Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Preventive Measures are Shaped Predominantly by Conspiracy Beliefs,Mistrust in Science and Fear – A Comparison of More than 20 Psychological Variables
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2023
Acceptance and Adherence to COVID-19 Preventive Measures are Shaped Predominantly by Conspiracy Beliefs,Mistrust in Science and Fear – A Comparison of More than 20 Psychological Variables
The global coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic sparked a great interest in psychological factors that determine or explain peoples' responses to the novel threatening situation and the preventive measures (e.g. wearing masks, social distancing). In this study, we focused on contaminated mindware (conspiracy and paranormal beliefs) and investigated its relationship with both acceptance of and adherence to COVID-19 preventive measures, along with other variables from the domains of emotion (trait anxiety, fear), traditional personality traits (Big 5, locus of control, optimism/pessimism) and motivation (self-control, dispositional regulatory focus). A total of 22 variables were measured in an online survey (N = 374) that took place during the second wave of COVID-19 (Nov. 2020 – March 2021) in Switzerland. Of all variables, the endorsement of specific COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs was most strongly associated with lower acceptance and adherence to the preventive measures, together with mistrust in science and a more right-wing political orientation. In contrast, fear of COVID-19 and prevention regulatory focus were positively associated with acceptance and adherence. Our results therefore highlight the importance of fighting (conspiratorial) misinformation and of increasing the perceived credibility of science in reducing the spread of the coronavirus. Moreover, when acceptance was used as predictor for adherence, agreeableness and dispositional prevention regulatory focus still explained unique variance in adherence, suggesting that such personality and motivational variables play an important role in adhering and regulating preventive behaviour independent from the attitude towards the preventive measures themselves.
AarnioK.LindemanM. (2005). Paranormal beliefs, education, and thinking styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(7), 1227–1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.009
2.
AaronovitchD. (2010). Voodoo histories: How conspiracy theory has shaped modern history. Vintage Books.
3.
Abalakina‐PaapM.StephanW. G.CraigT.GregoryW. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20(3), 637–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00160
4.
AhadzadehA. S.OngF. S.WuS. L. (2021). Social media skepticism and belief in conspiracy theories about COVID-19: The moderating role of the dark triad. Current Psychology. online first.
5.
AhorsuD. K.LinC.-Y.ImaniV.SaffariM.GriffithsM. D.PakpourA. H. (2020). The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Development and Initial Validation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8
6.
AllingtonD.DuffyB.WesselyS.DhavanN.RubinJ. (2021). Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Psychological Medicine, 51(10), 1763–1769. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329172000224X
7.
AL-OmiriM. K.AlzoubiI. A.Al NazehA. A.AlomiriA. K.MaswadyM. N.LynchE. (2021). COVID-19 and personality: A cross-sectional multicenter study of the relationship between personality factors and COVID-19-related impacts, concerns, and behaviors. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 608730. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.608730
8.
Amit AharonA.NehamaH.RishponS.Baron-EpelO. (2018). A path analysis model suggesting the association between health locus of control and compliance with childhood vaccinations. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 14(7), 1618–1625. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1471305
9.
AschwandenD.StrickhouserJ. E.SeskerA. A.LeeJ. H.LuchettiM.StephanY.SutinA. R.TerraccianoA. (2021). Psychological and behavioural responses to Coronavirus disease 2019: The role of personality. European Journal of Personality, 35(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2281
10.
BergM. B.LinL. (2020). Prevalence and predictors of early COVID-19 behavioral intentions in the United States. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 10(4), 843–849. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaa085
BetschT.AßmannL.GlöcknerA. (2020). Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: Story seeking without reasoned review. Heliyon, 6(6), e04259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04259
13.
BierwiaczonekK.KunstJ. R.PichO. (2020). Belief in COVID‐19 conspiracy theories reduces social distancing over time. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 12(4), 1270–1285. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12223
14.
BlackmoreS.MooreR. (1994). Seeing things: Visual recognition and belief in the paranormal. European Journal of Parapsychology, 10, 91-103.
15.
BlagovP. S. (2021). Adaptive and dark personality in the COVID-19 pandemic: Predicting health-behavior endorsement and the appeal of public-health messages. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 697–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620936439
16.
