Humor use in communication is considered an important factor that affects relationship satisfaction according to past studies. However, there is insufficient evidence on how humor influences marital satisfaction at the couple level. This study aimed to classify couples into clusters with different humor types based on their humor styles and to investigate whether the humor styles of husbands and wives influence marital satisfaction. In total, 170 couples completed a humor style and marital satisfaction inventory by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with grouping the data of their humor styles and using cluster analysis to determine whether there were differences in marital satisfaction among couples with different humor types. The results revealed five humor types for the couples: “positive humor couples,” “aggressive husband and self-defeating wife,” “humor denier husband and general humor wife,” “general humor husband and humor denier wife” and “humor denier couples.” The ANCOVA results indicate that the highest marital satisfaction occurs among couples with positive humor and the lowest is among couples with denier humor. This study illustrates the humor types that likely occur among couples and concludes that marital satisfaction is high when both partners use positive humor and low when neither partner uses humor.
AnsellE. B.KurtzJ. E.MarkeyP. M. (2008). Gender differences in interpersonal complementarity within roommate dyads. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 502–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207312312
2.
BanduraA.WaltersR. H. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
3.
BaucomB. R.EldridgeK. (2013). Marital communication. In VangelistiA. (Ed.), Handbook of family communication (2nd ed., pp. 65–79). Routledge.
4.
BowenG. L.KilpatrickA. C. (1995). Marriage/partners. In EdwardsR. L.HoppsJ. G. (Eds.), 19th Encyclopedia of social work (pp. 1663–1672). National Association of Social Workers.
5.
BresslerE. R.MartinR. A.BalshineS. (2006). Production and appreciation of humor as sexually selected traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.09.001
6.
BurkW. J.Seiffge-KrenkeI. (2015). One-sided and mutually aggressive couples: Differences in attachment, conflict prevalence, and coping. Child Abuse and Neglect, 50, 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.08.011
7.
CairdS.MartinR. A. (2014). Relationship-focused humor styles and relationship satisfaction in dating couples: A repeated-measures design. Humor, 27(2), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-0015
8.
CampbellL.MartinR. A.WardJ. R. (2008). An observational study of humor use while resolving conflict in dating couples. Personal Relationships, 15(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00183.x
9.
CannA.CalhounL. G. (2001). Perceived personality associations with differences in sense of humor: Stereotypes of hypothetical others with high or low senses of humor. Humor–International Journal of Humor Research, 14(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.14.2.117
10.
CannA.DavisH. B.ZapataC. L. (2011). Humor styles and relationship satisfaction in dating couples: Perceived versus self-reported humor styles as predictors of satisfaction. Humor-International Journal of Humor Research, 24(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2011.001
11.
CannA.MatsonC. (2014). Sense of humor and social desirability: Understanding how humor styles are perceived. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.029
12.
ChenG. H.WatkinsD.MartinR. A. (2013). Sense of humor in China: The role of individualism, collectivism, and facework. Psychologia, 56(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.2117/psysoc.2013.57
De KoningE.WeissR. L. (2002). The relational humor inventory: Functions of humor in close relationships. American Journal of Family Therapy, 30(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/019261802753455615
15.
DildarS.SitwatA.YasinS. (2013). Intimate enemies: Marital conflicts and conflict resolution styles in dissatisfied married couples. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 15(10), 1433–1439. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.15.10.11581
16.
DryerD. C.HorowitzL. M. (1997). When do opposites attract? Interpersonal complementarity versus similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 592–603. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.592
17.
GallowayG. (2010). Individual differences in personal humor styles: Identification of prominent patterns and their associates. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(5), 563–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.12.007
18.
GaoG. (1998). An initial analysis of the effects of face and concern for “other” in Chinese interpersonal communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(4), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00019-4
19.
GormanG.JordanC. H. (2015). I know you're kidding”: Relationship closeness enhances positive perceptions of teasing. Personal Relationships, 22(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12071
20.
GottmanJ. (2018). The seven principles for making marriage work.
21.
GottmanJ. M.CoanJ.CarrereS.SwansonC. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/353438
22.
GottmanJ. M.KrokoffL. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.57.1.47
23.
HahlwegK.MarkmanH. J.ThurmaierF.EnglJ.EckertV. (1998). Prevention of marital distress: Results of a German prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 12(4), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.12.4.543
24.
HahnC. M.CampbellL. J. (2016). Birds of a feather laugh together: An investigation of humour style similarity in married couples. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 12(3), 406–419. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v12i3.1115
25.
HallJ. A. (2013). Humor in long-term romantic relationships: The association of general humor styles and relationship-specific functions with relationship satisfaction. Western Journal of Communication, 77(3), 272–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2012.757796
26.
HallJ. A. (2017). Humor in romantic relationships: A meta-analysis. Personal Relationships, 24(2), 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12183
27.
HaynesS. N.FloydF. J.LemskyC.RogersE.WinemillerD.HeilmanN.WerleM.MurphyT.CardoneL. (1992). The marital satisfaction questionnaire for older persons. Psychological Assessment, 4(4), 473–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.4.473
28.
