Decisions under risk are a particular case of decisional skills taking place in complex and mostly unpredictable situations, where affective connotation of deciding is highly relevant. We aimed at investigating decisional processes under risk by outlining individual risk-taking (RT) and risk management (RM) attitudes via realistic decision-making and, in keeping with the risk-as-feeling hypothesis, at exploring implicit physiological correlates of such processes. 35 participants were presented with realistic situations where they had to make decisions by choosing between alternatives connoted by different levels of riskiness. Concurrently, autonomic physiological activation (cardiovascular and electrodermal activity) was recorded. Data analysis highlighted that: (i) participants showed higher propensity towards risk management than risk-taking; (ii) the propensity towards both risk taking and risk management was significantly determined by physiological markers of autonomic activity; and (iii) risk taking and risk management indices showed associations with different autonomic measures, respectively heart rate and skin conductance metrics.
AngiolettiL.TormenF.BalconiM. (2022). Judgment and embodied cognition of lawyers. Moral decision-making and interoceptive physiology in the legal field. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(3), 853342. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.853342
2.
ArkorfulH.HiltonS. K. (2022). Locus of control and entrepreneurial intention: A study in a developing economy. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 38(2), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-04-2020-0051
3.
BalconiM.AngiolettiL.CrivelliD. (2020). Neuro-empowerment of executive functions in the workplace: The reason why. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(July), 1519. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01519
4.
BalconiM.CrivelliD.CastiglioniC.LozzaE. (2019). Social frame and tax compliance modulate electrophysiological and autonomic responses following tax-related decisions. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 4713. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41156-7
5.
BalconiM.FrondaG. (2019). Physiological correlates of moral decision-making in the professional domain. Brain Sciences, 9(9), 229. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9090229
6.
BalconiM.NataleM. R.BenabdallahN.CrivelliD. (2017). New business models: The agents and inter-agents in a neuroscientific domain. Neuropsychological Trends, 21(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.7358/neur-2017-021-nata
7.
BecharaA.DamasioH.DamasioA. R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10(3), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/10.3.295
8.
BenarrochE. E. (1993). The central autonomic network: Functional organization, dysfunction, and perspective. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 68(10), 988–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-6196(12)62272-1
9.
BerntsonG. G.QuigleyK. S.LozanoD. (2007). Cardiovascular psychophysiology. In CacioppoJ. T.TassinaryL. G.BerntsonG. G. (Eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology (3rd ed., pp. 182–210). Cambridge University Press.
10.
Carland IIIJ. W.Carland JrJ. W.CarlandJ. A. C.Pearce JrJ. W. (1995). Risk taking propensity among entrepreneurs, small business owners and managers. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 15–23.
11.
CassioliF.CrivelliD.BalconiM. (2022). Machine vs. human agents in moral dilemmas: Evidence from EEG and behavioral data. 2022 International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME), 8(10), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCME55909.2022.9988331
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (II). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
CrivelliD.AcconitoC.BalconiM. (2024). What happens to information, situational cues, and individual strategies in decision-making? The contribution of latent decisional profiles in realistic decisions. Decision. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-024-00374-3
14.
CrivelliD.AllegrettaR. A.BalconiM. (2023). The “status quo bias” in response to external feedback in decision-makers. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 9(4), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-023-00230-1
15.
CrivelliD.BalconiM. (2017). Agentività e competenze sociali: riflessioni teoriche e implicazioni per il management. Ricerche Di Psicologia, 40(3), 349–363. https://doi.org/10.3280/RIP2017-003006
16.
CrivelliD.BalconiM. (2017). The agent brain: A review of non-invasive brain stimulation studies on sensing agency. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(November), 229. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00229
17.
CrivelliD.BalconiM. (2023). Shared emotions, interpersonal syntonization, and group decision-making: A multi-agent perspective. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17(3), 1251855. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1251855
18.
DamasioA. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 351(1346), 1413–1420. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1996.0125
19.