BlancoF.BarberiaI.MatuteH. (2015). Individuals who believe in the paranormal expose themselves to biased information and develop more causal illusions than nonbelievers in the laboratory. Plos One, 10(7), e0131378. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131378
17.
BoggT.MiladE. (2020). Demographic, personality, and social cognition correlates of coronavirus guideline adherence in a U.S. sample. Health Psychology, 39(12), 1026–1036. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000891
18.
BowesS. M.CostelloT. H.MaW.LilienfeldS. O. (2021). Looking under the tinfoil hat: Clarifying the personological and psychopathological correlates of conspiracy beliefs. Journal of Personality, 89(3), 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12588
19.
BrothertonR.FrenchC. C.PickeringA. D. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279
20.
BrouardS.VasilopoulosP.BecherM. (2020). Sociodemographic and psychological correlates of compliance with the COVID-19 public health measures in France. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423920000335
21.
BruderM.HaffkeP.NeaveN.NouripanahN.ImhoffR. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225
22.
BruderM.KunertL. (2021). The conspiracy hoax? Testing key hypotheses about the correlates of generic beliefs in conspiracy theories during the COVID ‐19 pandemic. International Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 12769. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12769
23.
BruggerP.GravesR. E. (1997). Testing vs. believing hypotheses: Magical ideation in the judgement of contingencies. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 2(4), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/135468097396270
24.
CaciB.MiceliS.ScrimaF.CardaciM. (2020). Neuroticism and fear of COVID-19. The interplay between boredom, fantasy engagement, and perceived control over time. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(2020), 574393. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574393
25.
CarlucciL.D’AmbrosioI.BalsamoM. (2020). Demographic and attitudinal factors of adherence to quarantine guidelines during COVID-19: The Italian model. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 559288. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559288
CarverC. S.WhiteT. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319
28.
ČavojováV.ŠrolJ.JurkovičM. (2020). Why should we try to think like scientists? Scientific reasoning and susceptibility to epistemically suspect beliefs and cognitive biases. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3595
29.
ChangE. C. (1998). Does dispositional optimism moderate the relation between perceived stress and psychological well-being?: A preliminary investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(2), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00028-2
30.
ChomaB. L.AshtonM. C.HaferC. L. (2010). Conceptualizing political orientation in Canadian political candidates: A tale of two (correlated) dimensions. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 42(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015650
31.
CichockaA.MarchlewskaM.de ZavalaA. G. (2016). Does self-love or self-hate predict conspiracy beliefs? Narcissism, self-esteem, and the Endorsement of conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615616170
32.
ClarkC.DavilaA.RegisM.KrausS. (2020). Predictors of COVID-19 voluntary compliance behaviors: An international investigation. Global Transitions, 2, 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2020.06.003
33.
ConstantinouM.KagialisA.KareklaM. (2021). COVID-19 scientific facts vs. conspiracy theories: Is science failing to pass Its message?International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126343
CurranP. J.WestS. G.FinchJ. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
36.
DarwinH.NeaveN.HolmesJ. (2011). Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(8), 1289–1293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.027
37.
DeFranzaD.LindowM.HarrisonK.MishraA.MishraH. (2020). Religion and reactance to COVID-19 mitigation guidelines. American Psychologist, 76(5), 744–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000717
38.
DenovanA.DagnallN.DrinkwaterK.ParkerA. (2018). Latent profile analysis of schizotypy and paranormal belief: Associations with probabilistic reasoning performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 35. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00035
39.
DenovanA.DagnallN.DrinkwaterK.ParkerA.NeaveN. (2020). Conspiracist beliefs, intuitive thinking, and schizotypal facets: A further evaluation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(6), 1394–1405. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3716
40.
DevereuxP. G.MillerM. K.KirshenbaumJ. M. (2021). Moral disengagement, locus of control, and belief in a just world: Individual differences relate to adherence to COVID-19 guidelines. Personality and Individual Differences, 182, 111069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111069
41.
DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M. (2011). Does it take one to know one? Endorsement of conspiracy theories is influenced by personal willingness to conspire: Conspiracy theories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02018.x
42.
DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M.CichockaA. (2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261
43.
DrinkwaterK.DagnallN.ParkerA. (2012). Reality testing, conspiracy theories, and paranormal beliefs. Journal of Parapsychology, 67(1), 57–77.
44.
DuplagaM. (2020). The determinants of conspiracy beliefs related to the COVID-19 pandemic in a nationally representative sample of internet users. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 7818. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217818
45.
EarnshawV. A.EatonL. A.KalichmanS. C.BrousseauN. M.HillE. C.FoxA. B. (2020). COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, health behaviors, and policy support. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 10(4), 850–856. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaa090
46.
EbrahimiO. V.HoffartA.JohnsonS. U. (2020). The mental health impact of non-pharmacological interventions aimed at impeding viral transmission during the COVID-19 pandemic in a general adult population and the factors associated with adherence to these mitigation strategies. [Preprint]. PsyArXivhttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kjzsp
47.
EckbladM.ChapmanL. J. (1983). Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy. J Consult Clin Psychol, 51(2), 215–225.
48.
EndersA. M.UscinskiJ. E. (2021). Are misinformation, antiscientific claims, and conspiracy theories for political extremists?Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 583–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220960805
49.
EpsteinS.PaciniR.Denes-RajV.HeierH. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive–experiential and analytical–rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390
50.
ErcegN.RužojčićM.GalićZ. (2020). Misbehaving in the Corona crisis: The role of anxiety and unfounded beliefs. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01040-4
51.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
52.
FisseniH.-J. (2004). Textbook of psychological diagnostics (3rd ed.). Hogrefe.
53.
FosterK. R.KokkoH. (2009). The evolution of superstitious and superstition-like behaviour. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1654), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.0981
54.
FreemanD.WaiteF.RosebrockL.PetitA.CausierC.EastA.JennerL.TealeA.-L.CarrL.MulhallS.BoldE.LambeS. (2022). Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England. Psychological Medicine, 52, 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720001890
55.
Frías-ArmentaM.Corral-FríasN. S.Corral-VerdugoV.LucasM. Y. (2021). Psychological predictors of precautionary behaviors in response to COVID-19: A structural model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 559289. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.559289
GallifordN.FurnhamA. (2017). Individual difference factors and beliefs in medical and political conspiracy theories. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(5), 422–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12382
58.
GlaesmerH.HoyerJ.KlotscheJ.HerzbergP. Y. (2008). Die deutsche version des life-orientation-tests (LOT-R) zum dispositionellen optimismus und pessimismus. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 16(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1026/0943-8149.16.1.26
GollwitzerA.McLouglinK.MartelC.MarshallJ.HöhsJ. M.BarghJ. A. (2021). Linking self-reported social distancing to real-world behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Psychological and Personality Science. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/19485506211018132.
61.
GoreisA.VoracekM. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological research on conspiracy beliefs: Field characteristics, measurement Instruments, and associations with personality traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 205. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00205
62.
GratzK. L.RichmondJ. R.WoodsS. E.Dixon-GordonK. L.ScamaldoK. M.RoseJ. P.TullM. T. (2021). Adherence to social distancing guidelines throughout the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of pseudoscientific beliefs, trust, political party affiliation, and risk perceptions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 55(5), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaab024
63.
Grzesiak-FeldmanM. (2013). The effect of high-anxiety situations on conspiracy thinking. Current Psychology, 32(1), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-013-9165-6
64.
GuarneraS.WilliamsR. L. (1987). Optimism and locus of control for health and affiliation among elderly adults. Journal of Gerontology, 42(6), 594–595. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/42.6.594
65.
HamsherJ. H.GellerJ. D.RotterJ. B. (1968). Interpersonal trust, internal-external control, and the Warren Commission report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(3), 210–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025900.
66.
HartmanR. O.DieckmannN. F.SprengerA. M.StastnyB. J.DeMarreeK. G. (2017). Modeling attitudes toward science: Development and validation of the credibility of science scale. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(6), 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.1372284
67.
HawsK. L.DholakiaU. M.BeardenW. O. (2010). An assessment of chronic regulatory focus measures. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(5), 967–982. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.5.967
68.
