We carried out the present meta-analysis study to secure the reliability generalization of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Scale (CAMM) based on its reliability findings in different studies. The study only considered full-text papers in English that were indexed in Web of Science, PubMed, ProQuest, and Scopus and presented a Cronbach’s alpha value of the measurements with the CAMM (209 alpha values out of 155 papers). Using the random effects model and the Bonnet transformation, the relevant analyses yielded the transformed Cronbach’s alpha value of the CAMM to be 0.80 (CI = 0.79-0.81). The present meta-analysis study concluded that the CAMM is rather reliable to be utilized in child and adolescent populations. Besides, moderator analyses to scrutinize the alpha values yielded significant differences in favor of the origin continent of the research and the CAMM-short version (25-item/10-item). Yet, it was not the case with the publication type and the adaptation status of the scale. In a nutshell, future research may confidently employ the 10-item short form of the CAMM to assess mindfulness among children and adolescents.
BaumannI.GruberE.VonderlinE.BentsH.HeidenreichT.KalmarJ.ManderJ. (2022). Psychometric properties of a German version of the child and adolescent mindfulness measure (CAMM) in a community sample. Mindfulness, 13(8), 2082–2091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-022-01943-2
5.
BenderS. L.LawsonT.PalaciosA. M. (2023). Mindfulness measures for children and adolescents: A systematic review. Contemporary School Psychology, 27(1), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-022-00433-5
6.
BonettD. G. (2002). Sample size requirements for testing and estimating coefficient alpha. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27(4), 335–340. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986027004335
7.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P.RothsteinH. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.12
8.
Borquist-ConlonD. S.MaynardB. R.BrendelK. E.FarinaA. S. J. (2019). Mindfulness-based interventions for youth with anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Research on Social Work Practice, 29(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731516684961
9.
BrownK. W.RyanR. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
10.
BrownK. W.RyanR. M.CreswellJ. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400701598298
11.
BrownK. W.WestA. M.LoverichT. M.BiegelG. M. (2011). Assessing adolescent mindfulness: Validation of an adapted Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in adolescent normative and psychiatric populations. Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 1023–1033. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021338
12.
BurkeC. A. (2010). Mindfulness-based approaches with children and adolescents: A preliminary review of current research in an emergent field. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-009-9282-x
13.
Cabedo-PerisJ.Martí-VilarM.Merino-SotoC.Ortiz-MoránM. (2021). Basic empathy scale: A systematic review and reliability generalization meta-analysis. Healthcare, 10(1), 29. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/10/1/29
14.
ChenX.LiangK.HuangL.MuW.DongW.ChenS.ChenS.ChiX. (2022). The psychometric properties and cutoff score of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) in Chinese primary school students. Children, 9(4), 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9040499
15.
ChiesaA.SerrettiA. (2009). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for stress management in healthy people: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, 15(5), 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1089=acm.2008.0495
16.
ChiesiF.DellagiuliaA.LionettiF.BianchiG.PrimiC. (2017). Using item response theory to explore the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). Mindfulness, 8(2), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0604-y
17.
CicchettiD. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
18.
ÇıkrıkçıÖ. (2016). The validity and reliability study of Turkish version of Child and Adolescents Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 24(2), 905–916. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/209709
19.
CunhaM.GalhardoA.Pinto-GouveiaJ. (2013). Child and adolescent mindfulness measure (CAMM): Estudo das características psicométricas da versão portuguesa. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 26(3), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722013000300005
20.
de BruinE. I.ZijlstraB. J. H.BögelsS. M. (2014). The meaning of mindfulness in children and adolescents: Further validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) in two independent samples from The Netherlands. Mindfulness, 5(4), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0196-8
21.
DemirE.ÖzS.AralN.GürsoyF. (2022). A reliability generalization meta-analysis of the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale. Psychological Reports, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941221114413
22.
DionJ.PaquetteL.DaigneaultI.GodboutN.HébertM. (2018). Validation of the French version of the child and adolescent mindfulness measure (CAMM) among samples of French and indigenous youth. Mindfulness, 9(2), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0807-x
23.
DunningD. L.GriffithsK.KuykenW.CraneC.FoulkesL.ParkerJ.DalgleishT. (2019). Research Review: The effects of mindfulness based interventions on cognition and mental health in children and adolescents - a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 60(3), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12980
24.
FieldA. P.GillettR. (2010). How to do a metaanalysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63(3), 665–694. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711010X502733
25.
García-RubioC.Rodríguez-CarvajalR.LangerA. I.PaniaguaD.SteinebachP.AndreuC. I.VaraM. D.CebollaA. (2019). Validation of the Spanish version of the child and adolescent mindfulness measure (CAMM) with samples of Spanish and Chilean children and adolescents. Mindfulness, 10(8), 1502–1517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01108-8
26.
