The “bad-begets-bad” phenomenon describes how witnessed or perceived misconduct in an organization promotes mental states and behavior that encourage further misconduct. Based in two perspectives on how the Dark Triad (DT) constructs (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy) differentiate, we proposed their roles in contributing to the bad-begets-bad phenomenon. A convenience sample of college students (N = 454) completed an online study in which they read vignettes depicting workplace misconduct wherein a reporting incentive was (incentive condition) or was not (no-incentive condition) offered. Subsequently, they reported their likelihood of possessing mental states (e.g., goals) and engaging in behavior broadly reflective of the bad-begets-bad phenomenon. Lastly, they completed the Short Dark Triad (SD3) questionnaire to assess narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. We used a series of step-wise regression models to analyze the data. Consistent with the “malicious two” perspective on the DT, only Machiavellianism and psychopathy consistently predicted mental states and behavior reflective of the bad-begets-bad phenomenon. Also, consistent with the “cautious and adaptable Machiavellian perspective,” only Machiavellianism interacted with the incentive condition to influence people’s willingness to report misconduct (i.e., not further promote misconduct). Broadly, the data contribute to understanding the role of the DT in organizational settings and support two perspectives on how the DT should operate in the context of witnessing workplace misconduct.
AndersonC. A.BushmanB. J. (2001). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science, 12(5), 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00366
2.
AquinoK.DouglasS. C. (2003). Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hierarchical status. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 90(1), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00517-4
3.
BackM. D. (2018). The narcissistic admiration and rivalry concept. In HermannA. D.BrunellA. B.FosterJ. D. (Eds.), Handbook of trait narcissism: Key advances, research methods, and controversies (pp. 55–67). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92171-6_6
4.
BennettR. J.RobinsonS. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349
5.
BereczkeiT. (2018). Machiavellian intelligence hypothesis revisited: What evolved cognitive and social skills may underlie human manipulation. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 12(1), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000096
6.
ChatterjeeA.HambrickD. C. (2007). It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 351–386. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.3.351
7.
CialdiniR. B.KallgrenC. A.RenoR. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201–234). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5
8.
DeShongH. L.GrantD. M.Mullins-SweattS. N. (2015). Comparing models of counterproductive workplace behaviors: The five-factor model and the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.001
9.
DouglasS. C.MartinkoM. J. (2001). Exploring the role of individual differences in the prediction of workplace aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.547
10.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
11.
FergusonM.BarryB. (2011). I know what you did: The effects of interpersonal deviance on bystanders. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021708
12.
FurnhamA.RichardsS. C.PaulhusD. L. (2013). The dark triad of personality: A 10 year review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018
13.
GalvinB. M.LangeD.AshforthB. E. (2015). Narcissistic organizational identification: Seeing oneself as central to the organization’s identity. Academy of Management Review, 40(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0103
14.
GinoF.AyalS.ArielyD. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20(3), 393–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02306.x
15.
GlombT. M. (2010). Predicting workplace aggression: Reciprocal aggression, organizational, and individual antecedents. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 13(2), 249–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-13-02-2010-B005
16.
GrapsasS.BrummelmanE.BackM. D.DenissenJ. J. A. (2020). The “why” and “how” of narcissism: A process model of narcissistic status pursuit. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 15(1), 150–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619873350
17.
HartW.BreedenC.RichardsonK. (2019). Differentiating dark personalities on impression management. Personality and Individual Differences, 147(1), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.030
18.
HartW.KinradeC.TortorielloG. K.RichardsonK.BreedenC. J. (2020). Identifying with the “bad” guy: A novel account for apparent moral-judgment deficiencies in antagonistic personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, 110161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110161
19.
HartW.RichardsonK.TortorielloG. K. (2018). Meet your public relations team: People with dark traits may help you manage your image. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.019
20.
HarunavamweM.KanengoniH. (2013). The impact of monetary and non-monetary rewards on motivation among lower level employees in selected retail shops. African Journal of Business Management, 7(38), 3929–3935. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM2012.1381
21.
HelleA. C.DeShongH. L.LengelG. J.MeyerN. A.ButlerJ.Mullins-SweattS. N. (2018). Utilizing Five Factor Model facets to conceptualize counterproductive, unethical, and organizational citizenship workplace behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 135, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.056
22.
HungT. K.ChiN. W.LuW. L. (2009). Exploring the relationships between perceived coworker loafing and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating role of a revenge motive. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24(3), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-009-9104-6
23.