HigginsE. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in experimental social psychology, 30. 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60381-0Elsevier
69.
HigginsE. T.FriedmanR. S.HarlowR. E.IdsonL. C.AydukO. N.TaylorA. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.27
HuL.BentlerP. M.KanoY. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.351
72.
HughesS.MachanL. (2021). It’s a conspiracy: Covid-19 conspiracies link to psychopathy, Machiavellianism and collective narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 171(1), 110559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110559
73.
ImhoffR.BruderM. (2014). Speaking (un–)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1930
74.
ImhoffR.LambertyP. (2020). A bioweapon or a hoax? The link between distinct conspiracy beliefs about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and pandemic behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(8), 1110–1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620934692
75.
IrwinH. J. (2009). The psychology of paranormal belief: A researcher’s handbook. University of Hertfordshire Press.
76.
JiwaniZ.CadwellO. G.ParnesM.BrownA. D. (2021). Uncertainty in the time of corona: Precautionary adherence, fear, and anxiety in New York City during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 209(4), 251–255. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000001308
77.
JolleyD.DouglasK. M.LeiteA. C.SchraderT. (2019). Belief in conspiracy theories and intentions to engage in everyday crime. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(3), 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12311
78.
JovančevićA.MilićevićN. (2020). Optimism-pessimism, conspiracy theories and general trust as factors contributing to COVID-19 related behavior – a cross-cultural study. Personality and Individual Differences, 167(1), 110216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110216
79.
KachanoffF. J.BigmanY. E.KapsaskisK.GrayK. (2021). Measuring realistic and symbolic threats of COVID-19 and their unique impacts on well-being and adherence to public health behaviors. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620931634
80.
KellerJ.BohnerG.ErbH.-P. (2000). Intuitive und heuristische Urteilsbildung—verschiedene Prozesse? Präsentation einer deutschen Fassung des “Rational–Experiential Inventory” sowie neuer Selbstberichtskalen zur Heuristiknutzung. [Intuitive and heuristic judgment—different processes? Presentation of a German version of the Rational–Experiential Inventory and of new self-report scales of heuristic use.]. Zeitschrift Für Sozialpsychologie, 31(2), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1024/0044-3514.31.2.87
81.
KellyJ. A.LawrenceSt.J. S.BrasfieldT. L.LemkeA.AmideiT.RoffmanR. E.HoodH. V.SmithJ. E.KilgoreH.McNeillC. (1990). Psychological factors that predict AIDS high-risk versus AIDS precautionary behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58(1), 117–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.58.1.117
82.
KhooS.-A.BishopG. D. (1997). Stress and optimism: Relationships to coping and well-bein. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 40(1), 29–40.
83.
KovalevaA. (2012). The IE-4: Construction and validation of a short scale for the assessment of locus of control. GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften.
84.
KrupićD.ŽuroB.KrupićD. (2021). Big Five traits, approach-avoidance motivation, concerns and adherence with COVID-19 prevention guidelines during the peak of pandemic in Croatia. Personality and Individual Differences, 179, 110913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110913
85.
LauxL.HockM.Bergner-KötherR.HodappV.RennerK.-H. (2013). Das State-Trait-Angst-Depressions-Inventar (STADI) [The State-Trait-Anxiety-Depression-Inventar. Hogrefe.
86.
LeonardC. A.WilliamsR. J. (2019). Fallacious beliefs: Gambling specific and belief in the paranormal. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 51(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000113
87.
LeoneL.GiacomantonioM.WilliamsR.MichettiD. (2018). Avoidant attachment style and conspiracy ideation. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.043
88.
LewandowskyS.GignacG. E.OberauerK. (2013). The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of Science. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e75637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075637
89.
LindemanM.AarnioK. (2007). Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.06.009
90.
LippoldJ. V.LaskeJ. I.HogeterpS. A.DukeÉ.GrünhageT.ReuterM. (2020). The role of personality, political attitudes and socio-demographic characteristics in explaining individual differences in fear of Coronavirus: A comparison over time and across countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 552305. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552305
91.
