Letter to the Editor: The (Mis)use of Performance Quartiles in Metacognition and Face Perception: A Comment on Zhou and Jenkins (2020) and Estudillo and Wong (2021)

Altman D. G. Royston P. (2006). The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. BMJ, 332(7549), 1080. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1080

Anson I. G. (2018). Partisanship, political knowledge, and the Dunning-Kruger effect. Political Psychology, 39(5), 1173–1192. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12490

Aqueveque C. (2018). Ignorant experts and erudite novices: Exploring the Dunning-Kruger effect in wine consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 65, 181–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.12.007

Bobak A. K. Mileva V. R. Hancock P. J. (2019). Facing the facts: Naive participants have only moderate insight into their face recognition and face perception abilities. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 872–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818776145

Burson K. A. Larrick R. P. Klayman J. (2006). Skilled or unskilled, but still unaware of it: How perceptions of difficulty drive miscalibration in relative comparisons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.60

Campbell D. T. Kenny D. A. (2002). A primer on regression artifacts. Guilford Press.

Dunning D. (2011). The Dunning–Kruger effect: On being ignorant of one’s own ignorance. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 247–296.

Estudillo A. J. Wong H. K. (2021). Associations between self-reported and objective face recognition abilities are only evident in above- and below-average recognisers. PeerJ, 9, e10629. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10629

Fleming S. M. Lau H. C. (2014). How to measure metacognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 443. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00443

Gignac G. E. Zajenkowski M. (2020). The Dunning-Kruger effect is (mostly) a statistical artefact: Valid approaches to testing the hypothesis with individual differences data. Intelligence, 80, 101449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2020.101449

Goodwin L. D. Leech N. L. (2006). Understanding correlation: Factors that affect the size of r. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(3), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.3200/jexe.74.3.249-266

Grabman J. H. Dodson C. S. (2022). Unskilled, underperforming, or unaware? Testing three accounts of individual differences in metacognitive monitoring sensitivity. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21924.35208

Gray K. L. Bird G. Cook R. (2017). Robust associations between the 20-item prosopagnosia index and the Cambridge face memory test in the general population. Royal Society Open Science, 4(3), 160923. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160923

Greitemeyer T. (2020). Unattractive people are unaware of their (un)attractiveness. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 61(4), 471–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12631

Kramer R. S. S. (2023). Face matching and metacognition: Investigating individual differences and a training intervention. PeerJ, 11, e14821. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14821

Kramer R. S. S. Gous G. Mireku M. O. Ward R. (2022). Metacognition during unfamiliar face matching. British Journal of Psychology, 113(3), 696–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12553

Kruger J. Dunning D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.77.6.1121

Lyons B. A. Montgomery J. M. Guess A. M. Nyhan B. Reifler J. (2021). Overconfidence in news judgments is associated with false news susceptibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(23), e2019527118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2019527118

MacCallum R. C. Zhang S. Preacher K. J. Rucker D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.19

Magnus J. R. Peresetsky A. A. (2022). A statistical explanation of the Dunning–Kruger effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 840180. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840180

Matsuyoshi D. Watanabe K. (2021). People have modest, not good, insight into their face recognition ability: A comparison between self-report questionnaires. Psychological Research, 85(4), 1713–1723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01355-8

McClelland G. H. Lynch J. G. Jr. Irwin J. R. Spiller S. A. Fitzsimons G. J. (2015). Median splits, type II errors, and false–positive consumer psychology: Don’t fight the power. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(4), 679–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2015.05.006

McIntosh R. D. Della Sala S. (2022). The persistent irony of the Dunning-Kruger effect. The Psychologist, 35(3), 30–34.

McIntosh R. D. Fowler E. A. Lyu T. Della Sala S. (2019). Wise up: Clarifying the role of metacognition in the Dunning-Kruger effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 148(11), 1882–1897. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000579

McIntosh R. D. Moore A. B. Liu Y. Della Sala S. (2022). Skill and self-knowledge: Empirical refutation of the dual-burden account of the Dunning–Kruger effect. Royal Society Open Science, 9(12), 191727. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191727

McKone E. Stokes S. Liu J. Cohan S. Fiorentini C. Pidcock M. Yovel G. Broughton M. Pelleg M. (2012). A robust method of measuring other-race and other-ethnicity effects: The Cambridge face memory test format. PLoS One, 7(10), e47956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047956

Nuhfer E. Cogan C. Fleisher S. Gaze E. Wirth K. (2016). Random number simulations reveal how random noise affects the measurements and graphical portrayals of self-assessed competency. Numeracy, 9(1), 4.

Nuhfer E. Fleisher S. Cogan C. Wirth K. Gaze E. (2017). How random noise and a graphical convention subverted behavioral scientists’ explanations of self-assessment data: Numeracy underlies better alternatives. Numeracy, 10(1), 4.

Pennycook G. Ross R. M. Koehler D. J. Fugelsang J. A. (2017). Dunning–Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24(6), 1774–1784. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1242-7

Sackett P. R. Yang H. (2000). Correction for range restriction: An expanded typology. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.112

Shah P. Gaule A. Sowden S. Bird G. Cook R. (2015). The 20-item prosopagnosia index (PI20): A self-report instrument for identifying developmental prosopagnosia. Royal Society Open Science, 2(6), 140343. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140343

Shah P. Sowden S. Gaule A. Catmur C. Bird G. (2015). The 20 item prosopagnosia index (PI20): Relationship with the Glasgow face-matching test. Royal Society Open Science, 2(11), 150305. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150305

Zhou X. Jenkins R. (2020). Dunning-Kruger effects in face perception. Cognition, 203, 104345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104345