IckesW.ReidheadS.PattersonM. (1986). Machiavellianism and self-monitoring: As different as “me” and “you”. Social Cognition, 4(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1986.4.1.58
24.
JonasonP. K.SlomskiS.PartykaJ. (2012). The Dark Triad at work: How toxic employees get their way. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 449–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.008
25.
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2009). Machiavellianism. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 93–108). The Guilford Press.
26.
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
27.
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2017). Duplicity among the dark triad: Three faces of deceit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000139
KesslerS. R.BandelliA. C.SpectorP. E.BormanW. C.NelsonC. E.PenneyL. M. (2010). Re‐examining machiavelli: A three‐dimensional model of machiavellianism in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(8), 1868–1896. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00643.x
30.
Kish-GephartJ. J.HarrisonD. A.TreviñoL. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017103
31.
MayerD. M.KuenziM.GreenbaumR. L. (2010). Examining the link between ethical leadership and employee misconduct: The mediating role of ethical climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(S1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0794-0
32.
MillerJ. D.HyattC. S.Maples‐KellerJ. L.CarterN. T.LynamD. R. (2017). Psychopathy and machiavellianism: A distinction without a difference?Journal of Personality, 85(4), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12251
33.
MillerJ. D.VizeC.CroweM. L.LynamD. R. (2019). A critical appraisal of the dark-triad literature and suggestions for moving forward. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(4), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419838233
34.
Muhammad HafidzS. W. (2012). Individual differences as antecedents of counterproductive work behaviour. Asian Social Science, 8(13), 220–226. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n13p220
35.
MurisP.MerckelbachH.OtgaarH.MeijerE. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the dark triad (narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 12(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616666070
36.
O’BoyleE. H.ForsythD. R.BanksG. C.StoryP. A.WhiteC. D. (2015). A meta‐analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the dark triad and five‐factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 644–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12126
37.
O’BoyleE. H.Jr.ForsythD. R.BanksG. C.McDanielM. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025679
PapageorgiouK. A.GianniouF. M.WilsonP.MonetaG. B.BilelloD.CloughP. J. (2019). The bright side of dark: Exploring the positive effect of narcissism on perceived stress through mental toughness. Personality and Individual Differences, 139(3), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.004
40.
PaulhusD. L. (2014). Toward a taxonomy of dark personalities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(6), 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414547737
41.
PaulhusD. L.CurtisS. R.JonesD. N. (2018). Aggression as a trait: The dark tetrad alternative. Current opinion in psychology, 19, 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.007
42.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
43.
RauthmannJ. F. (2011). Acquisitive or protective self-presentation of dark personalities? Associations among the dark triad and self-monitoring. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.008
44.
RauthmannJ. F.KolarG. P. (2012). How “dark” are the dark triad traits? Examining the perceived darkness of narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(7), 884–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.020
45.
RobinsonS. L.O’Leary-KellyA. M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 658–672. https://doi.org/10.2307/256963
46.
RoseL.LynamD. R.MillerJ. D. (2023). Measuring the “dark” triad: Comparing the five-factor model antagonistic triad measure to other commonly used self-report instruments. Assessment, 30(3), 10731911231190097. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911231190097
SzabóZ. P.CziborA.RestásP.BereczkeiT. (2018). “The Darkest of all” the relationship between the Dark Triad traits and organizational citizenship behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 352–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.026
50.
TrahairC.BaranL.FlakusM.KowalskiC. M.RogozaR. (2020). The structure of the dark triad traits: A network analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 167, 110265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110265
51.
VardiY. (2001). The effects of organizational and ethical climates on misconduct at work. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(4), 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010710022834
52.
VerhoefM. J.CasebeerA. L. (1997). Broadening horizons: Integrating quantitative and qualitative research. The Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology, 8(2), 65–66. https://doi.org/10.1155/1997/349145
53.
VolmerJ.KochI. K.GoritzA. S. (2016). The bright and dark sides of leaders’ Dark Triad traits: Effects on subordinates’ career success and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.046
54.
ZettlerI.SolgaM. (2013). Not enough of a ‘dark’ trait? Linking machiavellianism to job performance. European Journal of Personality, 27(6), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1912
55.
ZuoS.WangF.XuY.WangF.ZhaoX. (2016). The fragile but bright facet in the dark gem: Narcissism positively predicts personal morality when individual’s self-esteem is at low level. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 272–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.076
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