LobatoE. J. C.MendozaJ.SimsV.ChinM. (2014). Examining the relationship between conspiracy theories, paranormal beliefs, and pseudoscience acceptance among a university population. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(5), 617–625. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3042
92.
LobatoE. J. C.PowellM.PadillaL. M. K.HolbrookC. (2020). Factors predicting willingness to share COVID-19 misinformation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(2), 566108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566108
93.
LobatoE. J. C.ZimmermanC. (2019). Examining how people reason about controversial scientific topics. Thinking & Reasoning, 25(2), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1521870
94.
LockwoodP.JordanC. H.KundaZ. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 854–864. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.854
95.
MarchE.SpringerJ. (2019). Belief in conspiracy theories: The predictive role of schizotypy, machiavellianism, and primary psychopathy. PLOS ONE, 14(12), e0225964. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225964
96.
MatuteH.YarrituI.VadilloM. A. (2011). Illusions of causality at the heart of pseudoscience: Illusions of causality in pseudoscience. British Journal of Psychology, 102(3), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712610X532210
97.
McCauleyC.JacquesS. (1979). The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: A Bayesian analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(5), 637–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.5.637
98.
MontagC.SindermannC.RozgonjukD.YangS.ElhaiJ. D.YangH. (2021). Investigating links between fear of COVID-19, neuroticism, social networks use disorder, and smartphone use disorder tendencies. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(1), 682837. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682837
99.
MorganM.CollinsW. B.SparksG. G.WelchJ. R. (2018). Identifying relevant anti-science perceptions to Improve science-based communication: The Negative Perceptions of Science Scale. Social Sciences, 7(4), 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7040064
100.
MuschJ.EhrenbergK. (2002). Probability misjudgment, cognitive ability, and belief in the paranormal. British Journal of Psychology, 93(2), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712602162517
101.
NowakB.BrzóskaP.PiotrowskiJ.SedikidesC.Żemojtel-PiotrowskaM.JonasonP. K. (2020). Adaptive and maladaptive behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of dark triad traits, collective narcissism, and health beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 167(1), 110232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110232
102.
OlagokeA. A.OlagokeO. O.HughesA. M. (2021). Intention to vaccinate against the novel 2019 coronavirus disease: The role of health locus of control and religiosity. Journal of Religion and Health, 60(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-020-01090-9
103.
OroszG.KrekóP.PaskujB.Tóth-KirályI.BőtheB.Roland-LévyC. (2016). Changing conspiracy beliefs through rationality and ridiculing. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01525
104.
Pavela BanaiI.BanaiB.MikloušićI. (2020). Beliefs in COVID-19 conspiracy theories predict lower level of compliance with the preventive measures both directly and indirectly by lowering trust in government medical officials. [Preprint]. PsyArXivhttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yevq7
105.
PennycookG.CheyneJ. A.SeliP.KoehlerD. J.FugelsangJ. A. (2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123(3), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003
106.
PlohlN.MusilB. (2021). Modeling compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines: The critical role of trust in science. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 26(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1772988
107.
PummererL.BöhmR.LilleholtL.WinterK.ZettlerI.SassenbergK. (2021). Conspiracy theories and their societal effects during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 194855062110002. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211000217
108.
RammstedtB.KemperC. J.KleinM. C.BeierleinC.KovalevaA. (2013). A short scale for assessing the big five dimensions of personality: 10 Item Big Five Inventory (BFI-10). Methoden, Daten, Analysen (mda), 7(2), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2013.013
109.
Reinders FolmerC.KuiperM. E.OlthuisE.KooistraE. B.de BruijnA. L.BrownleeM.FineA.van RooijB. (2020). Compliance in the 1.5 meter society: Longitudinal analysis of citizens’ adherence to COVID-19 mitigation measures in a representative sample in the Netherlands in Early April, Early May, and Late May. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3624959
110.
RizeqJ.FloraD. B.ToplakM. E. (2021). An examination of the underlying dimensional structure of three domains of contaminated mindware: Paranormal beliefs, conspiracy beliefs, and anti-science attitudes. Thinking & Reasoning, 27(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2020.1759688
111.
