Significance of the Ontological/Utilitarian Distinction Among Measures of Individualism and Collectivism

Abstract

A meta-analysis reported in this article compared the effects of ontological and utilitarian measures of individualism and collectivism on the findings of published research. Ontological differences in individualism and collectivism concern the degree to which either individuals or collectivities are interpreted as the primary entities comprising social reality. Reflecting these differences are measures that include subjects such as the degree of permanence and sense of collective obligation associated with interpersonal, group, or community relationships. Utilitarian distinctions in individualism and collectivism involve beliefs that either individuals or collectivities are instrumental in the pursuit of valued outcomes. Related measures include items concerning the attractiveness or consequences of working alone versus working in a group. Results of the meta-analysis indicated that ontological and utilitarian measures have produced differing findings in several notable instances, with utilitarian measures producing larger effects.

Keywords

individualism/collectivism psychometrics measures and statistics,organizational culture organizational psychology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ajzen

Fishbein

(1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888-918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888.

Bellah

R. N.

Madsen

Sullivan

W. M.

Swidler

Tipton

S. M.

(1985). Habits of theheart: Individualism and commitment in American life. New York: Harper & Row.

Breer

P. E.

Locke

E. A.

(1965). Task experience as a source of attitudes. Homewood. IL: Dorsey.

Carpenter

(2000). Effects of cultural tightness and collectivism on self-concept and causalattributions. Cross-Cultural Research, 34(1), 38-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939710003400103.

Cochran

W. G.

Cox

G. M.

(1957). Experimental designs (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

Cohen

(1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Crampton

S. M.

Wagner

J. A.

III (1994). Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.1.67

Dorfman

P. W.

Howell

J. P.

(1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. Advances in International Comparative Management, 3(1), 127-150.

Drach-Zahavy

(2004). The proficiency trap: How to balance enriched job designs and the team’s need for support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(8), 979-996. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.284.

10.

Erez

Earley

P. C.

(1987). Comparative analysis of goal-setting strategies across cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4), 658–665. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.658

11.

Erez

Earley

P. C.

(1993). Culture, self-identity, and work. New York: Oxford University Press.

12.

Fisher

R. A.

(1935). The fiducial argument in statistical inference. Annals of Eugenics, 6(4), 391-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1935.tb02120.x.

13.

Gelfand

M. J.

Erez

Aycan

(2007). Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 479-514. https://doi.org/10.1146/annuerev.psych.58.110405.085559.

14.

Gibson

C. B.

Saxton

(2005). Thinking outside the black box: Outcomes of team decisions with third-party intervention. Small Group Research, 36(2), 208-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496404270376.

15.

Goncalo

J. A.

Staw

B. M.

(2006). Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(1), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.11.003

16.

Hofstede

(1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

17.

Hofstede

(2003). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions andorganizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

18.

Hofstede

G. H.

Hofstede

G. J.

Minkov

(2005) Software of the mind (p. 2). NewYork: McGraw-Hill.

19.

Hui

C. H.

(1988). Measurement of individualism-collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 22(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(88)90022-0

20.

Hunter

J. E.

Schmidt

F. L.

(1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

21.

Jackson

C. L.

Colquitt

J. A.

Wesson

M. J.

Zapata-Phelan

C. P.

(2006). Psychologicalcollectivism: A measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 884–899. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.884

22.

Kemmelmeier

(2003). Individualism and attitudes toward affirmative action: Evidence from priming experiments. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2502_2

23.

Kluckholn

Strodtbeck

(1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.

24.

Ling

Zhao

Baron

R.A.

(2007). Influence of founder-CEOs’ personal values on performance: Moderating effects of firm age and size. Journal of Management, 33(5), 673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307305564

25.

Marcus

(2013). Interactive effects of levels of individualism-collectivism on cooperation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(6), 813–834. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1875

26.

McCrae

R. R.

(2004). Human nature and culture: A trait perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2003.09.009

27.

Mead

(1967). Cooperation and competition among primitive people. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

28.

Oishi

Wyer

R. S.

Colcombe

S. J.

(2000). Cultural variation in the use of current life satisfaction to predict the future. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(3), 434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.434.

29.

Oyserman

Coon

H. M.

Kemmelmeier

(2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3

30.

Parsons

Shils

E. A.

(1951). Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

31.

Petty

R. E.

Cacioppo

J. T.

(1996). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and approaches. New York, NY: Routledge.

32.

Podsakoff

P. M.

MacKenzie

S. B.

Podsakoff

N. P.

(2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539-569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452.

33.

Rokeach

(1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

34.

Scheffé

(1970). Practical solutions of the Behrens-Fisher problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65(332), 1501-1508. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1970.10481179.

35.

Schmidt

F. L.

Hunter

J. L.

(2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Los Angeles: Sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205014.

36.

Singelis

T. M.

Triandis

H. C.

Bhawuk

D. P. S.

Gelfand

M. J.

(1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29(3), 240-275. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F106939719502900302.

37.

Taras

Sarala

Muchinsky

Kemmelmeier

Singelis

T. M.

Avsec

Coon

H. M.

Dinnel

D. L.

Gardner

Grace

Hardin

E. E.

Hsu

Johnson

Karakitapoğlu Aygün

Kashima

E. S.

Kolstad

Milfont

T. L.

Oetzel

Okazaki

Sinclair

H. C.

(2014). Opposite ends of the same stick? Multi-method test of the dimensionality of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(2), 213-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113509132.

38.

Triandis

(2019). Individualism and collectivism. New York: Routledge.

39.

Triandis

H. C.

(1971). Attitude and attitude change. New York: Wiley.

40.

Triandis

H. C.

(1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.506

41.

Triandis

H. C.

Bontempo

Villareal

M. J.

Asai

Lucca

(1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships. Individualism andcollectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.323.

42.

Triandis

H. C.

Gelfand

M. J.

(1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 118–128.

43.

Wagner

J. A.

III (1995). Studies of individualism-collectivism. Effects on Cooperation in Groups: Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 280-304. https://doi.org/10.5465/256731.

44.

Wagner

J. A.

III (2002). Utilitarian and ontological variation in individualism-collectivism. Research in Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 301-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(02)24009-5.

45.

Wagner

J. A.

III Humphrey

S. E.

Meyer

C. J.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

(2012). Individualism-collectivism and team member performance: Another look. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(7), 946-963. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.783.

46.

Wagner

J. A.

Moch

M. K.

(1986). Individualism-collectivism: Concept and measure. Group & Organization Studies, 11(3), 280-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960118601100309.

47.

Wheeler

Reis

H. T.

Bond

M. H.

(1989). Collectivism-individualism in everyday social life: The middle kingdom and the melting pot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(1), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.1.79.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.44 MB