This study proposes and tests a theoretical model of how two types of stressors (challenge and hindrance stressors) elicit perseverative cognition processes in individuals (as characterized by two types of work-related rumination), and how, through this mechanism, these stressors can further affect individuals’ flow experience at work. Our model is largely supported by structural equation modeling analyses of a longitudinal questionnaire-based survey (n = 344). We find that challenge stressors have a significant, positive, direct impact on the experience of flow. Additionally, both challenge and hindrance stressors simultaneously activate problem-solving pondering and affective rumination in employees; affective rumination inhibits flow, while problem-solving pondering promotes flow. The results of a bootstrap sampling analysis further indicate the presence of the masking and mediating effects of work-related rumination in the effects of these stressors on flow experience. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
AubéC.RousseauV.BrunelleE. (2018). Flow experience in teams: The role of shared leadership. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(2), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000071
2.
AustF.BenekeT.PeiferC.WekenborgM. (2022). The relationship between flow experience and burnout symptoms: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7), 3865. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19073865
3.
BakkerA. B. (2008). The work-related flow inventory: Construction and initial validation of the WOLF. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(3), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.007
4.
BakkerA. B.van WoerkomM. (2017). Flow at work: A self-determination perspective. Occupational Health Science, 1(1-2), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-017-0003-3
5.
BrosschotJ. F.GerinW.ThayerJ. F. (2006). The perseverative cognition hypothesis: A review of worry, prolonged stress-related physiological activation, and health. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 60(2), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.06.074
6.
CalderwoodC.BennettA. A.GabrielA. S.TrougakosJ. P.DahlingJ. J. (2018). Too anxious to help? Off-job affective rumination as a linking mechanism between work anxiety and helping. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91(3), 681–687. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12220
7.
CarpentierJ.MageauG. A.VallerandR. J. (2012). Ruminations and flow: Why do people with a more harmonious passion experience higher well-being?Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(3), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9276-4
8.
CavanaughM. A.BoswellW. R.RoehlingM. V.BoudreauJ. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65
9.
CropleyM.ZijlstraF. R. H. (2011). Work and rumination. In Langan-FoxJ.CooperC. L. (Eds.), Handbook of stress in the occupations (pp. 487–501). Edward Elgar Publishing.
10.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. CA Jossey-Bass.
11.
DebusM. E.SonnentagS.DeutschW.NussbeckF. W. (2014). Making flow happen: The effects of being recovered on work-related flow between and within days. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 713–722. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035881
12.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.SonnentagS.FullagarC. J. (2012). Work-related flow and energy at work and at home: A study on the role of daily recovery. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.760
13.
DemskyC. A.FritzC.HammerL. B.BlackA. E. (2019). Workplace incivility and employee sleep: The role of rumination and recovery experiences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 24(2), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000116
14.
ElizurD.BorgI.HuntR.BeckI. M. (1991). The structure of work values: A cross cultural comparison. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030120103
15.
EngeserS.BaumannN. (2016). Fluctuation of flow and affect in everyday life: A second look at the paradox of work. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(1), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9586-4
16.
FagerlindA. C.GustavssonM.JohanssonG.EkbergK. (2013). Experience of work-related flow: Does high decision latitude enhance benefits gained from job resources?Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(2), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.03.010
17.
FengX. (2022). Calm down and enjoy it: Influence of leader-employee mindfulness on flow experience. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 839–854. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S360880
18.
FinneranC. M.ZhangP. (2003). A person–artefact–task (PAT) model of flow antecedents in computer-mediated environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 475–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00112-5
19.
FredricksonB. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.56.3.218
20.
FritzC.SonnentagS. (2005). Recovery, health, and job performance: Effects of weekend experiences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(3), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.10.3.187
21.
FroneM. R. (2015). Relations of negative and positive work experiences to employee alcohol use: Testing the intervening role of negative and positive work rumination. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(2), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038375
22.
GalpinT.WhittingtonJ. L.BellG. (2012). Leading the sustainable organization. Routledge.
23.