RomerD.JamiesonK. H. (2020). Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S. Social Science & Medicine, 263, 113356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356
112.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An r package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
113.
RothgerberH.WilsonT.WhaleyD.RosenfeldD. L.HumphreyM.MooreA. L.BihlA. (2020). Politicizing the COVID-19 pandemic: Ideological differences in adherence to social distancing. [Preprint]. PsyArXivhttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k23cv
114.
RotterJ. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
115.
SallamM.DababsehD.YaseenA.Al-HaidarA.AbabnehN. A.BakriF. G.MahafzahA. (2020). Conspiracy beliefs are associated with lower knowledge and higher anxiety levels regarding COVID-19 among students at the University of Jordan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(14), 4915. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17144915
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In von EyeA.CloggC. C. (Eds) Latent variable analysis: Applications to developmental research, (pp. 399–419). Sage.
118.
ScheierM. F.CarverC. S.BridgesM. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1063–1078. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063
119.
ScheierM. F.WeintraubJ. K.CarverC. S. (1986). Coping with stress: Divergent strategies of optimists and pessimists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1257–1264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1257
120.
ScholerA. A.CornwellJ. F. M.HigginsE. T. (2019). Regulatory focus theory and research: Catching up and looking forward after 20 years. In RyanR. M. (Ed), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (2nd ed., pp. 1–35). Oxford University Press.
121.
SchulterG.PapousekI. (2008). Believing in paranormal phenomena: Relations to asymmetry of body and brain. Cortex, 44(10), 1326–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.022
122.
SiebenhaarK. U.KötherA. K.AlpersG. W. (2020). Dealing with the COVID-19 infodemic: Distress by information, information avoidance, and compliance with preventive measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(1), 567905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567905
123.
SpielbergerC. D. (1972). Anxiety as an emotional state. In: Anxiety. Current trends in theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 24–49). Academic Press.
124.
ŠrolJ.Ballová MikuškováE.ČavojováV. (2021). When we are worried, what are we thinking? Anxiety, lack of control, and conspiracy beliefs amidst the COVID‐19 pandemic. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(3), 720–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3798
125.
StadlerM.NiepelC.BotesE.DörendahlJ.KriegerF.GreiffS. (2020). Individual psychological responses to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: Different clusters and their relation to risk-reducing behavior. [Preprint]. PsyArXivhttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k8unc
126.
StåhlT.van ProoijenJ.-W. (2018). Epistemic rationality: Skepticism toward unfounded beliefs requires sufficient cognitive ability and motivation to be rational. Personality and Individual Differences, 122(1), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.026
127.
SteptoeA.WardleJ. (2001). Locus of control and health behaviour revisited: A multivariate analysis of young adults from 18 countries. British Journal of Psychology, 92(4), 659–672. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712601162400
128.
SuttonR. M.DouglasK. M. (2014). Examining the monological nature of conspiracy theories. In van ProojenJ.-W.van LangeP. A. (Eds) Power, politics, and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders, (pp. 254–272). Cambridge University Press.
129.
SwamiV.Chamorro-PremuzicT.FurnhamA. (2010). Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1583
130.
SwamiV.ColesR.StiegerS.PietschnigJ.FurnhamA.RehimS.VoracekM. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories: Conspiracist ideation. British Journal of Psychology, 102(3), 443–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x
131.
SwamiV.FurnhamA.SmythN.WeisL.LayA.ClowA. (2016). Putting the stress on conspiracy theories: Examining associations between psychological stress, anxiety, and belief in conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 99(1), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.084
132.
SwamiV.PietschnigJ.TranU. S.NaderI. W.StiegerS.VoracekM. (2013). Lunar lies: The impact of informational framing and individual differences in shaping conspiracist beliefs about the moon landings: Conspiracy theories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2873
133.
SweenyK.DooleyM. D. (2017). The surprising upsides of worry. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(4), e12311. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12311
134.
TangneyJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.BooneA. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x
135.
TeovanovićP.LukićP.ZupanZ.LazićA.NinkovićM.ŽeželjI. (2021). Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3770
136.
ThalbourneM. A. (2010). The Australian sheep-goat scale: Development and empirical findings. Aust. J. Parapsychol, 10(1), 5–39.