GoldbergS. B.TuckerR. P.GreeneP. A.SimpsonT. L.KearneyD. J.DavidsonR. J. (2017). Is mindfulness research methodology improving over time? A systematic review. PLoS One, 12(10), e0187298. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187298
27.
GoodmanM. S.MadniL. A.SempleR. J. (2017). Measuring mindfulness in youth: Review of current assessments, challenges, and future directions. Mindfulness, 8(6), 1409–1420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0719-9
28.
GrecoL. A.BaerR. A.SmithG. T. (2011). Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the child and adolescent mindfulness measure (CAMM). Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 606–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022819
29.
GreenbergM. T.HarrisA. R. (2012). Nurturing mindfulness in children and youth: Current state of research. Child Development Perspectives, 6(2), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00215.x
30.
GuerraJ.García-GómezM.TuranzasJ.CordónJ. R.Suárez-JuradoC.MestreJ. M. (2019). A brief Spanish version of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). A dispositional mindfulness measure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(8), 1355. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16081355
31.
HakstianA. R.WhalenT. E. (1976). A k-sample significance test for independent alpha coefficients. Psychometrika, 41(2), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291840
32.
HarnettP. H.DaweS. (2012). The contribution of mindfulness-based therapies for children and families and proposed conceptual integration. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 17(4), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2011.00643.x
33.
HayesS. C.StrosahlK. D.WilsonK. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. Guilford Press.
34.
HofmannS. G.SawyerA. T.WittA. A.OhD. (2010). The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018555
Huedo-MedinaT. B.Sánchez-MecaJ.Marín-MartínezF.BotellaJ. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?Psychological Methods, 11(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193
37.
IrwingP.BoothT.HughesD. J. (eds), (2018). The wiley handbook of psychometric testing: A multidisciplinary reference on survey, scale and test development. Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489772
38.
Kabat-ZinnJ. (1982). An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: Theoretical considerations and preliminary results. General Hospital Psychiatry, 4(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-8343(82)90026-3
39.
Kabat ZinnJ. (2003). Mindfulness based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg016
Kabat-ZinnJ.MassionA. O.KristellerJ.PetersonL. G.FletcherK. E.PbertL.LenderkingW. R.SantorelliS. F. (1992). Effectiveness of a meditation-based stress reduction program in the treatment of anxiety disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149(7), 936–943. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.149.7.936
42.
KalmarJ.BaumannI.GruberE.VonderlinE.BentsH.NeubauerA. B.HeidenreichT.ManderJ. (2022). The impact of session-introducing mindfulness and relaxation interventions in individual psychotherapy for children and adolescents: A randomized controlled trial (MARS-CA). Trials, 23(1), 291. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06212-0
43.
KarlJ. A.PradoS. M. M.GračaninA.VerhaeghenP.RamosA.MandalS. P.MichalakJ.ZhangC.-Q.SchmidtC.TranU. S.DruicaE.SolemS.AstaniA.LiuX.LucianoJ. V.TkalčićM.LiljaJ. L.DundasI.WongS. Y. S.FischerR. (2020). The cross-cultural validity of the Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire across 16 countries. Mindfulness, 11, 1226–1237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01333-6
KubyA. K.McLeanN.AllenK. (2015). Validation of the child and adolescent mindfulness measure (CAMM) with non-clinical adolescents. Mindfulness, 6(6), 1448–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0418-3
46.
LauN. S.HueM. T. (2011). Preliminary outcomes of a mindfulness-based programme for Hong Kong adolescents in schools: Well-being, stress and depressive symptoms. International Journal of Children's Spirituality, 16(4), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364436X.2011.639747
47.
LawlorM. S.Schonert-ReichlK. A.GadermannA. M.ZumboB. D. (2014). A validation study of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale adapted for children. Mindfulness, 5(6), 730–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0228-4
48.
LinehanM. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. Guilford Press.
49.
LiuX.ChiX.ZhangJ.DuanW.WenZ. (2019). Validation of child and adolescent mindfulness measure (CAMM) in Chinese adolescents. Psychological Exploration, 39(3), 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0418-3
50.
López-NicolásR.Rubio-AparicioM.López-IbáñezC.Sánchez-MecaJ. (2021). A reliability generalization meta-analysis of the dimensional obsessive-compulsive scale. Psicothema, 33(3), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2020.455
51.
MacaskillP.WalterS. D.IrwigL. (2001). A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 20(4), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.698
52.
MendelsonT.GreenbergM. T.DariotisJ. K.GouldL. F.RhoadesB. L.LeafP. J. (2010). Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a school-based mindfulness intervention for urban youth. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(7), 985–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9418-x
53.
MezoP. G.HercH. C.PritchardK. J.BullockW. A. (2020). Evaluation and a proposed revision of the CAMM among underrepresented elementary school children. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 45(3), 235–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508419845465
54.
