresident fathering and child well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(4), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033786
AltuntuğN. (2012). Kuşaktan Kuşağa Tüketim Olgusu ve Geleceğin Tüketici Profili. Organizasyon Ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), 203–212.
4.
AmatoP.RiveraF. (1999). Paternal involvement and children’s behavior problems. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(2), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/353755
5.
AmatoP. R.GilbrethJ. G. (1999). Nonresident fathers and children’s well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(3), 557–573. https://doi.org/10.2307/353560
6.
AydınG. Ç.BaşolO. (2014). X ve Y kuşağı: Çalışmanın anlamında bir değişme var mı?Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges, 4(4), 1–15.
7.
BaileyJ. A.HillK. G.OesterleS.HawkinsJ. D. (2009). Parenting practices and problem behavior across three generations: Monitoring, harsh discipline, and drug use in the intergenerational transmission of externalizing behavior. Developmental Psychology, 45(5), 1214–1226. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016129
BanduraA.BarbaranelliC.CapraraG. V.PastorelliC. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67(3), 1206–1222. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131888
10.
Başerer- BerberZ.Karakuş-UmarE. (2022). Toplumsal Cinsiyet Eşitsizlikleri ve Özyeterlilik İlişkisi Üzerinden bir Değerlendirme. Ankara Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(10), 147–156.
11.
BassiM.StecaP.FaveA. D.CapraraG. V. (2007). Academic self-efficacy beliefs and quality of experience in learning. Youth Adolesc, 36(3), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9069-y
12.
BayraktarV.DamarM.ÖzçelikA. D. (2024). Investigating perceived paternal attitudes of children aged between 9 and 17 Years. Acta Educationis Generalis, 14(1), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2024-0007
13.
BekmezciM. (2017). Kuşakların Karşılaştırılması ve İş Dünyasında ‘Y’ Kuşağına Kuramsal bir Bakış. İİSBF Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(7), 101–111.
14.
BelliM.Akçay-DidişenN.Bal-YılmazH. (2021). Geçmişten Günümüze Değişen babalık rolü ve çocuk Gelişimine Katkıları. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(2), 366–371.
15.
BosoniM. L.BakerS. (2015). The intergenerational transmission of fatherhood: A comparative study of the UK and Italy. Families, Relationships and Societies, 4(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674315x14236617437428
16.
BronfenbrennerU. (1985). Freedom and discipline across the decades. In BeckerG.BeckerH.HuberL. (Eds.), Ordnung und unordnung (pp. 326–339): Beltz.
17.
CabreraN.Tamis-LeMondaC. S.BradleyR. H.HofferthS.LambM. E. (2000). Fatherhood in the twenty- first century. Child Development, 71(1), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00126
18.
CapaldiD. M.PearsK. C.PattersonG. R.OwenL. D. (2003). Continuity of parenting practices across generations in an at-risk sample: A prosepective comparison of direct and mediated associations. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022518123387
19.
CarstensenL. L.MikelsJ. (2005). At the intersection of emotion and cognition: Aging and the positivity effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00348.x
20.
CharlesS. T.CarstensenL. L. (2008). Unpleasant situations elicit different emotional responses in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 23(3), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013284
21.
ChenQ.KongY.GaoW.MoL. (2018). Effects of socioeconomic status, parent–child relationship, and learning motivation on reading ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1297. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01297
22.
Clarke-StewartA.FriedmanS. (1987). Child development: Infancy through adolescence. John Wiley & Sons.
23.
ClearfieldM. W.NelsonN. M. (2006). Sex differences in mothers' Speech and play behavior with 6, 9, and 14-Month-old Infants. Sex Roles, 54(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-8874-1
24.
ColesR. L. (2001). The parenting roles and goals of single Black fulltime fathers. Western Journal of Black Studies, 25, 101–116.
25.
CollinsW. A.MaccobyE. E.SteinbergL.HetheringtonE. M.BornsteinM. H. (2000). Contemporary research on parenting: The case for nature and nurture. American Psychologist, 55(2), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.218
26.
CongerR. D.NepplT.KimK. J.ScaramellaL. (2003). Angry and aggressive behavior across three generations: A prospective, longitudinal study of parents and children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022570107457
27.
