Reciprocity versus Self-Interest in a Competitive Interaction Context: An Experimental Study

Abstract

In social interactions, the reciprocity norm implies to adjust one’s behavior to that of the other agents. Conversely, behaving according to self-interest involves taking into account the reciprocity principle only if it does not hinder the achievement of one’s goals. However, reciprocity and self-interest may conflict with each other, as when returning a kind action involves sacrificing the possibility to achieve a personal objective. The conflict could be exacerbated by some contextual factors, such as competitive pressures. This study investigated, in a competitive interaction context, which principle prevails when the two conflict. To this end, 276 unpaid participants (M = 138) took part in a two-stage experiment entailing a simulated interaction with a fictitious opponent, which behaved selfishly, fairly or altruistically toward them during the first stage. Participants had to decide whether or not to reciprocate the opponent’s previous behavior, which in the critical experimental conditions conflicted with the goal to successfully complete the experiment. So, they were faced with a moral dilemma. Competition degree was manipulated to make the conflict between reciprocity and self-interest more or less harsh. Moreover, we tested whether the putative effect of experimental manipulation was mediated by changes in context-related affective states and personal beliefs about morality. Results showed that decision-making was principally influenced by reciprocity. Regardless of the competition degree, participants preferred to engage in reciprocal behavior even when this compromised their personal interest. Affective states and beliefs changed in response to the experimental manipulation, but they did not mediate the effect of the independent variable on decision-making.

Keywords

Reciprocity self-interest moral decision-making competition affective states moral beliefs

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Axelrod

(1980). Effective choice in the Prisoner’s dilemma. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200278002400101

Axelrod

Hamilton

(1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211(4489), 1390–1396. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7466396

Baumeister

R. F.

Vohs

K. D.

Nathan DeWall

Zhang

(2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 167–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307301033

Becker

(1976). The economic approach to human behavior. The University of Chicago Press.

Ben-Ner

Putterman

Kong

Magan

(2004). Reciprocity in a two-part dictator game. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 53(3), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2002.12.001

Berg

Dickhaut

McCabe

(1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1995.1027

Bless

Fiedler

(2006). Mood and the regulation of information processing and behavior. In: Forgas

J. P.

(Ed.), Hearts and minds: Affective influences on social cognition and behaviour (pp. 65–84). Psychology Press.

Boudon

(1989). Subjective rationality and the explanation of social behavior. Rationality and Society, 1(2), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463189001002002

Burns

T. R.

Baumgartner

DeVille

(1985). Man, decisions, and society. Gordon & Breach.

10.

Chao

(2018). Intentions-based reciprocity to monetary and non-monetary gifts. Games, 9(4), Article 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/g9040074

11.

Curry

O. S.

(2016). Morality as cooperation: A problem-centred approach. In Shackelford

T. K.

Hansen

R. D.

(Eds.), The evolution of morality (pp. 27–51). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19671-8_2

12.

DeSteno

Bartlett

M. Y.

Baumann

Williams

L. A.

Dickens

(2010). Gratitude as moral sentiment: Emotion-guided cooperation in economic exchange. Emotion, 10(2), 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017883

13.

Diederich

(2003). Decision making under conflict: Decision time as a measure of conflict strength. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(1), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196481

14.

Diekmann

(2004). The power of reciprocity. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48(4), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002704265948

15.

Downs

(1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1086/257897

16.

Engelmann

Strobel

(2010). Inequality aversion and reciprocity in moonlighting games. Games, 1(4), 459–477. https://doi.org/10.3390/g1040459

17.

Ewoldsen

D. R.

Eno

C. A.

Okdie

B. M.

Velez

J. A.

Guadagno

R. E.

DeCoster

(2012). Effect of playing violent video games cooperatively or competitively on subsequent cooperative behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(5), 277–280. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0308

18.

Falk

Fehr

Fischbacher

(2008). Testing theories of fairness—intentions matter, games and economic behavior, testing theories of fairness-intentions matter. Games and Economic Behavior, 62(1), 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2007.06.001

19.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A.-G.

Buchner

(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146

20.

Fehr

Camerer

(2007). Social neuroeconomics: The neural circuitry of social preferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(10), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.002

21.

Flood

M. M.

(1952). Some experimental games-Research memorandum. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/RM789-1.html

22.

Forgas

J. P.

(1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39

23.

Forgas

J. P.

(2016). Affective influences on moral decisions: Mood effects on selfishness versus fairness. In Forgas

J. P.

Jussim

Van Lange

P. A. M.

(Eds.), The social psychology of morality (pp. 152–170). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315644189-10

24.

Forgas

J. P.

(2017). Mood effects on cognition: Affective influences on the content and process of information processing and behavior. In Jeon

(Ed.), Emotions and affect in human factors and human-computer interaction (pp. 89–122). Academic Press, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801851-4.00003-3

25.

Forgas

J. P.

Bower

G. H.

(1987). Mood effects on person-perception judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.53

26.

Forgas

J. P.

Tan

H. B.

(2013). To give or to keep? Affective influences on selfishness and fairness in computer-mediated interactions in the dictator game and the ultimatum game. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.017

27.

Gintis

Henrich

Bowles

Boyd

Fehr

(2008). Strong reciprocity and the roots of human morality. Social Justice Research, 21(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-008-0067-y

28.

Grant

A. M.

(2014). Give and take: A revolutionary approach to success. Phoenix / Orion Books.

29.

Greene

(2015). Beyond point-and-shoot morality: Why cognitive (Neuro)Science matters for ethics. The Law and Ethics of Human Rights, 9(2), 141–172. https://doi.org/10.1515/lehr-2015-0011

30.