137.
ThalbourneM. A.DelinP. S. (1993). A new instrument for measuring the sheep-goat variable: Its psychometric properties and factor structure. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 59(832), 172–186.
138.
ThorsonJ. A.PowellF. C. (1994). A revised death anxiety scale. In NeimeyerR. A. (Ed), Death anxiety handbook: Research, instrumentation, and application (pp. 303–381). Taylor & Francis.
139.
TobayckJ. (2004). A revised paranormal belief scale. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 23(1), 94–98.
140.
TribertiS.DurosiniI.PravettoniG. (2021). Social distancing is the right thing to do: Dark Triad behavioral correlates in the COVID-19 quarantine. Personality and Individual Differences, 170, 110453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110453
141.
UscinskiJ. E.EndersA. M.SeeligM. I.KlofstadC. A.FunchionJ. R.EverettC.WuchtyS.PremaratneK.MurthiM. N. (2021). American politics in two dimensions: Partisan and ideological identities versus anti‐establishment orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 65(4), 877–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12616
142.
VallyZ. (2020). Public perceptions, anxiety and the perceived efficacy of health-protective behaviours to mitigate the spread of the SARS-Cov-2/ COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health, 187, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.08.002
143.
van der LindenS. (2015). The conspiracy-effect: Exposure to conspiracy theories (about global warming) decreases pro-social behavior and science acceptance. Personality and Individual Differences, 87, 171–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.045
144.
van ProoijenJ.-W.DouglasK. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701615
145.
van ProoijenJ.-W.DouglasK. M.De InocencioC. (2018a). Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural: Illusory pattern perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(3), 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2331
146.
van ProoijenJ.-W.JostmannN. B. (2013). Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality: Belief in conspiracy theories. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(1), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1922
147.
van ProoijenJ.-W.KrouwelA. P. M.PolletT. V. (2015). Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 570–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614567356
148.
van ProoijenJ.-W.RutjensB.BrandtM. (2018b). Populism as political mentality underlying conspiracy theories. In: Belief systems and the perception of reality. Routledge.
149.
VaughnL. A.GarveyC. A.ChalachanR. D. (2020). Need support and regulatory focus in responding to COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 589446. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589446
150.
VolkA. A.BrazilK. J.Franklin-LutherP.DaneA. V.VaillancourtT. (2021). The influence of demographics and personality on COVID-19 coping in young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110398
151.
WeinsteinN. D. (1982). Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 5, 441–460.
152.
WeissG. L.LarsenD. L. (1990). Health value, health locus of control, and the prediction of health protective behaviors. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 18(1), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1990.18.1.121
153.
WolffW.MartarelliC. S.SchülerJ.BielekeM. (2020). High boredom proneness and low trait self-control impair adherence to social distancing guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 5420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155420
154.
WoodM. J.DouglasK. M.SuttonR. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434786
155.
WoodM. J.GrayD. (2019). Right-wing authoritarianism as a predictor of pro-establishment versus anti-establishment conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences, 138(1), 163–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.036
WrightL.SteptoeA.FancourtD. (2021). Predictors of self-reported adherence to COVID-19 guidelines. A longitudinal observational study of 51,600 UK adults. The Lancet Regional Health - Europe, 4, 100061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100061
159.
XieX.-F.StoneE.ZhengR.ZhangR.-G. (2011). The ‘typhoon eye effect’: Determinants of distress during the SARS epidemic. Journal of Risk Research, 14(9), 1091–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2011.571790
160.
XuP.ChengJ. (2021). Individual differences in social distancing and mask-wearing in the pandemic of COVID-19: The role of need for cognition, self-control and risk attitude. Personality and Individual Differences, 175, 110706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110706
161.
ZajenkowskiM.JonasonP. K.LeniarskaM.KozakiewiczZ. (2020). Who complies with the restrictions to reduce the spread of COVID-19?: Personality and perceptions of the COVID-19 situation. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, 110199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110199
162.
ZitekE. M.SchlundR. J. (2021). Psychological entitlement predicts noncompliance with the health guidelines of the COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 110491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110491
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