ConwayM. A.HolmesE. A. (2005). Autobiographical memory and the working self. In BraisbryN. R.ve GellatlyA. R. H. (Eds.), Cognitive Psychology (pp. 507–538). Oxford University Press.
28.
ConwayM. A.Pleydell-PearceC. W.Pleydell-Pearce. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self- memory systems. Psychological Review, 107(2), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.261
29.
CrumpackerM.CrumpackerJ. M. (2007). Succession planning and generational Stereotypes: Should HR consider age-based values and attitudes a relevant factoror a passing Fad?Public Personnel Management, 36(4), 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600703600405
DökmenZ. (2009). Toplumsal Cinsiyet, sosyal Psikolojik Açıklamalar. Remzi kitapevi.
34.
EcclesJ. S.AdlerT. F.FuttermanR.GoffS. B.KaczalaC. M.MeeceJ. L.MidgleyC. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In SpenceJ. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). W. H. Freeman.
35.
EhrenbergM. F.Gearing-SmallM.HunterM. A.SmallB. J. (2001). Childcare task division and shared parenting attitudes in dual-earner families with young children. Family. Relat, 50(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00143.x
36.
ElderG. H. (1994). Time, human agency, and social change perspectives on the life-course. Social Psychology Quarter, 57, 4–15.
37.
ElderG. H.ModellJ.ParkeR. D. (1993). Children in time and place: Developmental and historical Insights (p. 289). Cambridge University Press.
38.
EllisB. J.BatesJ. E.DodgeK. A.FergussonD. M.HorwoodL. J.PettitG. S.WoodwardL. (2003). Does father absence place daughters at special risk for early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy?Child Development, 74(3), 801–821. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00569
39.
ErolV. (2022). Sosyal Medyanın Türk aile Yapısına Etkisi. KMU Journal of Social and Economic Research, 24(43), 1127–1139.
40.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
41.
FeiertagJ.BergeZ. L. (2008). Training generation N: How educators should approach the Net generation. Education + Training, 50(6), 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910810901782
FinleyG. E.SchwartzS. J. (2007). Father involvement and long-term young adult outcomes: The differential contributions of divorce and gender. Family Court Review, 45(4), 573–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00172.x
44.
FlouriE.BuchananA. (2004). Early father’s and mother’s involvement and child’s later educational outcomes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(Pt 2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904773839806
45.
GarciaO. F.FuentesM. C.GraciaE.SerraE.GarciaF. (2020). Parenting warmth and Strictness across three generations: Parenting styles and psychosocial adjustment. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(20), 7487. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207487
46.
GökselA.GüneşG. (2017). Kuşaklar arası Farklılaşma: X ve Y Kuşaklarının Örgütsel Sessizlik Davranışı Bağlamında analizi. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(3), 807–828.
47.
GrossJ. J.CarstensenL. L.PasupathiJ.TsaiC. G.SkorpenA. Y. C.HsuA. Y. (1997). Emotion and aging: Experience, expression, and control. Psychology and Aging, 12(4), 590–599. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.12.4.590
48.
Güngörmüş-ÖzkardeşO. (2010). Baba Olmak. Remzi Kitabevi.
49.
HaeberleK.HerzbergJ.HobbyT. (2009). Leading the Multigenerational work Force. Healthcare Executive, 24(5), 66–67.
50.
HopsH.DavisB.LeveC.SheeberL. (2003). Cross-generational transmission of aggressive parent behavior: A prospective, mediational examination. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022522224295
51.
İnciM. A.DenizÜ. (2015). Baba Tutumları ile Çocuğun Yaşı, Cinsiyeti, Doğum Sırası ve Kardeş Sayısı Değişkenleri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(1), 57–68.
52.
KağıtçıbaşıÇ. (2010). Benlik, aile ve insan gelişimi: Kültürel psikoloji. Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları.
53.
KaraD.SümerN. (2022). The role of paternal parenting and Co-parenting quality in children’s academic self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 772023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.772023
54.
KaranfilogluM.SaglamM.TopsumerF. (2022). Advertisement perception and generations: Comparison between X, Y, and Z generations. Iletisim Kuram ve Arastirma Dergisi, 2022(58), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.47998/ikad.1057266
55.
KavakA. B. (2020). Z Kuşağı Çalışanların Çalışma Değerlerinin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Ankara İlinde Bir alan Araştırması. [Master thesis]. Çankaya University.