GoodD. J.LyddyC. J.GlombT. M.BonoJ. E.BrownK. W.DuffyM. K.BaerR. A.BrewerJ. A.LazarS. W. (2016). Contemplating mindfulness at work. Journal of Management, 42(1), 114–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315617003
24.
HobfollS. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.44.3.513
25.
JunkerN. M.BaumeisterR. F.StraubK.GreenhausJ. H. (2021). When forgetting what happened at work matters: The role of affective rumination, problem-solving pondering, and self-control in work–family conflict and enrichment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(11), 1750–1766. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000847
26.
KinnunenU.FeldtT.BloomJ. (2019). Testing cross-lagged relationships between work-related rumination and well-being at work in a three-wave longitudinal study across 1 and 2 years. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(3), 645–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12256
27.
KinnunenU.FeldtT.SianojaM.de BloomJ.KorpelaK.GeurtsS. (2017). Identifying long-term patterns of work-related rumination: Associations with job demands and well-being outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(4), 514–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2017.1314265
28.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
29.
LepineJ. A.PodsakoffN. P.LepineM. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor–hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 764–775. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803921
30.
LepineM. A.ZhangY.CrawfordE. R.RichB. L. (2016). Turning their pain to gain: Charismatic leader influence on follower stress appraisal and job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 1036–1059. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0778
31.
LiangH.ChenC.LiF.WuS.WangL.ZhengX.ZengB. (2018). Mediating effects of peace of mind and rumination on the relationship between gratitude and depression among Chinese university students. Current Psychology, 39(4), 1430–1437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9847-1
32.
MadridH. P.PattersonM. G.LeivaP. I. (2015). Negative core affect and employee silence: How differences in activation, cognitive rumination, and problem-solving demands matter. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1887–1898. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039380
33.
MazzolaJ. J.DisselhorstR. (2019). Should we be “challenging” employees? A critical review and meta-analysis of the challenge-hindrance model of stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(8), 949–961. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2412
34.
NakamuraJ.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2014). The concept of flow. Springer.
35.
NorsworthyC.JacksonB.DimmockJ. A. (2021). Advancing our understanding of psychological flow: A scoping review of conceptualizations, measurements, and applications. Psychological Bulletin, 147(8), 806–827. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000337
36.
O’BrienK. E.BeehrT. A. (2019). So far, so good: Up to now, the challenge–hindrance framework describes a practical and accurate distinction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(8), 962–972. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2405
37.
PearsallM. J.EllisA. P. J.SteinJ. H. (2009). Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.02.002
38.
PeiferC.PollakA.FlakO.PyszkaA.NisarM. A.IrshadM. T.GrzegorzekM.KordyakaB.KożusznikB. (2021). The symphony of team flow in virtual teams. Using artificial intelligence for its recognition and promotion. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 697093. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697093
39.
PeiferC.SchächingerH.EngeserS.AntoniC. H. (2015). Cortisol effects on flow-experience. Psychopharmacology, 232(6), 1165–1173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-014-3753-5
40.
PeiferC.SchulzA.SchächingerH.BaumannN.AntoniC. H. (2014). The relation of flow-experience and physiological arousal under stress — can u shape it?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53(2014), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.009
41.
PeiferC.SyrekC.OstwaldV.SchuhE.AntoniC. H. (2020). Thieves of flow: How unfinished tasks at work are related to flow experience and wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(5), 1641–1660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00149-z
42.
PeiferC.TanJ. (2021). The psychophysiology of flow experience. In PeiferC.EngeserS. (Eds.), Advances in flow research (pp. 191–230). Springer.
43.
PeiferC.WoltersG. (2021). Flow in the context of work. In PeiferC.EngeserS. (Eds.), Advances in flow research (pp. 287–321). Springer.
44.
PeiferC.ZippG. (2019). All at once? The effects of multitasking behavior on flow and subjective performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(5), 682–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2019.1647168
45.
ProbstT. M.GaileyN. J.JiangL.BohleS. L. (2017). Psychological capital: Buffering the longitudinal curvilinear effects of job insecurity on performance. Safety Science, 100, 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.02.002
46.