MohsenabadiH.ShabaniM. J.AssarianF.ZanjaniZ. (2020). Psychometric properties of the child and adolescent mindfulness measure: A psychological measure of mindfulness in youth. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 14(1), e79986. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs.79986
55.
OrwinR. G. (1983). A fail-SafeN for effect size in meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8(2), 157–159. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164923
56.
PallozziR.WertheimE.PaxtonS.OngB. (2017). Trait mindfulness measures for use with adolescents: A systematic review. Mindfulness, 8(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0567-z
57.
PiquerasJ. A.Martín-VivarM.SandinB.San LuisC.PinedaD. (2017). The revised child anxiety and depression scale: A systematic review and reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 218, 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.022
58.
QuachD.Jastrowski ManoK. E.AlexanderK. (2016). A randomized controlled trial examining the effect of mindfulness meditation on working memory capacity in adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 58(5), 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.09.024
59.
RouxB.FranckxA.-C.LahayeM.DeplusS.PhilippotP. (2019). A French validation of the child and adolescent mindfulness measure (CAMM). European Review of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2019.06.001
60.
SagginoA.BartocciniA.SergiM. R.RomanelliR.MacchiaA.TommasiM. (2017). Assessing mindfulness on samples of Italian children and adolescents: The validation of the Italian version of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure. Mindfulness, 8(5), 1364–1372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0712-3
61.
Sánchez-MecaJ.López-LópezJ. A.López-PinaJ. A. (2013). Some recommended statistical analytic practices when reliability generalization studies are conducted. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66(3), 402–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02057.x
62.
Sánchez-MecaJ.Marín-MartínezF.López-LópezJ. A.Núñez-NúñezR. M.Rubio-AparicioM.López-GarcíaJ. J.López-PinaJ. A.Blázquez-RincónD. M.López-IbáñezC.López-NicolásR. (2021). Improving the reporting quality of reliability generalization meta-analyses: The REGEMA checklist. Research Synthesis Methods, 12(4), 516–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1487
63.
Sandoval LentiscoA.López NicolásR.López LópezJ. A.Sánchez MecaJ. (2023). Florida obsessive compulsive inventory and children's Florida obsessive compulsive inventory: A reliability generalization meta analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 79(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23416
64.
SantrockJ. W. (2006). Life-span development (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
65.
ScainiS.BattagliaM.BeidelD. C.OgliariA. (2012). A meta-analysis of the cross-cultural psychometric properties of the social phobia and anxiety inventory for children (SPAI-C). Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26(1), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.11.002
66.
SegalZ.WilliamsM.TeasdaleJ. (2018). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression. Guilford Publications.
67.
SenS. (2022). A reliability generalization meta-analysis of runco ideational behavior scale. Creativity Research Journal, 34(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.1960719
68.
SiegelR. D. (2009). The mindfulness solution: Everyday practices for everyday problems. Guilford Press.
69.
SterneJ. A.EggerM. (2005). Regression methods to detect publication and other bias in meta analysis. Regression methods to detect publication and other bias in meta analysis (pp. 99–110). Publication bias in meta analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments.
70.
SunS.WangS. (2015). The children's depression inventory in worldwide child development research: A reliability generalization study. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(8), 2352–2363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0038-x
71.
TangR.TangT. S. (2020). Theoretical frameworks of individual differences in interventions. The Neuroscience of Meditation, 11, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00818
72.
TeasdaleJ. D.SegalZ. V.WilliamsJ. M.RidgewayV. A.SoulsbyJ. M.LauM. A. (2000). Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(4), 615–623. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.68.4.615
73.
TheofanousA.IoannouM.ZachariaM.GeorgiouS. N.KareklaM. (2020). Gender, age, and time invariance of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) and psychometric properties in three Greek-speaking youth samples. Mindfulness, 11(5), 1298–1307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01350-5
74.
ThiermannU. B.SheateW. R. (2021). The way forward in mindfulness and sustainability: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 5(1), 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-020-00180-6
75.
Vacha-HaaseT. (1998). Reliability generalization: Exploring variance in measurement error affecting score reliability across studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164498058001002
76.
VicentM.Rubio-AparicioM.Sánchez-MecaJ.GonzálvezC. (2019). A reliability generalization meta-analysis of the child and adolescent perfectionism scale. Journal of Affective Disorders, 245, 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.049
77.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
78.
ViñasF.MaloS.GonzálezM.NavarroD.CasasF. (2015). Assessing mindfulness on a sample of Catalan-speaking Spanish adolescents: Validation of the Catalan version of the child and adolescent mindfulness measure. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18(E46), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2015.48
79.
ZennerC.Herrnleben-KurzS.WalachH. (2014). Mindfulness-based interventions in schools–a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 603. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00603
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