56.
KeleşH. N. (2011). Y kuşağı Çalışanlarının Motivasyon Profillerinin Belirlenmesine Yönelik bir Araştırma. Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 129–139.
57.
KellerH.LammB. (2005). Parenting as the expression of Sociohistorical time: The case of German Individualisation. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(3), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/01650250544000026
58.
KellyJ.LambM. (2000). Using child development research to make appropriate custody and access decisions for young children. Family & Conciliation Courts Review, 38(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.2000.tb00577.x
59.
KeshavarzS.MountsN. S. (2017). Perceived parenting style of fathers and Iranian adolescents’ self-efficacy: The moderating role of gender and education. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 178(5), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2017.1355772
60.
KocatepeB.BilgiS. (2018). Toplumsal bir inşa olarak babalık: Annelerin yaşam öykülerinde baba imgesi. Fe Dergi, 10(2), 43–59.
KylesD. (2005). Managing Your Multigenerational Workforce. Strategic Finance, 87(6), 53–56.
63.
LambM. E. (2000). The history of research on father involvement: An overview. Marriage Family Rev, 29(2-3), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v29n02_03
64.
LambM. E. (Ed.), (2004). The role of the father in child development (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
65.
LambM. E.OppenheimD. (1989). Fatherhood and father-child relationships: Five years of research. In CathS. H.GunsbergA. G. ve L. (Eds.), Fathers and their families içinde (11-26). Analytic Press, Inc.
66.
LambM. E.PleckJ. H.CharnovE. L.LevineJ. A. (1987). A biosocial perspective on pa-ternal behavior and involvement. In LancasterJ. B.AltmannJ.RossiA. S.SherrodL. R. (Eds.), Parenting across the lifespan: Biosocial perspectives (pp. 111–142): Aldine.
LiX. (2020). Fathers’ involvement in Chinese Societies: Increasing presence, Uneven progress. Child Development Perspectives, 14(3), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12375
69.
LuszczynskaA.ScholzU.SchwarzerR. (2010). The general self-efficacy scale: Multicultural validation studies. Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439–457.
70.
LuyckxK.TildesleyE. A.SoenensB.AndrewsJ. A.HampsonS. E.PetersonM.DuriezB. (2011). Parenting and trajectories of children’s maladaptive behaviors: A 12-year prospective community study. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40(3), 468–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.563470
MarsiglioW.AmatoP.DayR. D.LambM. E. (2000). Scholarship on fatherhood in the 1990s and beyond. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1173–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01173.x
73.
MatherM.CarstensenL. L. (2005). Aging and motivated cognition: The positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.005
MercanZ.ŞahinF. T. (2017). Babalık rolü ve babalık rolü algısı. Uluslararası Erken Çocukluk Eğitimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 1–10.
76.
MulyadiS.RahardjoW.BasukiA. M. H. (2016). The role of parent-child relationship, self-esteem, academic self-efficacy to academic stress. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci, 217, 603–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.063
ÖzyürekA.Tezel-ŞahinF. (2005). 5 ve 6 Yaş Grubunda Çocuğu Olan Ebeveynlerin Tutumlarının İncelenmesi. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(2), 19–34.
79.
O'GradyK. E.FredaS.MikulkaJ. S.MikulkaP. J. (1979). A comparison of the Adjective Check list, Bem Sex role Inventory, and personal Attributes Questionnaire masculinity and Femininity subscales. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14(2), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1402_6
80.
PaquetteD.DumontC. (2013). The father-child Activation relationship, Sex differences, and Attachment Disorganization in Toddlerhood. Child Development Research, 2013, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/102860
81.
ParkeR. D. (2000). Father involvement: A developmental psychological perspective. Marriage & Family Review, 29(2-3), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v29n02_04
PleckJ. H. (1997). Paternal involvement: Levels, sources, and consequences. In LambM. E. (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp. 66–103). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
86.
PoyrazM. (2007). Babaların Babalık Rolünü Algılamalarıyla Kendi Ebeveynlerinin Tutumları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Gazi University. [Master thesis].
87.