DawsonM. E.SchellA. M.FilionD. L. (2007). The electrodermal system. In CacioppoJ. T.TassinaryL. G.BerntsonG. G. (Eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). Cambridge University Press.
20.
ForteG.MorelliM.GrässlerB.CasagrandeM. (2022). Decision making and heart rate variability: A systematic review. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3901
21.
FowlesD. C. (1980). The three arousal model: Implications of Gray’s two-factor learning theory for heart rate, electro dermal activity, and psychopathy. Psychophysiology, 17(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1980.tb00117.x
22.
HamptonA. N.AdolphsR.TyszkaM. J.O’DohertyJ. P. (2007). Contributions of the amygdala to reward expectancy and choice signals in human prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 55(4), 545–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.022
23.
HermanA. M.EspositoG.TsakirisM. (2021). Body in the face of uncertainty: The role of autonomic arousal and interoception in decision‐making under risk and ambiguity. Psychophysiology, 58(8), Article e13840. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13840
LadouceurR.BouchardC.RhéaumeN.JacquesC.FerlandF.LeblondJ.WalkerM. (2000). Is the SOGS an accurate measure of pathological gambling among children, adolescents and adults?Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009443516329
26.
LlewellynD. J. (2008). The psychology of risk taking: Toward the integration of psychometric and neuropsychological paradigms. The American Journal of Psychology, 121(3), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/20445472
LucarelliC.UbertiP.BrighettiG.MaggiM. (2015). Risky choices and emotion-based learning. Journal of Economic Psychology, 49(23), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2015.04.004
29.
MarkA. L.VictorR. G.NerhedC.WallinB. G. (1985). Microneurographic studies of the mechanisms of sympathetic nerve responses to static exercise in humans. Circulation Research, 57(3), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.57.3.461
30.
MendesW. B. (2009). Assessing autonomic nervous system activity. In Harmon-JonesE.BeerJ. S. (Eds.), Methods in Social neuroscience (pp. 118–147). Guilford Press.
31.
MishraS. (2014). Decision-making under risk: Integrating perspectives from Biology, economics, and psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 18(3), 280–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314530517
32.
MishraS.LalumièreM. L. (2011). Individual differences in risk-propensity: Associations between personality and behavioral measures of risk. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(6), 869–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.11.037
NicholsonN.SoaneE.Fenton‐O’CreevyM.WillmanP. (2005). Personality and domain‐specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987032000123856
35.
PrellR.OpatzO.MeratiG.GescheB.GungaH.-C.MaggioniM. A. (2020). Heart rate variability, risk-taking behavior and resilience in firefighters during a simulated extinguish-fire task. Frontiers in Physiology, 11(1), 482. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00482
36.
QuadtL.CritchleyH.NagaiY. (2022). Cognition, emotion, and the central autonomic network. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic & Clinical, 238(2), 102948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2022.102948
37.
SakaiY. (2019). On the economics of risk and uncertainty: A historical perspective. In J. M. Keynes versus Fh Knight (pp. 17–37). Springe. In Y. Sakai (Ed.), J. M. Keynes Versus F. H. K. Risk, Probability, and Uncertainty (pp. 17–37). Springer.
38.
SekścińskaK.JaworskaD.Rudzinska-WojciechowskaJ. (2021). Self-esteem and financial risk-taking. Personality and Individual Differences, 172(3),110576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110576
39.
ThayerJ. F.LaneR. D. (2000). A model of neurovisceral integration in emotion regulation and dysregulation. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61(3), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00338-4
40.
ThayerJ. F.LaneR. D. (2009). Claude Bernard and the heart–brain connection: Further elaboration of a model of neurovisceral integration. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(2), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.08.004
41.
VanutelliM. E.MeroniF.FrondaG.BalconiM.LucchiariC. (2020). Gender differences and unfairness processing during economic and moral decision-making: A fNIRS study. Brain Sciences, 10(9), 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10090647
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