HeaveyC. L.LayneC.ChristensenA. (1993). Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: A replication and extension. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.1.16
29.
HeintzS. (2017). Putting a spotlight on daily humor behaviors: Dimensionality and relationships with personality, subjective well-being, and humor styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 407–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.042
30.
HoneL. S.HurwitzW.LiebermanD. (2015). Sex differences in preferences for humor: A replication, modification, and extension. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(1), 147470491501300110. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491501300110
JacksonG. L.KrullJ. L.BradburyT. N.KarneyB. R. (2017). Household income and trajectories of marital satisfaction in early marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(3), 690–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12394
33.
JacksonJ. B.MillerR. B.OkaM.HenryR. G. (2014). Gender differences in marital satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(1), 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12077
JouY. H. (2020). Effect of power source and conflict coping strategy on marital relationships. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 62(3), 391–420. https://doi.org/10.6129/CJP.202009_62(3).0003
36.
LefcourtH. M. (2001). The humor solution. In SnyderC. R. (Ed.), Coping with stress: Effective people and processes (pp. 68–92). Oxford University Press.
37.
LonardoR. A.GiordanoP. C.LongmoreM. A.ManningW. D. (2009). Parents, friends, and romantic partners: Enmeshment in deviant networks and adolescent delinquency involvement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9333-4
38.
MartinR. A.FordT. (2018). The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Academic Press.
39.
MartinR. A.LefcourtH. M. (1983). Sense of humor as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(6), 1313–1324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.6.1313
40.
MartinR. A.Puhlik-DorisP.LarsenG.GrayJ.WeirK. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2
41.
McCubbinH.OlsonD. H.PattersonJ. M. (1983). Beyond family crisis: Family adaptation. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 1(1), 73–93.
42.
MundM.FinnC.HagemeyerB.ZimmermannJ.NeyerF. J. (2015). The dynamics of self–esteem in partner relationships. European Journal of Personality, 29(2), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1984
43.
OlsonDHDeFrainJ.SkograndL. (2011). Marriages and families: Intimacy, diversity, and strengths (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
44.
OverallN. C.FletcherG. J.SimpsonJ. A.SibleyC. G. (2009). Regulating partners in intimate relationships: The costs and benefits of different communication strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 620–639. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012961
45.
PlessenC. Y.FrankenF. R.SterC.SchmidR. R.WolfmayrC.MayerA. M.SobischM.KathoferM.RattnerK.KotlyarE.MaierwieserR. J.TranU. S. (2020). Humor styles and personality: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the relations between humor styles and the big five personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 154, 109676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109676
46.
PriestR. F.TheinM. T. (2003). Humor appreciation in marriage: Spousal similarity, assortative mating, and disaffection. Humor, 16(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2003.005
47.
RuchW. (Ed.) (2010). The sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic (3). Walter de Gruyter.
48.
RuchW.HeintzS. (2013). Humour styles, personality and psychological well-being: What’s humour got to do with it?The European Journal of Humour Research, 1(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.7592/EJHR2013.1.4.ruch
49.
RuchW.HeintzS.PlattT.WagnerL.ProyerR. T. (2018). Broadening humor: Comic styles differentially tap into temperament, character, and ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00006
50.
SaroglouV.LacourC.DemeureM. E. (2010). Bad humor, bad marriage: Humor styles in divorced and married couples. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 6(3), 94–121. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v6i3.210
51.
SayehmiriK.KareemK. I.AbdiK.DalvandS.GheshlaghR. G. (2020). The relationship between personality traits and marital satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychology, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-0383-z
SorokowskiP.RandallA. K.GroyeckaA.FrackowiakT.CantareroK.HilpertP.AhmadiK.AlghraibehA. M.AryeeteyR.BertoniA.BettacheK.BłażejewskaM.BodenmannG.BortoliniT. S.BoscC.ButovskayaM.CastroF. N.CetinkayaH.CunhaD.SorokowskaA. (2017). Marital satisfaction, sex, age, marriage duration, religion, number of children, economic status, education, and collectivistic values: Data from 33 countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1199. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01199
54.
TaylorS. E.KleinL. C.LewisB. P.GruenewaldT. L.GurungR. A.UpdegraffJ. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: Tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological Review, 107(3), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.411
55.
WeisfeldG. E. (2017). Humor in marriage. In WeisfeldC. C.WeisfeldG. E.DillonL. M. (Eds.), The psychology of marriage: An evolutionary and cross-cultural view (pp. 237–250). Lexington Books. https://doi.org/10.26613/esic.3.2.156
56.
WhitemanS. D.JensenA. C.MaggsJ. L. (2014). Similarities and differences in adolescent siblings’ alcohol-related attitudes, use, and delinquency: Evidence for convergent and divergent influence processes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(5), 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9971-z
57.
WiltJ.RevelleW. (2015). Affect, behaviour, cognition and desire in the big five: An analysis of item content and structure. European Journal of Personality, 29(4), 478–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2002
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