RaneT. R.McBRIDEB. A. (2000). Identity theory as a guide to understanding fathers’ involvement with their children. Journal of Family Issues, 21(3), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251300021003004
RobinsonK. A.PerezT.White-LevatichA.Linnenbrink-GarciaL. (2022). Gender differences and roles of two science self-efficacy beliefs in predicting Post-College outcomes. J Exp Educ. 90(2), 344-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020,
90.
RohnerR. P.KhalequeM. N. R.RiazU.KhanS.SadequeH.LaukkalaH. (2005). Agreement between children’s and mothers’ perception of Maternal acceptance and Rejection: A comparative study in Finland and Pakistan. Ethos, 33(3), 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.2005.33.3.367
91.
SarkadiA.KristianssonR.OberklaidF.BrembergS. (2008). Fathers’ involvement and children’s developmental outcomes: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Acta Paediatrica, 97(2), 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00572.x
92.
SawyerM. G.ArneyF. M.BaghurstP. A.ClarkJ. J.GraetzB. W.KoskyR. J.NurcombeB.PattonG. C.PriorM. R.RaphaelB.ReyJ. M.WhaitesL. C.ZubrickS. R. (2001). The mental health of young people in Australia: Key findings from the child and adolescent component of the national survey of mental health and well-being. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry, 35(6), 806–814. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2001.00964.x
93.
SerbinL. A.KarpJ. (2004). The intergenerational transfer of psychosocial risk: Mediators of vulnerability and resilience. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 333–363. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145228
94.
ShererM.MadduxJ. E.MercandanteB.Prentice-DunnS.JacobsB.RogersR. W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51(2), 663–671. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663
95.
SmithC. A.FarringtonD. P. (2004). Continuities in antisocial behavior and parenting across three generations. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(2), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00216.x
96.
SmithG. J. (23-25 March 2007). Parenting effects on self-efficacy and self-esteem in late and how those factors impact adjustment to College. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the eastern psychological association.
97.
StoneG. (2002). Nonresidential father postdivorce well-being: The role of social support. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 36(3-4), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1300/j087v36n03_08
98.
SuizzoM. A.RackleyK. R.RobbinsP. A.JacksonK. M.RarickJ. R.McClainS. (2017). The unique effects of fathers’ warmth on adolescents’ positive beliefs and behaviours: Pathways to resilience in low-income families. Sex Roles, 77(1-2), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0696-9
99.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
ThornberryT. P.Freeman-GallantA.LizotteA. J.KrohnM. D.SmithC. A. (2003). Linked lives: The intergenerational transmission of antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022574208366
102.
TopçuG. (2016). Türkiye’deki Sosyal Politikaların aile Merkezliliğine Babalık Tecrübesinden Bakmak: Ankara Örneği. Hacettepe University. [Master thesis].
103.
TopçuG. (2018). Varsayılan aile kıskacında babalık: Türkiye’de farklı babalık algıları ve sosyal politika ilişkisi. Toplum Ve Bilim, 145, 54–102.
104.
TulganB.MartinC. A. (2001). Managing Generation Y: Global citizens born in the late seventies and early eighties. HRD press. (2013). Y Kuşağı. Kafe Kültür Yayıncılık.
105.
TürkA. (2013). Y Kuşağı. Kafekültür Yayıncılık.
106.
UludağlıN. P. (2017). Baba katılımında etkili faktörler ve baba katılımının baba, anne ve çocuk açısından yararları. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 20(39), 70–88.
107.
UyanıkÖ.ÜnsalK. Ü.İnalK. G.CanY. M. (2016). An investigation of the relationship between fathers and their children at preschool level. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 9(4), 515–531.
108.
Uysalİ. (2013). Akademisyenlerin Genel Öz-Yeterlik İnançları: AİBÜ Eğitim Fakültesi Örneği. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2).
109.
UzunH. (2020). Babalık Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik çalışması. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(20), 551–567.
YıldırımF.İlhanİ. Ö. (2010). Genel öz yeterlilik ölçeği Türkçe formunun geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 21(4), 301–308.
112.
YıldızR.EmecenS. (2019). Hayatı anlamlandırmada kuşaklar arası farklılıklar: Üç kuşak karşılaştırmalı analizi. Sosyal Ve Kültürel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 361.
113.
ZeybekoğluÖ. (2013). Günümüzde erkeklerin gözünden babalık ve aile. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, 3(2), 297. https://doi.org/10.13114/MJH/201322486