Harsanyi

J. C.

(1977). Morality and the theory of rational behavior. Social Research, 44(4), 623–656.

31.

Hayes

A. F.

(2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100

32.

Homans

G. C.

(1961). Social behavior and its elementary forms. Harcourt, Brace & World.

33.

Howell

D. C.

(2007). The analysis of missing data. In Outhwaite

Turner

(Eds.), Handbook of social science methodology. Sage.

34.

Johnston

Krettenauer

(2011). Moral self and moral emotion expectancies as predictors of anti- and prosocial behaviour in adolescence: A case for mediation? European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8(2), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405621003619945

35.

Kaplan

Tivnan

(2014). Multiplicity of emotions in moral judgment and motivation. Ethics & Behavior, 24(6), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2014.888517

36.

Kjell

O. N. E.

Thompson

(2013). Exploring the impact of positive and negative emotions on cooperative behaviour in a Prisoner’s Dilemma Game. PeerJ, 1, Article e231. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.231

37.

Korn

Böhm

Meier

N. W.

Betsch

(2020). Vaccination as a social contract. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(26), 14890–14899. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919666117

38.

Lerner

J. S.

Valdesolo

Kassam

K. S.

(2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 799–823. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043

39.

Liu

C.W.

Gao

Agarwal

(2018). Is it better to give than to receive? Leveraging digital social connections for healthy behavior. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3162223

40.

Markowsky

Beblo

(2022). When do we observe a gender gap in competition entry? A meta-analysis of the experimental literature. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 198, 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.03.030

41.

Martinez

L. F.

Jaeger

D. S.

(2016). Ethical decision making in counterfeit purchase situations: The influence of moral awareness and moral emotions on moral judgment and purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(3), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-04-2015-1394

42.

Mavin

Yusupova

(2020). Competition and gender: Time’s up on essentialist knowledge production. Management Learning, 52(1), 86–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507620950176

43.

Molm

(2010). The structure of reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272510369079

44.

Niederle

Vesterlund

(2011). Gender and competition. Annual Review of Economics, 3(1), 601–630. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-111809-125122

45.

Nowak

M. A.

(2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science (New York, N.Y.), 314(5805), 1560–1563. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133755

46.

Piest

Schreck

(2020). Contests and unethical behavior in organizations: A review and synthesis of the empirical literature. Management Review Quarterly, 71(4), 679–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00197-3

47.

Proserpio

Zervas

(2018). You get what you give: Theory and evidence of reciprocity in the sharing economy. Quantitative Marketing and Economics 16(4), 371–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-018-9201-9

48.

Ricker

(1962). The theory of political coalitions. Yale University Press.

49.

Roseman

I. J.

(2008). Motivations and emotivations: Approach, avoidance, and other tendencies in motivated and emotional behavior. In Elliot

A. J.

(Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 343–366). Psychology Press.

50.

Sanfey

(2007). Social decision-making: Insights from game theory and neuroscience. Science, 318(5850), 598–602. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1142996

51.

Scherer

K. R.

(1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In Scherer

K. R.

Ekman

P. E.

(Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293–317). Erlbaum.

52.

Scherer

K. R.

(2000). Psychological models of emotion. In Borod

J. C.

, (Ed.), The neuropsychology of emotion (pp. 137–162). Oxford University Press.

53.

Schmidt

K. M.

(2011). Social preferences and competition. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 43, 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00415.x

54.

Schotter

Weiss

Zapater

(1996). Fairness and survival in ultimatum and dictatorship games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 31(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2681(96)00863-3

55.

Schwarz

(1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In Higgins

E. T.

Sorrentino

(Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior. (pp. 527–561). Guilford.

56.

Schwarz

(2012). Feelings-as-information theory. In Van Lange

P. A. M.

Kruglanski

A. W.

Higgins

E. T.

(Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289–308). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n15

57.

Schwarz

Clore

(1988). How do I feel about it? Informative functions of affective states. In Fiedler

Forgas

(Eds.), Affect, cognition and social behavior (pp. 44–62). Hogrefe International.

58.

Schwarz

Clore

G. L.

(2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry, 14(3-4), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1403&4_20

59.

Shurchkov

Eckel

C. C.

(2017). Gender differences in behavioral traits and labor market outcomes. In The Oxford Handbook of Women and the Economy.

60.

Sterelny

Fraser

(2017). Evolution and moral realism. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 68(4), 981–1006. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axv060

61.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

Ullman

J. B.

(2007). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson.

62.

Tasso

Sarlo

Lotto

(2017). Emotions associated with counterfactual comparisons drive decision-making in Footbridge-type moral dilemmas. Motivation and Emotion, 41(3), 410–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9607-9

63.

Tomasello

Vaish

(2013). Origins of human cooperation and morality. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143812

64.

Trivers

(1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/406755

65.

van Dijk

De Dreu

C. K. W.

(2020). Experimental games and social decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-081420-110718

66.

Wang

Kong

Nie

Shang

Maguire

(2020). The effects of emotion and social consensus on moral decision-making. Ethics & Behavior, 31(8), 575–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2020.1830404

67.

Weiner

(2014). The attribution approach to emotion and motivation: History, hypotheses, home runs, headaches/heartaches. Emotion Review, 6(4), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914534502

68.

Zeelenberg

Nelissen

R. M. A.

Breugelmans

S. M.

Pieters

(2008). On emotion specificity in decision making: Why feeling is for doing. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(1), 18–27.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.26 MB