QuerstretD.CropleyM. (2012). Exploring the relationship between work-related rumination, sleep quality, and work-related fatigue. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(3), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028552
47.
RamseyJ. R.LorenzM. P. (2020). Every flow has its ebb: The impact of flow on work–family conflict and adjustment in global careers. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(3), 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12234
48.
RodellJ. B.JudgeT. A. (2009). Can “good” stressors spark “bad” behaviors? The mediating role of emotions in links of challenge and hindrance stressors with citizenship and counterproductive behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1438–1451. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016752
49.
ŠimlešaM.GueganJ.BlanchardE.Tarpin-BernardF.BuisineS. (2018). The flow engine framework: A cognitive model of optimal human experience. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 232–253. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i1.1370
50.
SonnentagS.ArbeusH.MahnC.FritzC. (2014). Exhaustion and lack of psychological detachment from work during off-job time: Moderator effects of time pressure and leisure experiences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(2), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035760
51.
SyrekC. J.WeigeltO.PeiferC.AntoniC. H. (2017). Zeigarnik’s sleepless nights: How unfinished tasks at the end of the week impair employee sleep on the weekend through rumination. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(2), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000031
52.
TozmanT.PeiferC. (2016). Experimental paradigms to investigate flow-experience and its psychophysiology: Inspired from stress theory and research. In HarmatL.AndersenF.UllenF., et al. (Eds.), Flow experience (pp. 329–350). Springer.
53.
TozmanT.ZhangY. Y.VollmeyerR. (2017). Inverted U-shaped function between flow and cortisol release during chess play. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(1), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9726-0
54.
TseD. C. K.FungH. H.NakamuraJ.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2016). Teamwork and flow proneness mitigate the negative effect of excess challenge on flow state. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(3), 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1257059
55.
VallerandR. J.MageauG. A.ElliotA. J.DumaisA.DemersM. A.RousseauF. (2008). Passion and performance attainment in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9(3), 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.05.003
56.
VandevalaT.PaveyL.ChelidoniO.ChangN.-F.Creagh-BrownB.CoxA. (2017). Psychological rumination and recovery from work in intensive care professionals: Associations with stress, burnout, depression and health. Journal of Intensive Care, 5(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-017-0209-0
57.
van OortmerssenL. A.CaniëlsM. C. J.van AssenM. F. (2020). Coping with work stressors and paving the way for flow: Challenge and hindrance demands, humor, and cynicism. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(6), 2257–2277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00177-9
58.
VeigaS. P. D. M.TurbanD. B. (2014). Are affect and perceived stress detrimental or beneficial to job seekers? The role of learning goal orientation in job search self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.09.007
59.
von HippelC.KalokerinosE. K.HaanteräK.ZacherH. (2019). Age-based stereotype threat and work outcomes: Stress appraisals and rumination as mediators. Psychology and Aging, 34(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000308
60.
WachD.StephanU.WeinbergerE.WeggeJ. (2021). Entrepreneurs’ stressors and well-being: A recovery perspective and diary study. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(5), 106016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106016
61.
WebsterJ. R.BeehrT. A.ChristiansenN. D. (2010). Toward a better understanding of the effects of hindrance and challenge stressors on work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.06.012
62.
WendscheJ.Lohmann-HaislahA. (2017). A meta-analysis on antecedents and outcomes of detachment from work. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2072. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02072
63.
WidmerP. S.SemmerN. K.KälinW.JacobshagenN.MeierL. L. (2012). The ambivalence of challenge stressors: Time pressure associated with both negative and positive well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 422–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.09.006
64.
ZhangJ.LiW.MaH.SmithA. P. (2021). Switch off totally or switch off strategically? The consequences of thinking about work on job performance. Psychological Reports, 124(6), 2721–2738. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120968080
65.
ZhangY.LepineJ. A.BuckmanB. R.WeiF. (2014). It’s not fair or is it? The role of justice and leadership in explaining work stressor–job performance relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3), 675–697. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.1110
